Is The Internet Accelerating The Disruption Of Religion?

We’ve long since made the point that religion is one of the best examples of the efficacy of marketing. Take your personal beliefs out of the picture and think critically about it for a moment: people are persuaded to believe in a story and follow a group of others without any real evidence. Other than marketing.
How so? Religion is in essence an ideavirus, one children are infected with at a young age by their parents. As noted in my previous thread on religion and marketing, here are some commonalities between religions and businesses from a marketing viewpoint:
- Countless religions the world over have packaged a compelling story which has been improved and edited for generations.
- Religious leaders wrap their story in messaging and jargon that feels legitimate to many people.
- Religion offers both tangible benefits (community) and intangible benefits (promise of afterlife) at both a monetary and time cost to you.
- Religion successfully rallies people the world over to publicly brand themselves as subscribers and work without any compensation as word of mouth marketers to attract new members to their religious brand of choice.
- Religions have logos.
- People gather at their religion of choice’s physical location with frequency.
- People celebrate during established days during which they devote time, make purchases and give resources to their religion of choice.
- Other viewpoints and even science are told to be wrong, because questioning truth has been blocked by design.
- Religion fights change to keep itself relevant by updating or changing its messages, its appearance and the manner it spreads.
I know this is a taboo subject but that’s exactly the reason we don’t shy away from it here. It needs more discussion in the context of marketing. Scared of that? You’re in the wrong industry. In an internet-powered world, we need to be closer to sociologists, taking a data-driven approach to what we do and be comfortable analyzing what is happening around us. This needs to happen before we infuse any creativity or emotion with our ideas.
Science has already disproven much of the religious beliefs that were previously widespread. I’d argue the internet is accelerating this and as marketers we need to understand how and why all ideas spread throughout society: especially those that get disrupted.
Here are two ways I see the web disrupting religion:
1. Splitting the world vertically by interest
As a digitally-savvy generation grows up connected to each other, to research and to a myriads of opinions, we are nurturing a media-literate culture capable of critical thinking and independent decision making. Such a group is less likely to accept what they are taught as fact without evidence.
I’ve noticed this subjectively in my own experiences in life: it is becoming increasingly difficult to find those my own age who attend religious services on a regular basis or who believe in a religion as a pivotal part of their life.
Instead of religion which is in a sense horizontal, the web is splitting the world and our time vertically: connecting us around common interests we are passionate about. Whether sports, music, knitting or other interest, we now have a mechanism to create communities around anything. Not simply a common religious belief that was passed down to by our tribes. We are breaking down our culture on a more specific level of interest in a fashion that is location agnostic.
2. Building a database of referential content
Through link journalism, the web is spreading the notion of referential (verifiably so) content. Despite the media’s unfortunate rush to publish information, scientists, researchers and professors are making available a volume of content in the public domain never before possible. Individuals and subject matter experts are adding context. Future generations will benefit from a more threaded and nested library of content that is instantly accessible. Including a history of current and past religious beliefs alongside scientific data.
If you dig even a bit into the past, our society had common beliefs that have been proven wrong. For example, we used to think some people were witches, Ra was the Sun god, leeches cured illness, etc. It is my hypothesis that an open-information society will cause belief in religion to eventually tip to the side or irrelevance in the future as we build upon the information available to us. It may take several decades, or perhaps even a century due to how deep religion is ingrained in our society, but I think we will eventually move away from it.
As a marketer, I think it is a fascinating time to be alive and watch as something which previously reigned supreme gets disrupted. I also think that is half the fun of the web and the world we live in: creative destruction and replacing past beliefs, companies and trends with new ones.
I’m curious what you think and was hoping to engage the community here – regardless of belief – in a discussion on how the internet is affecting religion.
image credit: Shutterstock






Das M replied | Aug 8, 2011 (1 comment)
.
Thanks for bringing this up. The global reality is changing and I am an optimist.
Sanskrit is one of the most original languages. It is called “language of the Gods” and so it might be relevant here. “Matham” is the word for what we cal religion. Every sound in Sanskrit has a meaning and as sounds are formed into words, they also form a meaning for that word. That is how Sanskrit works… very basic as 0 and 1 are for digital technology.
