7 Signs You Shouldn’t Hire *That* SEO Agency
Having worked at a variety of different digital marketing consultancies (including an SEO firm) I’ve been privy to the pitches, proposals and processes of many competing agencies.
Usually they’re forwarded by client for a second opinion, I’m brought into meetings with other agencies or even friends ask me for an opinion about a consultancy they are thinking of hiring.
I’ve also been pitched myself by SEO firms, who don’t realize that, in fact, our team at LEWIS executes SEO services for clients (at the intersection of search, social and PR). When reviewing their plans I’m frequently amused by just how ignorant many are to a truly effective online marketing program.
While a select few SEO shops such as TopRank Marketing, (my previous employer) Outspoken Media, Portent Interactive and AimClear offer top-notch SEO services, an overwhelming majority of agencies in this space should be avoided at all costs.
So what are the worst things I’ve seen from an insider perspective? Here are 7 signs you definitely shouldn’t hire that SEO agency:
1. They guarantee first page / place rankings
This is just silly, no SEO firm can or should guarantee this. First of all, rankings are a KPI of traffic, by themselves they don’t really mean anything. But secondly, firms saying this are saying it because they have no real reputation, results or reputable clients to stand on. No legitimate SEO firms promise this. None. Zero exceptions. If you ever see this, run.
2. They only provide ranking reports but not actual search traffic / conversion reports
Again with rankings, here I am referring to SEO shops that don’t actually report any search traffic or conversion data. They likely don’t even have a process to get access to any client’s web analytics, because that would make them actually be accountable to results-oriented metrics. Instead they simply provide ranking reports. Which are completely meaningless on their own. As said, rankings are a KPI, not an outcome – and becoming less and less important everyday in a search landscape prioritizing personalization and social.
Judging an SEO firm on search rankings is like judging a social media firm on their ability to increase your Klout score. It might make everyone feel warm and fuzzy. It won’t actually produce outcomes.
3. Their plans purely involve building links and bookmarking a limited set of web pages
This is a dinosaur method of SEO. And by dinosaur, we mean one companies were implementing years ago when anchor text links reigned supreme, before searchers started getting smarter, (remember, 1-2 word queries are now decreasing, while 3-5+ word queries are increasing) before personalization (when everyone saw the same page 1) and before search engines started favoring robust, content rich sites based on a diverse tapestry of signals difficult to game (brand, social, etc.).
I’ve seen SEO firms who tell brands “oh, your 20 page site is fine, that’s all you need – we’ll just build a bunch of (worthless) links.” And, with this, my blood pressure immediately rises. This is not SEO. This is a waste of time and resources. Funny enough many brands love this and hire chop shop SEOs because they don’t actually have to change anything on their website or do any real work. Sad.
4. No team members represented on their website / no one in the industry has heard of them
This is an easy one to spot for any service provider. If the people behind a service don’t publicly represent themselves, you should never hire such an agency. Even if they tell you who they are in private, it is a huge red flag they don’t publicly share the leaders of the organization and at least a few team members. Further, beyond this, the SEO industry is relatively tight knit. Connect with a few well known people in the industry, they will be happy to tell you if they’ve heard of the agency. If you consult a few people and no one knows them that’s a red flag.
5. They’re not able to provide references to other clients
Any agency worth their salt is able to provide references of clients at reputable companies. If they are unable or unwilling to provide this it is a negative signal of their credibility. Again, this goes beyond SEO to any type of service provider: the legitimate ones always have references who are able to clearly articulate their experience / results.
6. The SEO / digital marketing trades have never talked about them
Conduct a quick Google search of the SEO agency’s brand name. If you find nothing on a legitimate digital marketing trade, run. Fast. The only SEOs worth hiring are the ones pushing the envelope and leading the industry. They truly care about what they are doing and are off experimenting, building connections and creating content on their own worth reacting to. You have to in a space that is so dynamic. And our trade publications, especially the top sites like Search Engine Land, AdAge, etc. do their homework to report on quality agencies.
7. They don’t blog / have an active presence on social outposts
I am sure there are good SEO agencies out there who don’t blog. But not great. Argue with me if you want, but the people who really care about SEO blog. This shows they are not only passionate about the space, but that they are savvy enough to use the web as an organic marketing tool for themselves. And those that go through the process, live it every day and constantly refine their own marketing have a distinct advantage vs. those who do not. This is the ultimate sandbox to learn in and any agency savvy in the web is embracing it.
