SEO And Social Media Myths Busted

As a consultant I hear a lot about social media and SEO: at conferences, from marketers, by entrepreneurs. And unfortunately, while well-intentioned there is a fair amount of misinformation that continues to spread.
So today let’s debunk some common SEO and social media myths that continue to perpetuate:
Myth 1: meta keywords are important to SEO
I know, I know, who still thinks this? Trust me, it is still lingering. And it frustrates me a lot because Google even has a blog post that you only need to read the title of to get: Google does not use the keywords meta tag in web ranking.
Sadly it is not just marketers who keep insisting we “optimize the meta keywords” on pages, it is web designers too. I’ve seen enough new websites where the design team launches it and takes the time to flesh out meta keywords but doesn’t even bother with the title tag or meta description. It is actually in my experience the rare web designer who considers search. Sad.
Myth 2: age of website and age of links are factors for SEO
Rand Fishkin does a good job debunking this one and I’m inclined to agree. There are enough new sites (i.e. Quora) that do well in SERPs and have a link profile that’s a lot fresher than older sites. I’ve seen it in my own experience marketing start-ups. Also logically it doesn’t make sense for any of the engines to do this: it would tilt the web in favor of legacy sites and links and not inspire fresh content to be created. And fresh content makes the engines far more valuable than old links.
Myth 3: blogs / self-hosted websites are dead
Another one that continues to propagate is that self-hosted web properties / communities are dead. This one is just silly. We share plenty of examples of what happens when you yield your presence to the stream, and the people propagating the notion that self-publishing is dead usually have motivations behind it. Savvy digital marketers understand you need to self-publish forever. In fact, I’ll say the opposite of dead: it’s never been a better time to start a blog.
Myth 4: we suffer from information overload
Anyone who spouts this one simply does a poor job at staying organized or isn’t managing their RSS reader, email inbox, or social client well. Louis Gray does a great job debunking this. And anyway, the reality is you don’t need to read everything that happens in a given industry. Setup the right filtering, selectively choose who and what sites you opt into, setup the right media monitoring and ruthlessly unsubscribe / unfriend / unfollow the junk.
Myth 5: you shouldn’t automate syndication of micro content
This one always gets people up in arms. They proclaim you can’t automate Twitter. Even a little bit. Anywhere. Of course, this is silly: there is no “right” or “wrong” use of Twitter or any social network so long as it’s useful and makes sense to users. Any given post syndicated via Seth’s blog auto feed gets more ReTweets than most real people on Twitter. You don’t even have to be Seth Godin to do this: I decided to conduct an experiment and create a feed for content instead of sending it through a person and the opt-in rate was the same. Automation aside, if what you’re doing is valuable people don’t care how it’s done even if pundits complain.
Myth 6: social media is difficult / impossible to measure
Ummmm, ok. The real problem here isn’t that social media is difficult to measure. The problem is the people saying this generally aren’t fluent in any online marketing metrics. They immediately call into question social channels, but I’m willing to bet if you push these people on how their existing website performs they won’t be able to tell you. Or if they can, they’re not actually using that data to make decisions. This stuff is very possible to measure (we do it for all our clients at LEWIS) and everyone can get to conversion.
Myth 7: our customers don’t use social
I’ve actually heard this one. In 2011. Really. Do we even need to comment on this? 17.1 billion searches monthly (social content taps this if you’re smart). More than 800 million users on Facebook alone. But this is silly anyway, generally people saying this haven’t even polled their own customers to find out. Or researched their category in social. Or considered trying to be the leader in their category in the space and attract new audiences. Usually they are just people who are afraid of change.
This is, of course, just a short list. Comments are open: what myths do you keep hearing that should be debunked?
And for your moment of zen, here’s the Mythbusters YouTube special:









BJ Mendelson replied | Sep 26, 2011 (5 comments)
I think the issue with #6 there isn’t that they don’t know how to measure success on the different platforms out there. The issue is that “social media” is a useless buzzword that generally gets used by people looking to sell them something. And since the meaning of the buzzword changes depending on who is doing the selling, there’s no way you can measure success with it.