In any case the Sanskrit word “Matham” (or religion) translates into “opinion” in English.
It is a mere view of reality, that is, according to the ancient Seers !
This is very important as we are in the middle of a major power shift towards the east. Technology is dissolving barriers as well. Switch to east is also a shift in a belief systen that is circular (as opposed to linear with a proposed end in sight).
I am watching these changes with great interest.
.
Julius Campbell replied | Aug 9, 2011 (3 comments)
Adam, you said:
“As a digitally-savvy generation grows up connected to each other, to research and to a myriads of opinions, we are nurturing a media-literate culture capable of critical thinking and independent decision making. Such a group is less likely to accept what they are taught as fact without evidence.”
With this statement you appear to be suggesting that the ideas supported by the best evidence will win, leaving no room for religion. I disagree. The very best salespeople know that in order to persuade people to buy their product or service, they have to engage them emotionally. People make decisions emotionally and they rationalize them logically. The internet makes a wealth of information available to everyone, but it also empowers people to customize their own information experience based on their own interests. People will seek out evidence that supports their emotionally-held beliefs. People reject evidence that goes against their beliefs as being inherently illogical. The internet doesn’t change that.
You also said:
“I’ve noticed this subjectively in my own experiences in life: it is becoming increasingly difficult to find those my own age who attend religious services on a regular basis or who believe in a religion as a pivotal part of their life.”
Adam, you’re still young. I don’t mean this condescendingly at all – I respect your experience and wisdom. However, in my experience, I have noticed that life events – and the emotions that surround them – cause people to reevaluate their lives. I hypothesize that as people your age give birth to children, deal with the deaths of loved ones, face illness, go through divorce, or achieve outrageous success accompanied by a puzzling sense of emptiness, they will reevaluate their lives as well and some of them will turn to religion and it will become pivotal in their lives.
Religion will never become irrelevant. However, the internet may disrupt “established” religion because people have so many more options. I believe the internet will allow people to build religious “verticals” that have never been seen before. We may see “Christian Buddhists” or “Jewish Hindus” or any such combination in the future decades or century. This is the disruption I see made possible by the internet – not the elimination of religion.
Adam Singer replied | Aug 9, 2011 (597 comments)
Thanks for the response Julius and I appreciate your counter-opinion – interesting perspective. That’s one of the best parts of publishing online, and I’m glad to have a community that doesn’t always agree with the ideas shared.
Olu replied | Aug 9, 2011 (1 comment)
Hey, a great write up. I must say I am deeply attached to my faith, but I love and respect how you went about your opinion. I think one thing you left
out is the dilution of religion since most of them do have a certain book
which is interpreted into various ways by the custodians… How does this
work in a marketing setup with the Company, The CEO and the office worker?
Carrie replied | Aug 9, 2011 (1 comment)
I do hope you’re right Adam. Personally I think religion is about the human capacity to feel ecstasy. People who experience religious fervour think it is coming from ‘God’ – but we have this capacity within us and you and I know we can replicate that feeling through creativity and expression. My fear is that religious fervour is just being replaced by plain old fervour (i.e. UK riots) and that is easily spread through the internet and possibly much more damaging.
But you’re brave!! The last blog I posted on religion I finally deleted after several months because I was tired of trying to rationalize with irrational people.
For perspective, the first gig I ever did was with a gospel rock band who offered me a paying gig at 17. I wasn’t religious but it didn’t take long at that impressionable age to get sucked in and I became ‘born again’ brain washed. My parents (also musicians) had to stage an intervention to get me out of it and then off I went on the road with a real rock band LOL!! (they were thrilled!)
What I can tell you is that within that community they do not expose themselves to anything considered secular, so I don’t think anything anyone says to open up their world view would even be seen or heard. But there are many ways to produce a feeling of ecstasy these days that could easily replace religion for the next generation. We can only hope!
I always love your posts, thanks so much for doing what you do.
Adam Singer replied | Aug 10, 2011 (597 comments)
Cheers for the comment Carrie, we’re glad you’re enjoying being a part of the community. And never be afraid to post anything. You never have to rationalize, and there’s nothing wrong with starting discussions and questioning our world / what goes on within it.