The Rise Of The Profersonal In Social Media

The following is a guest post from Future Buzz community member Andrew Hanelly. If you’d like to contribute thinking here, please read the guidelines.
In the past year, social media was the vehicle that drove several high-profile careers off a cliff.
Pro athlete Larry Johnson tweeted a homophobic slur that resulted in a fan petition calling for his removal from the Kansas City Chiefs. He was later suspended.
Gilbert Gottfried lost his gig as the voice of the Aflac duck for making a joke about the aftermath of a devastating tsunami in Japan.
Journalist Octavia Nasr was fired for a controversial Tweet that violated CNN’s social media policy.
But high-profile celebrities weren’t the only “victims” in our era of real-time transparency.
Agencies lost clients.
Businesses turned off customers.
And organizations were embarrassed.
The common thread in all of these social media meltdowns is that the “person” took the wheel and the “professional” took the back seat.
In other words, caught in the heat of the moment, (or in a fit of passion) these people acted very … well, human (in many cases, however, still inappropriately so).
Can we blame them? The beauty of social media is that people are allowed to finally be themselves. Transparency, authenticity and all that, right?
Gone is the carefully planned company line and here to stay is the spontaneous and often unchecked ad-libbed line.
But if this “be yourself” mantra is the driving force behind social media’s mass adoption, then why do we come down with such a heavy hand on those that embrace it?
Because deep down we still have expectations for people who are representing a brand. And as much as we want to say social media is the pinnacle of freedom of expression, if you are tied to an organization, your social media outbursts could bring them down with you. It is, in one word: irresponsible.
Which is why we need to look at this sobering piece of reality: when you use social media, you forfeit the right to truly be yourself with no holds barred. Holds are definitely barred.
Whether you’re managing official accounts or feeding your own, directly or indirectly, you are linked to the company that helps you pay your bills (if you don’t like it, find a new line of work).
If you represent an organization, (and anyone who receives a paycheck from an organization does) you’re going to need to start acting like a profersonal (if you haven’t done the math, that’s professional blended with personal).
The lines are irreversibly blurred between our personal and professional lives. There is no more “privacy” or protected content online. Only content waiting to be found like ticking time bombs we never needed to create.
Here are the new rules we must live by:
Act as if anyone will be able to read what you write, track you down, connect you to your organization, and have chaos ensue. When we look at the example of Detroit Motor city Tweet and also the Red Cross Tweet we see that this excuse was used: “I thought I was sending it from my personal account.” If the Twitter users behind those accounts employed this logic, the mistake never would have happened.
Don’t swear, get political, get preachy or do anything else you wouldn’t do at an all-hands meeting. It may seem disconnected from your work life while you’re ranting from your dark basement, but when the lights come on, everyone can see the proverbial logo you wear.
Have fun, but make sure it’s good, clean fun. The kind you might have with Shrek, not Charlie Sheen. The kind the Bronx Zoo Cobra had back in the day.
Continue to treat social media like a cocktail party. But make sure it doesn’t turn into an 8 day bender where you end up in a Las Vegas suite with a tiger.
I’ll probably be called conservative, scared, and several unprintable names for putting together this shiny, corporate-friendly post. But it’s the truth, and embracing it will be liberating and finally rid us of the false anxiety of thinking that some of our social media content is personal and some of it is professional.
If you have a job, all of your social media activity is both personal and professional. It’s profersonal. It’s the era we live in.
Andrew creates and executes digital strategies for clients at TMG Custom Media. You can follow him on Twitter and check out his posts on Engage the Blog.
image credit: Shutterstock









Brandon Mendelson replied | Jan 10, 2012 (5 comments)
This sounds like a surefire plan for mediocrity to me.
Adam Singer replied | Jan 10, 2012 (563 comments)
Thanks for commenting Brandon. I don’t think Andrew was saying be mediocre. I think he was saying to use common sense, and to maintain professionalism if you’re going to have conversations in public. You should also check out this thread which is illustrative about the damage social can do even if not direct: http://thefuturebuzz.com/2011/06/27/hire-smart-people/. I’ll let Andrew respond further, however – as this is his post :)
andrew replied | Jan 10, 2012 (36 comments)
It definitely makes things more of a challenge, but I don’t think it guarantees mediocrity. Believe me, I think there are a ton of exceptions to this, and some brands will be able to buck this advice and have wild success. But a big frustration at a lot of organization is the fact that their marketing plan can’t include things like what Kenny Powers did for K-Swiss. It’s just not in their brand DNA. It runs the risk of alienating their core audience to please the broader pop culture audience.
I’m not saying that these rules are absolute, but I think they are healthy suggestions to consider.
Do you think it’s impossible to be successful with these guidelines in mind? I’m curious.
Anyway, thanks for taking the time to comment.
Brandon Mendelson replied | Jan 10, 2012 (5 comments)
The problem with this kind of advice, in general, is that it’s very generic. Everyone (and every company) is different. So telling one brand or person to act more professional may make sense for one group, but won’t make any sense for another.