Here’s some proof: If you were to swap out “social media” with “The Web”, “The Internet”, or these days “Facebook”, you’ve already provided a more clear picture than most marketers provide, and that kills a lot of the confusion.
So, I wouldn’t put the blame on people not understanding the metrics as much as on the people selling them nonsense and hype that can never be measured.
Adam Singer replied | Sep 26, 2011 (563 comments)
Agreed with you – in fact, we wrote an article that covers this very subject years ago: http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/12/27/social-media-buzzword/
BJ Mendelson replied | Sep 26, 2011 (5 comments)
Good to know, but again, I have to stress not to put the blame so much on customers and them not knowing any better (or not knowing what to do with their data). (See: Myth 6) That’s troublesome to me, and a bit unfair to them.
Pete Johnson replied | Sep 26, 2011 (1 comment)
Great article, I hope the right people read it. Like many in this group, I fear your missive is falling on “been there, done that” ears.
But, in the hopes that we have a chance to touch more than the SEO and social geeks, I’d like to ad one more: “nobody looks for my business online.” We were courting a packaging company, that statement came up. From literally hundreds of relevant keywords, we picked just one “buy” term with over 3800 exacts a month. Yep… nobody searches for your business online.
Gainesville Health & Fitness Centers replied | Sep 27, 2011 (3 comments)
In regards to No. 1, I’d say *META KEYWORDS ARE IMPORTANT TO SEO* in that going through the process of whittling down everything you’d like to be known for into only the most important words is a terrific process for identifying the keywords you should make sure you place throughout your site in the most critical spots and with the best density.
The other myths, though, are the dumbest things I’ve ever heard. I hope my competitors believe them.
Adam Singer replied | Sep 27, 2011 (563 comments)
Meta keyword is an irrelevant field. You are thinking of having a keyword glossary, which of course *is* important to SEO. But the keyword meta tag isn’t :)
Gainesville Health & Fitness Centers replied | Sep 27, 2011 (3 comments)
Irrelevant field. Important process.
Gainesville Health & Fitness Centers replied | Sep 27, 2011 (3 comments)
There, in each page, a list of the keywords that are most important for you to work in. Keeps the eye on the prize.
Adam Singer replied | Sep 27, 2011 (563 comments)
Also – please use your real name (or just a less spammy pseudonym if you want to keep anonymity) for comments on a go-forward. Your current name is very spammy – I am allowing it in the hopes that you’ll use your real name in the future. But don’t plan to approve more comments with your spam name. Links in the comments section are no-followed so you’re not helping anything.
Brian Russell replied | Sep 28, 2011 (1 comment)
Myth 8: No-follow links are worthless and unhelpful.
Adam Singer replied | Sep 28, 2011 (563 comments)
When you use a spammy username like “Gainesville Health & Fitness Centers” it is. It’s spam Brian – forget SEO for a second: this thread does not relate to Gainesville Health & Fitness centers. I’m willing to bet you none of the rest of the community finds it useful :)
But thanks for the follow-up comment and using a name!
Via Madison replied | Sep 27, 2011 (1 comment)
I totally agree that almost everyone are into social media these days. At least almost everyone in anyone’s target market, that is. And I’m relieved to read that self publishing isnt dead yet–gives hope to newbies around here like me..thanks
Brian Lis replied | Sep 28, 2011 (3 comments)
I agree with everything you’ve said in general. Great job summarizing a lot of questions I field quite often. The only thing that’s a little confusing is Myth 2. From what I understand the age of the site is irrelevant. I suspect fresh content and file dates probably help overall SEO scores (very minor). But on the date I believe its a big factor in domain names. Older domain names get better SEO traction then new ones, me thinks. Domain names tend to be one of the biggest factors in SEO. So when purchasing a domain name one might consider an older domain available resale vs. a new domain name that’s some convoluted mess of company and keyword mix. Perhaps someone can verify / collaborate the importance of domain name age.
