Your PR Team Isn’t Tracking These Metrics …But They Should Be

Web analytics are still almost completely ignored or misunderstood by (most) public relations professionals. If you have a PR firm, I’d love to hear what data they report, and better yet, how they’re using it to make decisions.
I’m willing to bet the majority of agencies and client-side PR pros aren’t really paying attention to their web analytics packages, establishing conversion goals and deftly slicing and dicing data via advanced segments.
While at the digital agency, I had access to reports from a variety of PR firms: boutique to massive. And I was in shock looking at what metrics most of them reported (or didn’t report). That was actually one of the reasons I was compelled to leave the pure digital consultancy and join LEWIS PR, a firm which runs both digital-specific and traditional PR programs. As a data geek I was excited for what could be unlocked on both sides of the spectrum.
At LEWIS, we use web, search and social analytics in some interesting ways for clients. I’m not going to share all of them today because the specific mix of metrics you use to trend results and make decisions is going to be different for each brand. But I will share a few to get you thinking.
1. Referring sources (high traffic and conversion)
This is ridiculously simple to report and use to make decisions. You can do this right now. Just log into Google Analytics / Omniture (if your PR firm / team doesn’t have access: wow, just wow) and access referring sources.
Let’s have a look with a sample site – I’ve circled the media sending the site traffic:

If more media placements that send web traffic is a goal, all you need to do next is analyze what they linked to and why they linked there by slicing / dicing the data. From there, you can easily see what content you created that was successful at attracting traffic from media.
It’s easy from there to get iterative and create the next version of that piece of content. Or, maybe a guest post you drafted is sending lots of good traffic. Now you know it’s worth the time to craft another one for that site. Or go back to your media database to do more research and approach other sites in the same vein. Rinse, repeat and build sustainable returns on referral traffic and links.
But why stop at visits? PR people can now go deeper – why not also look at what types of media convert highly, then refine your outreach accordingly?
With goals setup, you can easily see how well organic media traffic converts based on each goal:

And remember, everyone can get to conversion, even if you’re not directly selling anything on your website. If you can’t do this, it means you’re not trying hard enough.
2. Branded search engine traffic
Your SEO and inbound marketing team should be focused on increasing non-branded traffic specifically. Savvy PR teams are also celebrating success here and fleshing out unique, useful and updated content on client (or their brand) websites / blogs to create long term value.
But even if your PR team hasn’t ever touched your website, they should be reporting on and showing the impact of their efforts on branded search engine traffic. This is a metric multiple teams can celebrate and use as an indicator of program success. It’s really simple: setup an advanced segment in analytics that includes the brand name / permutations. Now every month, you can trend brand awareness along with other key metrics and see how things shake out:

Of course, search engine brand awareness is just one indicator of success for building a brand, but it’s a pretty good one based on current user behavior and should be standard in marketing and PR dashboards.
3. Inbound links
Most PR firms know to put inbound links in press releases. Some even understand to use anchor text links that follow an SEO sitemap and help provide context to search engines (and users). But few actually track link metrics (volume, diversity and quality) let alone use link data to inform decision making. Sad in both cases because for many, a PR firm is their number 1 link / social signal generator. In nearly all cases though, they’re building this all too critical equity blindly.
Tools like SEOmoz Open Site Explorer or Majestic SEO are aimed at search engine optimization professionals, but there is a wealth of information for PR professionals as well: both to prove success of programs and conduct research (have you actually looked at your competitor’s link profile?).
These are just 3 examples of metrics PR pros should be using. And that’s the point, there is so much more I don’t have enough time to go through it all in one post.
Your PR team should no longer be operating in the dark: they should be equally as data-driven as any of your other marketing groups. Sophisticated PR pros are already here: reporting on a specific mix of metrics and using them to show results and make decisions. If your team isn’t, it means they’re late. Get them up to speed today.
image credit: Shutterstock






