Ragu Pasta Sauce Leaves Bad Taste With Social Media Users

[Above image: basically, how Ragu portrayed Dads in the kitchen ...and in return how web commenters / Dad bloggers portrayed Ragu's social media team.]
We’ve waited a long time for this day. Finally, a sauce brand has made a social media faux pas. It’s not every day we can blog about pasta sauce, but when we can it tastes good. Overly processed, would survive nuclear winter, tomato-like sauce kind of good.
Wait, what? We’re blogging about pasta sauce? Yes because we want you to learn from their mistakes …so you don’t stir up the same ill will from the web. And any day we can make sauce-related puns is a good day. We’ll try for some more, keep reading.
So say you’re Ragu (or their agency) and you decide it’s time to get involved in the social web. What next?
Uh, duh. Spam popular bloggers you have zero connection with to check out your super awesome videos, of course!
Ragu sauce, which lets you follow the time-honored tradition of cutting corners in the kitchen by skipping the creative process of making your own, fresh-tasting sauce applied this shortcut to their social web efforts. Unfortunately, Ragu doesn’t understand that blogger relations is just that. Relations.
Their first artificially-flavored™ interactions with dad bloggers included spam Tweets which looked like this:

What did they link to? This video, which basically insulted everyone they linked to and opened the can of worms:
What did they earn from their spamming? A slew of negative posts, including this one from C.C. Chapman with the title: Ragu Hates Dads.
This bit from C.C. says it all about how Ragu’s actions affected him as a dad and how the brand misunderstands their audience:
As the person in my household who does all of the shopping and all of the cooking I took offense to this video. Implying that dads can only cook the simple things and Ragu is somehow going to help make that easier. Give me a break!
I’m sure there are plenty of couples out there where this might be true, but once again we have a brand who has decided to only focus on the mom side of the parenting equation and play into the stupid stereotypes that dads get pegged with all the time.
When will brands wake up to dads and the active role we play in our children’s lives. I’m sick of seeing every company that wants to have a parenting focus completely forget about the male side of the equation. I long for a brand to embrace fathers and really step up and cover both sides of parenting.
Ragu, you failed. You tried to be clever and you blew it. Whoever your agency is that told you this was a good idea should be fired because they are doing things for you that snake oil salesman are selling companies on every day and you’ve written the check for it. You should have known better. They should have served you better.
Chris Brogan’s comment in the thread below is spot on and sums this up from a marketing perspective:
Now that social media is a checkbox service offered by agencies and run by the junior associates at those agencies as part of a much larger campaign wherein which the only part of social that gets done is the pushing out of meaningless link spam, I’d like to offer that I think Ragu has no idea that you exist, let alone any sense of your cooking skills.
Their content, my friend, does not rule.
I’ll second what Chris said. Their content was amateurish and cheesy. Their approach spammy and disingenuous. And contains just 20% of your daily allowance of sodium per half cup.
But should we expect any different? Ragu isn’t actually social – in any sense of the word. I couldn’t find a single human being behind their social marketing efforts. Not sometimes, it is always the sauce talking: Twitter, Facebook and their website:

The only thing we can conclude is the sauce is a robot, has become sentient, or they’re a faceless corporate entity. Which do you think? I’m really hoping for robot. Finally: sauce by robots, for robots. Because there are no people here: either behind the product or marketing (you can’t even find a “team” page on their website).
But who cares about people when the sauce is fulfilling his master plan to pit Dads against Moms in the kitchen. Because …their brand experts have decided this is how we sell more sauce!
So mixed in with the mommy and contest Tweets you’d expert to see for a brand like Ragu, you now have a conversation which looks something like this:

And …radio silence on Ragu’s part. They didn’t respond to any of it. They also didn’t respond to the 220+ comments on C.C.’s thread, or any of the other bloggers who wrote about it. Will they respond here?
We can only conclude their silence is due to one (or multiple) of the following:
1. They can’t respond because someone up top refuses to let them be social (even though they are using social channels). Basically they’re hamstrung themselves and probably should have thought a bit more before taking a “checkbox approach” to social media, as Chris Brogan articulates.
2. They can respond but they have no idea what to say and lack crisis communications plan.
3. They’re clueless we’re even talking about them.
4. They’re waiting to think of even better sauce-related puns.
Either way, by participating in social but not actually willing to get involved in discussions, they’re basically setting themselves up for the above situation (similar to the previous McDonalds example we shared). This is a potential outcome for any brand who registers a social channel but ignores users. You can’t half commit.
But in this case, it actually has nothing to do with the product making it even more shameful. Here they are just participating to take (have people talk about them) and not give anything back or build any real connections with consumers. Actually now that I think about it, we’ve given them what they asked for. We’re talking about Ragu – that’s what they wanted, right? Any mention is a good mention? But as Gini Dietrich wisely notes: there is such a thing as bad PR.
Comments are open if you’re feeling saucy.