Jon Svensson replied | Sep 29, 2011 (1 comment)
Brian,
There are a few things going on here:
1) All else equal, the age of the domain itself does not seem to be a factor. It’s fair to think that an older domain will have had more SEO work done on it, has been linked to more, etc. and will therefore rank higher, but it will be because of those additional factors, not the mere fact that time has past.
2) Domain-level keyword usage is a strong factor in SEO (and an effective way to lay a solid SEO foundation right from the start), but I’d caution against connecting this to the age of the domain. Also, I’ll note that in the absence of a keyword-rich domain isn’t an SEO death sentence; there are plenty of other significant factors that are much more in the user’s control and can overcome a weak domain (from a keyword perspective).
Here’s a great discussion on the topic from SEOmoz http://www.seomoz.org/blog/age-of-site-and-old-links-whiteboard-friday
Brian Lis replied | Sep 29, 2011 (3 comments)
Thanks for the follow up and the additional reading. I’ll check that out. Solid.
Karen replied | Dec 21, 2011 (2 comments)
Hey Brian,
buying an existing domain has no real SEO value unless you are able to buy it before it goes back into the heap – in other words, if it still has live links pointing to it, and ideally if it still has some relevance to the new site you want to build on it.
Otherwise you might as well start fresh, assuming you can get a decent domain that is relevant to the site you are creating.
The other issue is around freshness, which to my understanding has been incorporated into the Google algorithm since Caffeine – making new content more easily found. However, I have noticed that fresh content relevant to my clients, eg a release I have just sent out that gets online traction, ranks high for the first few days, then drops down and the more established content – like the site itself, starts to rank more strongly again. So to really maximise the freshness factor, it would be appropriate to be regularly putting out new content, which is of course what we all recommend anyway, right?
Brian Lis replied | Dec 22, 2011 (3 comments)
“we all recommend anyway, right?” LOL yes your right. But getting a business to blog more then once a quarter is unlikely. I don’t get why they pay someone like myself to make beautiful websites with all the functionality they can handle and refuse to blog. /sad
Mitch Mitchell replied | Sep 28, 2011 (4 comments)
I like these, but I will say something about #7. There really are mediums that aren’t using social media all that well. The health care field is still in the dark ages in general. Very few hospitals and even fewer physicians understand the power of social media. And for someone like me, who is a health care consultant, I find that though I’m ranked very high for my particular search terms, I get almost no calls because health care professionals & hospitals aren’t looking online for someone who can provide the services they need. So, it may be a myth in general, but specifically it’s not a myth for many industries.
Alexandra Reichenbach, Editor, Platform Magazine replied | Sep 29, 2011 (2 comments)
This blog caught my attention immediately. Social media serves as one of the most popular ways to find information and keep up with current trends. I thought it was really interesting to read about the various “myths” that continue to circulate about measuring the effectiveness of social media. How can people believe that it is nearly impossible to measure when it is a source we depend on every day? I can see how people may be a bit confused, seeing that it is a very different kind of “conversational” source. But, people in this day and age need to think innovatively and realize that the measurement of effectiveness is far from impossible.
Sydney @ Social Dynamics replied | Oct 2, 2011 (22 comments)
True, social media isn’t hard to measure, it’s actualy one of the few tools that can you give you an instant insight on how effective your campaign really is. If you get responses and a spike in traffic, then there you go.
Barrel Horses replied | Oct 3, 2011 (1 comment)
Does Myth 2 mean that Google doesn’t put a penalty on new domains?
Ray Creations replied | Nov 30, 2011 (2 comments)
Though I agree with most of what you are saying. However, I feel that age of a site definitely matters for better rankings. You say that some newer sites are doing better older sites. So? If the older sites don’t do anything about optimization, they definitely won’t do good. But if they did they will have a little edge over the new site that is also putting in just as much effort.
Karen replied | Dec 22, 2011 (2 comments)
We recommend our clients to aim for a blog post per week – some make it, some don’t but we also write some content posts for them as part of monthly retainer work. I suggest if it is an issue, getting a writer to have a 20 minute call with client each week and getting key points to craft a blog post from. Then writing it up and getting sign off before publishing. Takes the pressure off the client.