Most Marketing And PR Agency Blogs Are Unreadable
One of the reasons I was compelled to join TopRank Online Marketing more than one year ago was the agency’s A-list blog – Online Marketing Blog (and I’ve enjoyed writing more than 40 posts there since joining the team). Prior to joining TopRank I had regularly been approached by other digital consultancies and turned them down. One reason why? I was unable to understand how they could concurrently offer items like blog consulting services and yet also:
- Have just totally unreadable blogs
- Maintain blogs but barely update them
- Have updated blogs, but traffic was pretty sad
It just felt like they were slapping blog marketing on their existing consulting menu but didn’t know the first thing about the social web themselves.
Not to mention when questioned on their consulting/client successes to see the types of projects and the team I’d be working with, I was unimpressed. But we’ll set that one aside for now.
There is the old story of The Cobbler’s Children in business everyone has heard of – except in digital marketing I don’t buy it. Marketing consultancies (or even marketers) who don’t blog or have results behind their efforts says something about their competence. If they were that capable of doing it themselves (and really understood the benefits) they would be. This is one area that if you can’t get it right personally, there is no way you can help others.
The reason behind this is simple: a good consultant can help point a client in the right direction, but only if they have traveled the path. And so few agencies have done this. In fact, it’s even worse – as I hinted at above, most agencies now do have blogs but they’re basically unreadable.
This bothers me, and if you are client-side it should bother you too. It should bother you because nearly every marketing and PR agency (qualified or otherwise) has added blog/social media consulting to their list of services. And almost none of them have real success metrics from their own efforts.
You need to walk the talk, it’s just not something where the reasons for success are understood by distribution or proxy, even if advice is everywhere. Experience and experimenting trump “best practices” if there even exists such a thing in the social web.
If you’re a modern marketing agency, your practice isn’t defined by your website, it’s defined by the ongoing story you’re telling to the world through the social web. As the most passionate team members become savvier and want to work with consultancies truly at the edge, your blog will make or break your hiring. As clients look to the social savvy of consultancies, their writing will be closely scrutinized and be a factor in gaining or losing new business. If you don’t blog at all you’re telling a similar (perhaps worse) story by not even trying.
Yet with social media not being new, I can’t help but think agencies who fail at blogging are going to fail at the future of marketing and PR. I understand there exists demand for all aspects of marketing, not just digital, but if I were client-side why would I hire any type of agency unable to succeed using modern communications tools? After all, it’s the job of agencies to stay at the edge.









Lesli replied | Aug 10, 2010 (3 comments)
I would agree that this is one instance when “Those Who Can’t Do, Teach” does not apply.
Mitch Joel – Twist Image replied | Aug 10, 2010 (5 comments)
The funny or scary paradox is that I have been in rooms where potential clients have asked when I get the time to get the client work done with all of this Blogging, tweeting and Facebook stuff going on. I like to answer that by saying, “it’s a fair question, if all I did was client work and it’s a fair question if all I did was Blog all day.”
I’m with you on this Adam, I have a hard time believing that a Digital Marketing agency can deliver on a solid Social Media platform when the players in the agency have zero-to-little digital footprint, or when the players have semi-weird personas online that don’t seem to connect and resonate.
The curious question is this: why? why do we think like this?
Go back to the early days of Madison Avenue: did those agencies build their businesses by advertising themselves or did they build their businesses by doing amazing client work?
Cyber Jack replied | Aug 10, 2010 (1 comment)
I think its simple. If you are work in some of these agencies, you have work. And now the boss is coming and saying: you must write something on our blog. Its normal, that you have better thinks to do, so you don`t write, or write nothing special.
Writing something about their competence is very important, but its true, is only a couple agencies who are good at blogging.
Jeremy Meyers replied | Aug 10, 2010 (1 comment)
Hey-
I’m wondering if you wouldn’t mind defining your terms a little. Calling blogs ‘unreadable’ without giving any context for what you mean doesn’t really give anyone any room for improvement.
I agree that a lot of blogs run by companies in general can lack a strong editorial focus, and come off as sales tools rather than honest opinion pieces and writing meant to clarify a POV or put something out there for the community, but I’m really wondering what your criteria is.
I think we (Waggener Edstrom) do a decent job of balance in this regard, but maybe you could follow up either here or over at our digital groups blog http://blogs.waggeneredstrom.com/thinkers-and-doers and let us know what you think.
Thanks!
Adam Singer replied | Aug 10, 2010 (550 comments)
For some context, see slides 27 and slide 37 of this presentation (but the whole presentation, really) http://bit.ly/cz1CCA
btw thanks for the link — I definitely think you guys do a good job blogging.
Josh Braaten replied | Aug 11, 2010 (30 comments)
You tell them, Adam! I couldn’t agree with you more here. When you really site down and think of a holistic marketing strategy, how could you neglect quality, consistent content?
From big strategic concepts like acquisition, engagement and conversion to the individual tactics like SEO and social media, blogging helps with it all. Like you mentioned, a consultant worth their mettle should have a blog, IMHO. With all the benefits, why would you NOT blog unless you just didn’t know your stuff?
Thom Mitchell replied | Aug 11, 2010 (14 comments)
Adam, thanks for highlighting this. I made this exact point last year and it isn’t just limited to marketing and PR firms. IT consultants are also guilty of this same exact sin. And it drives me crazy. What I find interesting is why any client would listen to a firm with such an obvious disconnect between stated expertise and actual actions.
Here’s my post on this issue.
http://www.thommitchell.com/2009/12/28/who-buys-shoes-from-a-barefoot-cobbler/
Trish Fischer replied | Aug 12, 2010 (2 comments)
It’s interesting that in an era where “content is king” so many marketing practitioners simply can’t write. More interesting is the fact that this has always been true. David Ogilvy (1911-1999), one of the original real life advertising industry “mad men,” was quoted back in the 1960s as saying: “Advertising is a business of words, but advertising agencies are infested with men and women who cannot write. They cannot write advertisements, and they cannot write plans. They are helpless as deaf mutes on the stage of the Metropolitan Opera.” If one were to add “can’t write blog posts, tweets or facebook updates,” the words would be perfectly applicable today.
Jeremy Victor replied | Aug 13, 2010 (5 comments)
Adam,
Tend to agree with you. Agencies (just like publishers) are not evolving. Pretty soon they will suffer the Darwinian consequence of not doing that.
An example – I was on a call with an agency owner the other day and he said two things that practically floored. Paraphrasing a bit …
1. We are still struggling to figure out why our direct mail campaigns aren’t producing what they used to. The designs and copy are great.
2. Yeah we only use our blog for our promotional stuff, you know like events, basically re-purposing our press releases.
Rob Petersen replied | Aug 17, 2010 (1 comment)
Adam,
Great points and I share your feeling. I have noticed that agencies, when they write blogs, feel the need to be self-promoters while good bloggers feel the need to be helpful. I wrote a blog on the topic myself a couple of weeks ago; judging by the comments to both of ours, it appears to be a topic of interest. Keep up the great work. Here is the link if you’re interested. Rob http://barnraisersllc.com/?p=1671
Hazel Nieves replied | Aug 19, 2010 (3 comments)
Adam, thank you for making this very important point. I have been in digital marketing BEFORE social media (dated myself huh?) and find many of the agencies or the slew of ‘experts’ now on the scene do not blog nor do they have the depth of experience I believe is needed in order to be in a position to really help position a client for this new marketplace. My hope is these digital marketers who fall in the ‘wanna-be’ category will fall off soon so clients will be able to discern the real ‘McCoy’.