Of course, this is just a short list. There are other items to consider such as technical chops, analysis capabilities, creative content ideas, etc. but I thought I’d throw it over to the readers: what are some other signs you’d add to the mix?
image via 50 viral images part 8







Denise replied | Nov 4, 2011 (1 comment)
You couldn’t say this loudly enough, “As said, rankings are a KPI, not an outcome – and becoming less and less important everyday in a search landscape prioritizing personalization and social.” It’s results I want (quality traffic and conversions), not a lot of noise. Ask for conversion metrics and get client referrals (client referrals being a good practice regardless of the type of business you’re doing with a company that’s new to you).
Denise
http://www.writemoneyinc.com
Alan Bleiweiss replied | Nov 4, 2011 (3 comments)
I have to disagree with half of number 4, and all of number 6 and number 7. Before I became “known”, I worked for years on SEO for client sites. In fact, it was the outstanding services I provided related to SEO for those clients that eventually became points referenced once I began blogging, conferencing, and tweeting within the “community”. However for the years I was “off the radar” within the community, I was still a frakkin stellar SEO. Limelight does NOT equate quality. Neither does popularity within that community. They’re potentially even VERY misleading, because I’ve had to perform audits on sites previously “optimized” by some very well known people in this industry who turned out to be half-wits.
Adam Singer replied | Nov 4, 2011 (599 comments)
Hey Alan – I agree, having the experience / results you have is a reason on it’s own to hire you. But you have credibility / endorsement from the industry as well due to this. And that’s the point, SEO isn’t new, and you want an experienced team who the rest of the industry looks to. Further, you’re a consultant not an agency (right?). I think an agency *does* need those proof points moreso than someone who is independent.
Alan Bleiweiss replied | Nov 4, 2011 (3 comments)
I have the credibility/endorsement only because I intentionally chose to participate in the community. Before I got involved, I had the credibility of existing success and client advocates. That’s what I’m referring to – not having community buy-in to me, isn’t an issue. So perhaps we’ll need to just have our own views on it. :-)
Tommy Spero replied | Nov 4, 2011 (1 comment)
Great read. One other thing that I would consider is how that agency’s website ranks for the terms they should be coming up for. I attended a seminar yesterday where a local SEO expert spoke. Upon returning to my office, I quickly googled his agency for terms they should be ranked for. They were no where to be found, even 4-5 pages deep. Tsk. Tsk.
Samantha replied | Nov 4, 2011 (15 comments)
This made me laugh as my boss, the Marketing Director, constantly complains about these exact points! Another one to watch our for is using buzz words and out dated tactics that the average person falls for, even though they are worthless-like keyword density and meta tags.
Catherine Lockey replied | Nov 6, 2011 (63 comments)
Thanks for taking the time to write this Adam. It’s very cool Alan Bleiweiss is commenting here – a testament to your impressive community. Content Marketing and SEO have merged (thanks to all Google’s algorithm changes in the last year) so it makes sense to vet digital marketing agencies via their blog results (among other things). I’ve noticed in the industry conversion can mean downloaded a whitepaper, filled out an interactive form, or called a business. Yet, to some businesses a conversion means hired or purchased. Therefore, it’s probably best to ask every agency how they define conversion.
Mathias Zillman replied | Nov 8, 2011 (1 comment)
It is a very good read and even so that I want to agree with all your points, I can’t. I recently moved from the UK to Spain and with all the experience I got and knowledge I build, I still see many contracts sold based on Rankings and Top 3/5/10 positions for x amount of sites. The SEO community here in Spain does its best to build up knowledge, especially with Website owners and Marketing departments, however in the end of the day these exact same people want rankings and only buy into that. Only after many discussions and providing evidence that rankings doesn’t necessarily equals traffic is it possible to change their minds, but most of the time after the contract has been sold and objectives set. I know you are right and that there are many proves for this, however it depends heavily on the market you work in. In the US / UK / (DE) you are 100% right, in markets like ES you have to get your foot in the door first before talking about that rankings doesn’t mean as much as the people believe.
Maciej Fita replied | Nov 8, 2011 (2 comments)
Number 6 can be a tough one. The industry is very clicky at times and if you are not part of the “cool club” it can be difficult to get others to acknowledge you as a viable entity that does good work.