Deub replied | Oct 13, 2011 (2 comments)
Dig the quick PR metrics insights. Has your firm added “heat maps” as a leading indicator lately? I am just starting to play with CrazyEgg analytics and wondered what the current sentiment is here. Is there another provider you would recommend for something like heat maps?
Adam Singer replied | Oct 13, 2011 (597 comments)
Yes we look at heatmaps for template optimization. Although today’s post is discussing metrics for PR, specifically :)
andrew replied | Oct 16, 2011 (42 comments)
Get them up to speed today … or, get rid of them today. Not to be overly negative, but if this is the type of thing a PR team deems unimportant, they are well on their way to becoming a former PR team.
Christine replied | Oct 24, 2011 (1 comment)
Hi Adam,
Thanks for posting. PR firms should most definitely pay attention to these metrics, as they add quantifiable results to campaigns. I’d love to hear your thoughts on platforms that manage influencer campaigns that measure not only “engagement” but also have an impact on SEO and click-through-rates.
Christine Kim
Halogen YouCast
Sami Katzenberg replied | Nov 2, 2011 (9 comments)
Great post. As a PR grad student, I’m just starting to learn about these metrics and how valuable they can be. There is no point in paying someone to take care of social media if you can’t prove it’s actually helping your company.
Andrew Bruce Smith replied | Nov 3, 2011 (2 comments)
You are right. In the UK last year I addressed a group of around 70 senior PR directors from a host of blue chip organisations. I asked how many of them used data from Google Analytics or similar to help shape their PR programmes. Not a single hand went up. I think more are starting to grasp the treasure trove of data they are probably sitting on – but still a lot of work to do.
Even those that have begun using GA are still falling prey to basic errors – such as not filtering out visits from their own employees. One firm I looked at was about to make significant PR and marketing investments based on the apparent level of traffic being driven by brand search terms. However, when I filtered out their own employees visits, the traffic figure fell by one third. Turns out employees were using Google navigationally to reach their own company website. So they had a false sense of their brand position via search.
Still – means plenty of work for those of us who bring combined PR and analytics experience ;)
Andrew Bruce Smith replied | Nov 3, 2011 (2 comments)
Oh. And what about multi-channel funnels in Google Analytics? Now PRs can see both direct and indirect impact that PR activity may have had on a concrete conversion event. Or the addition of real-time a la Chartbeat?
As you may have guessed, this is a subject I’ve been harping on about for some time:
http://blog.escherman.com/?s=google+analytics
CHarlotte ULvros replied | Nov 3, 2011 (2 comments)
Excellent post thank you. What is so great with the endless possibility of measurement in today’s digital PR world is the fact that you get all analytics in real time. You don’t have to wait for press clippings to come in etc. Just like Adam stated today you can see who read it, where they are located, where they found your PR content, what information they took part of (text, image, video, document) and even what they re-published or re-wrote etc etc. Shortly, you are able to get all the metrics to improve your PR-work immediately.
Google anaytics is great. But my experience is that it can be a bit scary to dig into for a PR agency or a PR-inhouse communicator. Unfortunately usually the webmaster sits on the login and isn’t always to keen on sharing the insight. But of course there is shortcuts :) Plenty of companies (and yes I represent one of them – Mynewsdesk – but are plenty more out there) actually include extensive analytics in a digital newsroom). The analytics is targeted soley for the PR work giving PR-communicators or agencies finished reports with all the metrics upper management or clients can wish for. These reports can be accessed daily, weekly, monthly etc – all on the agency’s/ communicators own terms. It’s a great way to follow up and improve on campaigns and ongoing PR-work without having to learn/ or not having the time for Google Analytics.
More on the subject on measurement – here is a good blogpost on the same subject: Measuring Digital PR – Part 1: Why Measure? http://www.mynewsdesk.com/uk/pressroom/newsdesk/blog_post/view/measuring-digital-pr-part-1-why-measure-9181
Hugh Anderson replied | Nov 3, 2011 (1 comment)
Fascinating debate. I agree with all of the comments about the metrics opportunity in this area and have followed Andrew’s commentary on it for some time. One challenge: is the biggest issue one of education? i.e. the PR’s are showing a willingness to measure and use GA, but their clients just don’t get it yet.
One further post on the subject for those interested enough – from the guru that is Avinash Kaushik:
http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/best-social-media-metrics-conversation-amplification-applause-economic-value/
James Crawford replied | Nov 12, 2011 (1 comment)
Like the man said, if your agency is not doing this then ‘wow, just wow.’