Voicemail: Basically Irrelevant In A Text-Driven World

Here’s your call to action: together we can end voicemail. Maybe that’s a bit ambitious, but at the very least collectively we can reduce it.
Despite advents in technology there is no getting around the fact that text is easily the most efficient content format there is. It’s scan-able, easily transferable, distribution scales and the processing of it can be archived or even automated. Even creating it is easier than other forms of content.
Which gets to the title of this post: why is voicemail still used?
My theory: it’s a habit of the older generation, so they keep using it. That’s the only thing keeping it alive. My generation uses it because we have to (for context, I’m 28) but we don’t really enjoy the process. The generation younger than me is going to balk at it because they’ve always been networked and had phones with text messaging.
With this in mind, I think voicemail should be added to the list of living artifacts.
Voicemail is the worst kind of inbox because it’s terribly inefficient (similar to a regular mailbox) and there is no native way to implement an organization or filtering approach. The fact that we’ve created tools to transform voicemail to text says it all: text is the superior format for transmitting time-shifted messages.
Consider some scenarios:
The “need to chat with someone in real-time”
Scenario: you call someone and they don’t pickup. But you don’t want to leave them a message, you wanted to actually chat with them in real-time to say what you need to. This happens a lot. You could leave a voicemail where the message content simply asks the person to call you back, but that wastes both your time. For the caller: have you noticed how absurdly long the process is to get to through to a cell phone voicemail? For the recipient: it is obnoxious to receive a voicemail where the only message content is “please call me back.” No one finds that useful.
Solution: modern phones have a “missed call” feature for exactly this purpose. Seeing you have missed a call from a contact should be sufficient information for us to know to call someone back. As a society, can we come together and agree on that? If it is really important, at this juncture the respectful thing to do is text your contact saying please call me back ASAP. A text message is as far as you should go – texts are high priority (and efficient) ways to transmit a quick bit of information. It is never appropriate to leave a voicemail that just says “call me back” the correct answer here is a text.
The “can you please do these 3 things?”
Scenario: you call someone to review a list of 3 things you need them to do and ensure clarity on all of them. Except the person doesn’t pick up. At this point, you could leave a voicemail outlining the 3 things you need done, but there is no accountability here and you’re really trusting someone is going to listen to the whole message.
Solution: in this case if you’re assigning tasks, skip the phone call all together and assign the task within your project management system. Note in the task if there are questions or what you’re asking is unclear, please call or email you for clarification. This minimizes the need for phone discussions and keeps your team focused on execution vs. meeting. If you’re not using a project management system you probably should be, but even still email is a superior format to assign tasks than a voicemail.
Let me demonstrate:
Tasks for Future Buzz readers:
- Dig this blog? Show your love by liking us on Facebook, following on Twitter or grabbing the feed.
- Already subscribe by RSS, Facebook or Twitter? You rock. Don’t like voicemail? Sweet, share this post with your networks.
- Finally – take a coffee break, you’ve been working hard!
Easy, right? You can scan all of that in a few seconds, quicker than I could say it to you on voicemail. It’s also faster for me to type it than to wait to reach your voicemail.
The “never responded to my email”
Scenario: you’re trying to reach a prospect or team member that never responded to your email. It’s important enough you’re calling them, but you get their voicemail so you decide to leave a message sharing in great detail what it is you need from them.
Solution: if it’s a prospect they probably received your email. If you follow up with a phone call and get their voicemail they are most likely ignoring you. Sure, they might be busy on both accounts but if you allowed sufficient time between communications and they never got back to you, wake up to reality: they’re ignoring you. The lead is cold, recycle back to marketing to nurture until deemed qualified to try again. If a team member, try re-forwarding your email and flagging with a higher priority. 99% of the time this works. If it doesn’t: this is likely a systemic issue, your processes are broken and you need a better system to manage your team.
The one time leaving voicemail might make sense is if you’re in a place you can’t quickly write an email or add a task to your project management system and you absolutely need to deliver time sensitive information to someone. Of course, this is not ideal because most people don’t place a priority on checking voicemail messages anyway due to the time-intensive nature of doing so. Instead you should work to equip your team for success ahead of time so you’re not put in a situation like the above.
Anyway – in these cases if you absolutely, positively need to deliver information to someone right now you should probably try people’s cell phones rather than leave a voicemail. If they know you’re in a situation you might need to deliver information in real-time, they’ll pick up.
I guess I’m struggling to find a use case for voicemail. It is easily my lowest priority, highest time cost inbox and really one I would rather just see go away. I’ve even thought about replacing my personal voicemail with a message such as “I am sorry but I no longer accept voicemail, please email or text me if you’d like a response” and then listing my email address.
What do you think? Voicemail: about as relevant as a fax machine?
image credit: salimfadhley via Flickr creative commons









Karen Swim replied | May 10, 2011 (2 comments)
You are right that there are generational differences in communication preferences and I believe it’s important to respect them all. I’m 47 and not a fan of voicemail but will not simply return a missed call. If you call, I prefer a brief, clear message letting me know the nature of the call and how to reach you back. My business vm follows me, sends a text and I can listen and return the call with the click of a button. Email and text can be just as inefficient, particularly when you go back and forth in what could have been handled in a 5 minute voice to voice conversation. I think the key is to learn to be efficient regardless of the medium; that is something every generation can appreciate.