C.C. Chapman replied | Sep 29, 2011 (1 comment)
Just got off the phone with someone from the company as I read this post. So they have followed up, but….well…I’m not sure they listened.
Adam Singer replied | Sep 29, 2011 (597 comments)
Nice that they followed-up with you. Shame they didn’t listen … but they also still have said nothing to your community and the other bloggers / Dads they’ve started conversations with / potentially upset.
David Meerman Scott replied | Sep 29, 2011 (2 comments)
C.C. Next time I see you I’d love a download on that conversation. Was it the company? Or the agency?
Good analysis Adam!! It’s the first I’ve written about pasta sauce too.
Alex Weiser replied | Sep 29, 2011 (1 comment)
This is hilarious. The question is: how long before all companies are 100% in with social? Or will there always be some companies that refuse to adjust?
Karen replied | Sep 29, 2011 (1 comment)
I keep wondering how much longer social tools have to be around for brands to wake up, do their homework (so they know their audience) and then stop fearing the actual social part of the equation.
As I pointed out yesterday elsewhere, I was insulted on behalf of my husband who is not clueless and can cook as well. The “hopeless dad/man” bit is old and tired and needs to go away.
John Russell (@John_D_Russell) replied | Sep 29, 2011 (1 comment)
Karen, as long as advertisers keep believing the whole “mom makes all the purchase decisions for the household,” the “hopeless dad/man” stereotype will never cease. Companies like Ragu need to wake up! Guys can cook too!
Samantha replied | Sep 29, 2011 (15 comments)
Any organization still subscribing to the ‘any press is good press’ idea is in for a world of hurt, especially in the social media sphere.
John Trader replied | Sep 29, 2011 (2 comments)
It boggles the mind that with all the social media blunders, examples and failed attempts that exist for companies to learn from that bumbling and stumbling like this are still a fact of life. I am amazed at their silence too, even if this was a direct ploy to attract more media attention they at least should have taken the opportunity to say “fooled you! In actuality we really know what we are doing we just wanted to see if you were paying attention.”
Eric Swayne replied | Sep 29, 2011 (1 comment)
What boggles my mind is how EASY this would have been to prevent. It just doesn’t take much time to at least Google the Twitter handles of each one you’re sending to, just to see if there’s any landmines out there.
If you’ll pardon the shameless plug, I put together some thoughts on the basic Social Research they could have done to save themselves the headache:
http://eswayne.com/post/10768817681/how-a-little-social-research-could-have-saved-ragu-a
Adam Singer replied | Sep 29, 2011 (597 comments)
Thanks for the link Eric – very interesting. Not shameless at all – useful!
Gini Dietrich replied | Sep 29, 2011 (11 comments)
There IS such a thing as bad publicity and that, alone, makes me nuts about the whole thing. Like you, I’ve been watching it all unfold and I’ve read CC’s three blog posts. I appreciate that Ragu (and their agencies) are listening. Perhaps it’s time to pull the video and go back to the drawing board?
Anghel Paras replied | Sep 29, 2011 (1 comment)
I happen to be a better cook than my girlfriend, and even I took a little offense to this even if I’m not a dad. Mostly all of the men in my family are pretty darn good cooks as well. Reinforcing the stereotype that men cannot cook? C’mon Ragu… it’s 2011.
Jack@TheJackB replied | Sep 29, 2011 (1 comment)
I am not convinced that they are aware of what is going on. But I wouldn’t be surprised if they didn’t have a clue about how to respond.
Ragu Brand Team replied | Sep 30, 2011 (1 comment)
Appreciate your take on the discussion, here’s our take: http://on.fb.me/nSN2ul
I hope you’ll change your mind (at least on the robot comment). If you spend a little time on our Facebook page- go back a bit through our posts and you’ll see it’s very much a real discussion with real people. But if we were a robot- what kind of robot would we be? C3PSauce maybe?
Jim Doria replied | Sep 30, 2011 (1 comment)
The thing is – their NUMBERS probably tell them that Moms do run the show. Quantitatively – that is, in speaking one-way to a mass audience – the opinions of dads (like all individuals and most smaller groups of consumers) are negligible to a large, established consumer brand that has always thought in terms of large, monolithic audience media – print, broadcast, and other traditional advertising channels.
The power of social media to amplify the voices of individuals and small groups is going to catch a lot of brands flat-footed, when their entire organization and culture is built around “mass” marketing. I almost feel bad for them – it must be like coming to the office one day and finding all the furniture and office equipment on the ceiling.
Mitch Mitchell replied | Sep 30, 2011 (1 comment)
Interesting stuff; I totally missed this one. I have a couple of thoughts about it, not quite the norm.
