Social And Your Team: Don’t Burn Bridges

Today I wanted wanted to start a discussion about your team members participation in social media on behalf of your brand. Specifically, I want to chat about basic philosophy of how you handle putting people forward.
I think some companies pay lip service to the notion of being a “social” brand in the sense of activating team members. Some do so as an activity simply aligned with getting as much from team members as possible, then adopting a scorched earth policy for those no longer with an organization or who a company decides should no longer represent them.
This is, in essence, burning bridges with old team members.
I do understand why some think this might be a good idea. Things change. However it is an action that is almost assured to generate negative sentiment from those people without communicating to them what your plans are. When building a community of any sort those participating personally vest themselves in that effort. So when parting ways, it should be crystal clear what happens to that past participation.
That is why if you’re going to tap team members for content, connections or other outcomes for your brand, and have them do so under their own name, it is imperative to set expectation up front. Be transparent about your process and what you plan to do in after they are gone. If you don’t do this you are setting yourself up for digital reputation issues.
To do this also marks a philosophical misunderstanding of the social web. Those people participating in social thread the past with the future. If you hurt someone’s ability to do that, it inevitably will upset them as it disrupts their natural flow of work on the web.
Remember if you tap those who participate in social media because they have a passion for their category and then take some action that later makes them feel like they have been exploited (even if this isn’t the intention) you are going to inspire the opposite reaction.
Deciding to remove / delete / change content, connections or privileges without explanation is probably about the worst thing you can do on the web. Further, you are being disingenuous to your community itself to not tell them what you’ve done. I’d highly advise against this, or if you must – talk with your team members and your community about what you’re going to do first.






andrew replied | Aug 2, 2011 (42 comments)
This is a common situation that never gets talked about – thanks for covering it. It can be an awkward conversation but an important one. Let’s be honest: people don’t stay at companies forever. They move up, they move on, they move out.
And no potential customer is going to hold it against you that someone who once, say, blogged for your agency blog, is no longer blogging for it. They realize that people do move on.
You can either embrace this (and maybe alter their author bio to be in the past-tense) or you can run from it (and confuse the interwebz).
How you choose to proceed says a lot about your confidence as an organization, your understanding of people, and really, your ethics.
Great post, Adam.
Adam Singer replied | Aug 2, 2011 (597 comments)
Your comment is spot on Andrew. My sentiment exactly.
Therese Pope replied | Aug 2, 2011 (9 comments)
This may be a little off-topic from your post, but I think that’s why it’s really important that companies have social media policies in place and that everyone in the company knows what roles they play. I understand the point you’re trying to make, but I don’t necessarily agree that it’s a good idea to have a “too many cooks in the kitchen” approach when it comes to corporate social media (especially with larger companies). I think you can get away with it for smaller companies, but it only takes one pissed off, disgruntled employee to say something negative about the company which could jeopardize the company’s reputation. This goes back to my original point – why it’s important to let employees know about the company social media policies as soon as they are hired. Most companies have now created SM polices, and these days companies can’t afford not to have a policy in place.
Sydney @ Social Dynamics replied | Aug 7, 2011 (22 comments)
It is essential in any dealings to be transparent and clear, especially since we have no excuse now for lagging information. It’s better to be straighforward about your goals and motivations, so that your team can understand your point clearly, and in the end your vision can be a reality.
SOL REPUBLIC replied | Oct 10, 2011 (2 comments)
Being from a new company, I definitely see why social media policies are really important. Everyone has their own style and etiquette for the internet. As a company, it is entirely important to set parameters and rules, especially in the virtual world, where information travels at light-speed.
Thanks for the great article and advice.