Sami replied | Nov 8, 2011 (9 comments)
Great article for a PR grad student. My bosses are looking into SEO for our company and these tips are awesome. Thank you for writing this. It’s something super relevant that people don’t talk about enough! SEO is a super helpful tool, but just like everything else on the internet, it can really backfire with improper usage.
Musson Media replied | Nov 12, 2011 (1 comment)
I totally agree with the first 5 points but disagree with 6 and 7. An SEO agency or consultancy especially within the first couple years, that is truly doing their job to grow a profitable honest business and getting true results for clients that equate to a positive growth and ROI greater than what they are paying the agency is incredibly important in order to build a credible reputation and keep up with the ever changing SEO and search environment. Once you’ve done this for a couple of businesses and you start to get referrals then the workload can increase exponentially creating less time for blogging and industry outreach. At the end of the day results are what matter and I know of not one client of mine that has ever questioned my participation within the “community” or why my agency does not blog more than we do. How can we spend our time “doing” and “performing” when so much time is spent blogging and tweeting especially when many agencies are bootstrapped for the first couple years and make the wise decision to hire an employee to perform the actual work rather than write and gloat about it. Correctly performing SEO, content development, link building, social media, reputation management, etc takes an incredible amount of work, strategy, scheduling, analysis, and oversight not to mention testing and learning at a non stop pace to stay on top of changes and strategies. I myself am skeptical of many so called “experts” as anybody can repurpose content to appear to be credible.
Also, bookmarking may be an “archaic’ form of link building but in my experience and testing it’s more effective now as a viable white hat link building source post panda than it ever was circa 2006-2008. Just a rare post panda nugget from a very busy “non-industry expert”:-)
If a business owner asked you to blog more frequently or requested to meet you at the next big SEO conference and you turned him or her down with the following answer, “Sorry client, I’d love to attend or write more, but effectively and consistently bringing you positive ROI requires that we stay on top of all accounts and industry changes, however, we can discuss anything you hear at the conference at our next progress/update meeting along with changes and new opportunities we have found in the trenches while testing this month that we’ve found have increased another clients traffic and conversions by 16%”. I don’t think too many business owners would “fault” this answer or consider you less “qualified”, as a matter of fact, I’m quite sure it would eventually bring you more business, respect, and trust. A “great” SEO doesn’t even need to rely on SEO itself once established that you bring results and positive ROI as referrals alone will fill your pipeline quickly especially with the demand nowadays. One of the posters is snickering about another agencies rankings, chances are that agency doesn’t even care, an experienced SEO firm often only procures top rankings for testing purposes and ego. It’s not all glitz and glamour folks, it’s hard work and a real business and should be treated as such, with passion. There will always be business owners that fall for a “cheaper” provider or a higher priced “perceived expert” only to be disappointed. But do they learn from their mistakes?
Josh replied | Dec 5, 2011 (1 comment)
Great article. Digital marketing is a booming field. One key thing I have learned with SEO is social media. It is so important that social media has an impact on your webpage, you would be surprised how much it can help you.
Xavier replied | Dec 11, 2011 (1 comment)
Really enjoyed this article. I learned a lot about SEO in my digital marketing class, these are definitely some helpful tips, thanks.
Sharper Cards replied | Jan 10, 2012 (1 comment)
Thanks for the great post. We are currently looking to hire a new SEO company to help us with our search engine optimization efforts. A lot of companies do guarantee the first place placement for some of our keywords, so thanks to your tips we will be able to narrow it down to a few reputable companies to hire. Cheers.
arunvinud replied | Feb 17, 2012 (1 comment)
Hi,I disagree points 4,5 and 7 completely.Let’s take point 4.SEO company can even be run by a small group of people.For creating forum profiles,social bookmarking and submitting to directories is not a big deal but time consumption may be higher.Half of the SEO sites is run by an individual or a very small group.Let’ take point number 5,SEO companies need not have big client’s.It doesn’t mean they are failure.Point number 7 is totally wrong.People who blog,do it to advertise their product in all possible crappy ways.They do it to attract customers.They give unusual discounts and all shit.You cant expect a big company to come and beg in forums and blogs to buy their service.If you want you should contact them.There is also a hidden point in this,People who blog are those whose SEO websites are not coming there in google search results or they are shown a way behind other sites.My point is why the hell should I believe those people who can’t bring their sites to good ranking and promise to do so for our sites?
Am I right?Debate is open..