One, when did dads get to the point where they started getting insulted over stuff like this? I mean, have you seen all the commercials showing stupid dads?
Two, everyone’s blaming Ragu when we all know that it was the marketing company that pitched it to them. Companies in general don’t really understand social media, and they look to these PR companies they hire to help them out with it. True, they approved it, but I’m betting they were thinking “hey, we make moms look good and therefore we’re doing something great.”
Three, I will say that the campaign definitely wasn’t thought out well enough, but that’s the world we’re moving into. I’m not sure there are many commercials these days that aren’t going to offend someone. Heck, I read where someone was offended by the hamsters in Honda commercials; goofy as sin. But this points out why companies probably need to start looking more at social media specialists to help them out.
And four, I love Ragu; that is all. lol
Justin Goldsborough replied | Oct 1, 2011 (2 comments)
Wow. Just wow. Heard about the Ra-goof all week long, and I still haven’t stopped shaking my head.
This is not a social media issue. This is a corporate culture issue. And another company giving PR a very bad name. I wonder if the person who sent those tweets also runs up to people at offline networking events, shouts a key message and throws a business card. If so, I wonder how effective it is. Well, I think I know.
It’s not just that Ragu doesn’t understand social media. It’s that they don’t understand people. It’s lazy. And it hurts PR’s rep, which many of us are trying to improve. Good stuff, Adam. Cheers!
Sydney @ Social Dynamics replied | Oct 2, 2011 (22 comments)
That’s insulting, and honestly, these days, dads are much more capable in the kitchen, we’re not in the 1950′s anymore. They could have made a clever and unobstrusive campaign, but they just completely tanked this one.
Ed replied | Oct 3, 2011 (1 comment)
I looked at the video and read a bunch on this over the weekend and i’m not sure what the fuss is all about. My takeaway from the video is that when dad makes dinner, it’s fun (as opposed to when mom does) and that mom’s tend to over think the dinner experience. As the primary cook, my wife tends to tends to behave the same way the women in video’s husbands behave.
From a social media perspective the outrage seems to be overblown. Ragu did a campaign targeting mom’s and sent it to a few dad bloggers for input and to create dialog. I think their biggest failing was not in the outreach or the targeting, but in how they reached out. Seems weak at best. I wouldn’t blame them for targeting mom’s in a campaign though. Mom’s control 2.6 trillion in spending – and that’s regardless of who brings home the paycheck. I credit Ragu for trying to bring dad’s into the loop. Hopefully they’ll do it better in the future.
I think if Ragu is smart they should capitalize on the moment. I see the goal of social media to start a dialog – and this campaign did that far greater than Ragu could have ever imagined. Dad’s are passionate (and can rock in the kitchen in i do say so myself) which is good for everyone. I think before calling this a social blunder we need to see what Ragu does now that they’ve created the dialog. Do they keep Dad in the conversation or not. That will be the telling moment. If they don’t, shame on them. Either way, i really don’t feel like they owe me an apology. And i certainly can’t understand how anyone would think that Ragu hates Dad’s. Seems like a disproportional response and ironically, one piece of advice i read was “Don’t Overreact” which seemed to be given but not taken.
Good luck Ragu on learning how to better reach out to people and inviting them into the conversation. Just remember, when Dad makes dinner is more fun. :-)
John replied | Oct 15, 2011 (1 comment)
This technique of selling to family members “who [should] know better” is not new. It’s done all the time on TV by talking to kids and referring to their parents as clueless idiots. Ragu has been replaced in my vernacular by Prego…my dollar(s) vote for me.
Peter I. replied | Oct 25, 2011 (1 comment)
I’m not sure if the offense by Ragu is as bad as the Twitterati bullying that they received. If @ replying six bloggers is spamming then I think we’ve won the war against spam. A couple of the people quoted in this post write a fair amount of sponsored posts and have shown signs that they’d be very interested in this kind of content (especially if you pay them). I think this kind of manufactured backlash that is so common with the Power 150 set is really just a new kind of trolling. Maybe your family is the exception to the audience Ragu is speaking to but did they really do anything offensive? I think this is just an extension of the many mommy blogger controversies, which had more to do with just finding something new to post than genuine outrage.
Duncan replied | Dec 6, 2011 (1 comment)
This advertising by Sainsburys in UK shows the pole opposite approach to Ragu – dads and kids cooking together. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FzcSLpgTTI