That’s the issue with “rules” and “guidelines” like this.
Do I think it’s impossible to be successful with these guidelines? It all depends on who we’re talking about and what they want to do.
You and I can’t tell them what to do or give them advice because we’re not them.
andrew replied | Jan 10, 2012 (36 comments)
I think my angle was more to the individual person who works for a hypothetical company (though it clearly didn’t translate as I thought it would). My point is that if you’re working for a company anything you do online is directly or indirectly tied to that company. So be careful thinking you’re OK posting something because it’s on your personal account – in the era we live in, it can still reflect poorly on your brand.
If the strategy for an organization is to push the envelope in terms of the nature of its content, then by all means social media interaction can contain a lot of stuff that might be R-rated. But again, that’s not being yourself, that’s being on brand,.
Agreed that all advice needs to be looked at through the filter of any organization to see if it makes sense to apply. But if we stopped writing because everything we write doesn’t apply to everyone, we’d be writing nothing. (Or maybe that’s your point!)
Brandon Mendelson replied | Jan 10, 2012 (5 comments)
That is, mostly, my point. Giving people “social media” advice is often redundant. For proof, all you have to do is look at some of the more prominent marketers were saying back in 2007 and now in 2012: It’s the same old thing.
Also: “it can still reflect poorly on your brand.” Yes, but it could actually work in reverse too.
Samantha replied | Jan 10, 2012 (15 comments)
I think you make some great points here Andrew. I don’t believe this article tells anyone to be generic. Avoiding homophobic and racial slurs does not make you boring, it makes you smart. Tell me any brand, even those pushing the envelope, where calling a customer ‘chink eyes lady’ is going to bring your business to heightened success.
If telling marketer’s this advice was redundant, it wouldn’t still be happening.
Adam Singer replied | Jan 10, 2012 (563 comments)
Agreed Samantha!
content writing service replied | Jan 11, 2012 (1 comment)
Profersonal!! nice term I must say.. and I agree with Samantha here abt the “chink eyes lady” point!
Tony Faustino replied | Jan 11, 2012 (25 comments)
Andrew, the advice you provide is not generic at all. I’d argue it’s mandatory reading for any person or organization who wants to develop a credible online reputation for the long haul. Before pressing “publish” or “submit” for a blog post, a tweet, or a comment, we should always ask a simple question: “Would this offend my mom?” That simple filter would prevent the types of situations you clearly described.
The Internet has a long memory (as in forever). And, having the privilege to openly and freely contribute to its content doesn’t grant us the self-entitlement to use poor judgment, bad taste, or mean-spiritedness to denigrate others.
Our online and off-line behaviors have important implications. We owe it to ourselves and other people (and that includes our employers) to use good judgment. Otherwise, our bad behavior defeats one of the most important purposes for why The Internet was created in the first place: Fostering global communication and collaboration.
andrew replied | Jan 12, 2012 (36 comments)
I appreciate you saying that, Tony. And I absolutely (and perhaps unsurprisingly) agree with your comment.
Social media aside, if we asked how “mom” would feel prior to doing *anything*, I think we’d probably be better off!
Spatch Merlin – More Web Site Traffic Guide replied | Jan 11, 2012 (6 comments)
I think this post is something that marketers who want to reap good results should read and value. Social media is indeed doing a great job in helping marketers target customers and interact with them to build relationships. Plus, it is where the people are so it is natural for serious marketers to go there too.
David King replied | Jan 16, 2012 (1 comment)
Since Wikipedia has no authorship, presumed anonymity and is not an official publication of the company, there’s a strong temptation to do things you wouldn’t otherwise do. The mistakes companies have made on Wikipedia is another example of how transparency on the internet have embarrassed companies moving too fast.
Would you go to an all-hands meeting and tell everyone “actually, the fraud scandal being reported by USA Today never happened. We’re censoring this bit of information everywhere we can.” But you’d be surprised how often something bordering on that happens.
Nick Stamoulis replied | Jan 20, 2012 (21 comments)
This is absolutely true. Even if you are using a personal account that is “private” you need to watch what you say. If you have lots of friends or followers, it’s definitely not “private”. The only way to keep anything private is to not share it at all and err on the side of caution when posting in social media.
andrew replied | Jan 23, 2012 (36 comments)
“The only way to keep anything private is to not share it all.”
Upvote.
Derek Gillette replied | Feb 7, 2012 (1 comment)
I had no idea the term “profersonal” existed, but I love it. I actually just wrote on this topic the other day but in perhaps the opposite voice as this article.
I am one of those fans of transparency, sure, but also I call it well-roundedness. I am strongly against racial slurs, bad mouthing, negativity, etc, but covering a wide range of topics and emotions I think is important.
Link: http://journeyofadad.blogspot.com/2012/02/how-to-create-mass-virus.html
Deola replied | Feb 23, 2012 (1 comment)
Thanks Andrew,
this explains the best practices of a community manager. I like the coctail party analogy.
Profersonal? Nice one!