<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warner Bros. Spams Bloggers, Then Lashes Out Against Reactions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/07/29/warner-bros-spams-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/07/29/warner-bros-spams-bloggers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=warner-bros-spams-bloggers</link>
	<description>Adam Singer on digital marketing and online PR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:56:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt OWen</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/07/29/warner-bros-spams-bloggers/#comment-29123</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt OWen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=7595#comment-29123</guid>
		<description>It seems bizarre that an organisation like Warner, who&#039;ve done so well with their multimedia campaigns, still don&#039;t seem to understand simple engagement. I think (or hope) that we&#039;re on the cusp of an organisational shift, but it seems to me it will simply take some marketers longer to understand how things work than others.
On a personal note - can I assume this came from WB&#039;s tv department, rather than their film devision? Personal experience has shown me that those involved in celluloid are generally ahead of the social curve, while their small-screen cousins lag sadly behind - the perils of broadcast media mindsets!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems bizarre that an organisation like Warner, who&#8217;ve done so well with their multimedia campaigns, still don&#8217;t seem to understand simple engagement. I think (or hope) that we&#8217;re on the cusp of an organisational shift, but it seems to me it will simply take some marketers longer to understand how things work than others.<br />
On a personal note &#8211; can I assume this came from WB&#8217;s tv department, rather than their film devision? Personal experience has shown me that those involved in celluloid are generally ahead of the social curve, while their small-screen cousins lag sadly behind &#8211; the perils of broadcast media mindsets!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/07/29/warner-bros-spams-bloggers/#comment-28950</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=7595#comment-28950</guid>
		<description>Totally agree, these large companies haven&#039;t a clue.
They all need to go back to marketing basics and actually engage customers
If they provide a product that people like, people WILL spread the word.
Maybe they should think about creating original content and programmes that people actually want to watch?
Now there&#039;s an original thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree, these large companies haven&#8217;t a clue. </p>
<p>They all need to go back to marketing basics and actually engage customers </p>
<p>If they provide a product that people like, people WILL spread the word. </p>
<p>Maybe they should think about creating original content and programmes that people actually want to watch?</p>
<p>Now there&#8217;s an original thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Helton</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/07/29/warner-bros-spams-bloggers/#comment-28947</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Helton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=7595#comment-28947</guid>
		<description>Hey Adam,
That was a good call because I have also received those kinds of emails. Using flattery to start the message is a great way to get the door opened.  But it also blinds the suspect so entry can be easy.
Watch out!!
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Adam,</p>
<p>That was a good call because I have also received those kinds of emails. Using flattery to start the message is a great way to get the door opened.  But it also blinds the suspect so entry can be easy.</p>
<p>Watch out!!</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Smith</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/07/29/warner-bros-spams-bloggers/#comment-28935</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=7595#comment-28935</guid>
		<description>This is a really interesting insight into the big brand approach to promotion via social media. Clearly they have outsouced this campaign to an agency who have been tasked with recruiting a large number of bloggers without actually doing any reseach on the writers themselves. However, as long as Google value blogs as independent votes of confidence this practise will continue, and is bound to increase in popularity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really interesting insight into the big brand approach to promotion via social media. Clearly they have outsouced this campaign to an agency who have been tasked with recruiting a large number of bloggers without actually doing any reseach on the writers themselves. However, as long as Google value blogs as independent votes of confidence this practise will continue, and is bound to increase in popularity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Buscall</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/07/29/warner-bros-spams-bloggers/#comment-28931</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Buscall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=7595#comment-28931</guid>
		<description>Good call, Adam. I&#039;ve had similar mails from US companies – even though I&#039;m in Sweden. They never personalize, nor demonstrate an understanding of my blog.
Perhaps this kind of backlash – however small - will teach them something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good call, Adam. I&#8217;ve had similar mails from US companies – even though I&#8217;m in Sweden. They never personalize, nor demonstrate an understanding of my blog. </p>
<p>Perhaps this kind of backlash – however small &#8211; will teach them something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

