The Critical Few
There’s an unstated elegance about focusing on less in your marketing and PR. In fact, over time my most successful blogs, clients, and digital marketing programs were ones where we refined efforts over time to do more of less. We discovered what worked, found a formula, dialed it up and relentlessly removed the fluff.
This is counter intuitive to how most of the marketing and PR world functions. Most want to implement an ever-expanding mix of tactics over time. And while I’m not advocating you don’t experiment (experimenting within the framework of a strategy makes a lot of sense) it shows maturity of a marketer to say no to more tactics being proposed simply for the sake of doing them.
Critical few metrics
You don’t need to obsess over every metric. In fact, Avinash makes a compelling case for focusing on the critical few:
If your business was on the line how would you know things are going well or badly? Cutting through all the clutter of data, what are the metrics that are your Critical Few?
Almost all of us have too many things we measure, too many things that distract us, take away our precious time / attention.
You probably have at most three Critical Few metrics that define your existence. Do you know what they are? If you have 12 then you have too many.
Indeed – while having more KPIs is OK to have as a gauge – find your critical metrics and focus on them as priority.
Critical few platforms
Seth Godin doesn’t spend time in Twitter or Facebook. He actually doesn’t spend much time creating content with frequency anywhere other than his own blog and is focused 100% on opt-in at the source. By doing this his community does all the propagation across channels for him and he can focus on what he does best – writing and sharing ideas with us.
Seth has true leverage on the web (and in the world) by having a community that is platform agnostic. Far more than those who have multiple communities updated sporadically in other people’s platforms where there is no control over the signal to noise ratio.
Critical few words
Paul McHenry Roberts has a brilliant essay: How To Say Nothing In 500 Words. The whole essay is worth reading and drives home the point of being succinct, but one of the points made highlights the elegance of less:
Instead of stuffing your sentences with straw, you must try steadily to get rid of the padding, to make your sentences lean and tough… You dig up more real content. Instead of taking a couple of obvious points off the surface of the topic and then circling warily around them for six paragraphs, you work in and explore, figure out the details. You illustrate.
As a writer and an artist, I’ve been trying to refine my work for years to cut out superfluous layers and force myself to focus on the meat of the issue. It takes patience and self-control, but I find I’m much happier with the results.
More is common and expected. Less is rare and surprising.






Will Quick replied | Jan 18, 2011 (1 comment)
I agree… I think we’ve come to believe that more is always better.
We think we should be going for more advertising channels, more data analysis, more content, without thinking about whether it’s actually useful or if we have anything useful to say.
I was sent a great link to another post building on this… I think you may find it interesting!
http://www.campaignlive.co.uk/news/1042534/Dare-Lessons-Fat-Duck/
- Will
Adam Singer replied | Jan 19, 2011 (597 comments)
Well said – and thanks for the link Will.
Danny Brown replied | Jan 18, 2011 (19 comments)
Adam, I love your work as is but this post really resonates, man.
We seem to be falling into the mindset of big is better, and anything else is superfluous to success. Why? Look at the cocktail stick – simple, elegant and used everywhere a drink or bite-size food stuff is served.
We don’t need 2,000 word blog posts when 200 shares the same story. We don’t need a 50-page newspaper when we just want to read the comic pages.
Hey ho…
Adam Singer replied | Jan 19, 2011 (597 comments)
Hah! Yeah, give people just want they want & kill the noise.
Davina K. Brewer replied | Jan 26, 2011 (6 comments)
Heh, Danny. Just had that conversation a while back.. people don’t read the paper, they just want the funny pages and puzzles.
Shari Weiss replied | Jan 19, 2011 (23 comments)
As an English/journalism/marketing professor, I always tell my students:
“Sometimes Less is More, and sometimes More is More.”
When it comes to any one “sentence,” then YES, stripping a sentence to its cleanest, most essential components is necessary for the clearest communication — which SHOULD be the first objective in writing.
However, sometimes — in fact — More will be More; one example would be that More Engagement with community members will reap better results than simply “putting something out there” even if that something is stated concisely.
Adam Singer replied | Jan 19, 2011 (597 comments)
Agreed Shari – in certain cases more *is* better, you’re spot on. The trick is knowing when this is the case.
Rachel LaFlam replied | Jan 25, 2011 (2 comments)
I agree that with less, you have time to truly refine what you do have. Yet at the same time, for a PR professional, shouldn’t they strive to reach as many people as they can? Usually this is accomplished by being involved in as many different social media outlets as you can.
Alexandra Parrish replied | Jan 26, 2011 (1 comment)
PR is the management function which evaluates public attitudes, identifies policies and procedures of an individual/organization with the public interest, and plans, executes and evaluates a program of action to earn public understanding and acceptance.
With that said, the ‘public’ should be recognized, not barraged by social-media channels.
Davina K. Brewer replied | Jan 26, 2011 (6 comments)
Adam, Gotta agree that less is more. It’s of course the right less, the most influential, the critical less. Favorite expression I hear/share lately: fish where they’re biting. Focus on the biggest bang for the buck, most efficient and effective ROI. That’s why I limit my social networks, don’t jump on every new toy. It’s too much. Like you told @Shari the trick is knowing when more is really better or just more. FWIW.