Ali replied | May 10, 2011 (1 comment)
I love that now when someone calls my cellphone and leaves a voice mail, it gets translated into a text message. So not only do I have an inaccurate version of the message in text form (with often very amusing results), I still have to go into my voice mail to delete the original message. My thoughts are, if I know who you are and I’ve seen that you called, I will get back to you. If I don’t know who you are, I probably wouldn’t answer the phone anyway, so don’t leave a message. Just call me back and maybe I’ll answer.
Dave Gallant replied | May 10, 2011 (1 comment)
Good article. I’ve been feeling the same about this; that voicemails are become less relevant at we move forward with the web and technology.
Voicemails are less efficient and time consuming. Ideally, in a perfect world, I hope that there is a shift from voicemail to email.
Steven Bradley replied | May 10, 2011 (9 comments)
Sorry Adam, but I completely disagree.
I decide to give my brother a call, because I do want to talk to him. He’s not there at which point I have to decide whether or not to leave a voicemail. True he’ll know I called even if I don’t, but that’s all that gets communicated.
What I might say in the voicemail are things like when I’ll be available that day or the next for him to call me back, which will save us both time not having to play phone tag. I might also let him know I was just saying hi and no need to call me back.
Since I’ve decided to communicate that information it’s always going to be quicker to leave the voicemail at that point. It would take me longer to end the call, open up another program and type the message, not even counting that it’s simply quicker to speak a message than type it.
Also a few spoken words will always be able to communicate more than a few typed words. With voice you can often tell how someone is feeling, You can hear things they aren’t specifically saying by the tone of their voice. You simply communcate more with a human voice than you do with typed words.
We’re lucky that we have a lot of different ways to communicate with each other. Each of those ways has it’s own strengths and weaknesses. Sometimes it makes more sense to send a text or an email. Other times it makes more sense to leave a voicemail.
Robert replied | May 11, 2011 (1 comment)
So very true. Personally I don’t even bother with voice mail, half the time I don’t know who they are so can’t process the poor quality call. Just leave me a text message, email or heck… find me online. I’m all over the place.
Fax machine… some people still use that. But ultimately my wishlist:
1. IE 6 to die
2. Faxes to die
3. Voice mail to die
I’m not too picky the order mind you. :)
Thom Mitchell replied | May 11, 2011 (16 comments)
I understand the point you are trying to make, but VMs can be a call to action and are most useful when I’m driving or when the person I’m contacting is driving. Not mention that the most popular corporate email systems have the capability to translate VM to email so you can see the number of who called, if they are in your contact list you get the name and picture as well, and then their message. The accuracy isn’t 100% but it is enough to get the gist and allow me to prioritize which people to contact first. Just getting 10 texts saying call me isn’t that useful. Leaving a VM that says call me is completely useless but one that says call me about this deal that’s about to close is completely useful. Context matters.
Therese Pope replied | May 11, 2011 (9 comments)
I think it depends on your industry. As Thom mentioned, it really depends on the context. There are a lot of industries that still use vmail as a communication tool (i.e. sales, REALTORS, etc.) People still like that personal touch of hearing a ‘live’ voice even if it’s a recorded voicemail. I’m all about texting and couldn’t survive without it in my business. I am a contracted consultant for a marketing agency in Texas (I’m in California) and the owner is always on the go (not to mention the time difference). Between Skype and text messages, it makes communication far easier for us. However, I also see the detrimental impact on texting (especially the younger generation – teens, etc.) Their communication and socialization skills are stunted as a result.
I’m a copywriter and I shake my head at the horrible grammar/writing skills people use now as a result messaging (I just cringe when I receive emails from business professionals who write in text speak – yikes!) As much as I love text messaging for the convenience, it’s a double-edged sword. I think people will continue to use old school voicemail despite the technology at our fingertips. People are creatures of habits and change isn’t in their vocabulary. :)
Frugal Living replied | May 11, 2011 (1 comment)
I would say that people text on their cell phones more then they actually talk on them
Sydney @ Social Dynamics replied | May 12, 2011 (22 comments)
I dont know, I’m indifferent to its existence. I think voicemail has a purpose in a sense that you get to really feel the tone of the person (exasperated, excited). I know you can still tell the tone in a text, but I feel like we need to cling to human interactions as much as we can, and voicemails/phonecalls are essential in this process.
Alex Aguilar replied | May 12, 2011 (15 comments)
Voicemail, like faxes, are a relic from an earlier age that we can’t seem to shake. My feeling is we still use these so we don’t potentially alienate any of our customers. In any case, if you have the right set-up you can get everything, including voicemail and faxes, in your email inbox.
Personally, I am almost entirely dependent on texts, emails and IMs for all my business communication.
Gareth replied | May 13, 2011 (1 comment)
I’m not sure I agree about dropping it entirely.
I still get left messages all the time and while I can see your point, it’s still vital, IMO.
This said, I’d actually appreciate it if Orange would go as far as notifying me whenever anyone chooses to leave a voicemail message — I’ve lost track of the number of times I’ve accessed my inbox and I’ve had messages from about two weeks ago.
marisa replied | May 30, 2011 (1 comment)
My outgoing msg is much as you describe…tells callers to text or email. I have neither the time or the patience to deal with voicemail. The only exception I’m willing to make is for my aunt, and she’s 90 years old. Anyone under 90 should give up dinosaur stuff like vm and faxes already!