Chris Brogan Nails A Universal Truth
Across the varieties of content that exist – from music and movies, to blogs and books, there is a constant. Inevitably the banal/common is popular, and the brilliant/offbeat lives in obscurity. Perhaps given life from those close to the industry or years later from wider audiences if the producers of that content are lucky.
What does this mean? If you play to the middle you’re likely to be more popular than doing something which challenges people and pushes them outside their comfort zone. The truth is, most don’t wish to be pushed outside their comfort zone. They want what is familiar and predictable.
A-list marketing blogger Chris Brogan gets criticized for his work frequently. That’s no surprise, most popular bloggers do. But what’s interesting is the universal truth Chris expresses in his recent post, although unintentional:
One repeat criticism of my work is that I’m not telling anyone anything new, that it’s all common sense. That’s actually reasonably true. You don’t spend time with me, read a few lines, and then smack your forehead and say, “I’ve got it!” Most of my ideas are basically reminders for us to do the things we don’t do, but know we should.
And this truth – that people want what’s familiar – it’s exactly why Chris’ content is so popular. He knows it, and has a content strategy behind the ideas he publishes which have enabled his own rise to popularity. None of this is by mistake.
Content or ideas that are daring or takes chances scare most people. They’re not ready to hear it and shut down when exposed to it. I’ve seen it time and time again as someone who has worked with aspiring artists – their work is so raw, creative and original that others aren’t sure how to process it. Only after they have iterated enough times and been exposed to opinions of others who are creating for the middle do they too begin to gravitate to the middle. Their work takes less chances, follows accepted and anticipated norms, and starts to become aurally pleasing to others. Think it’s coincidence that only four chords are needed to write so most pop songs? It’s normalization, and what (most) people want.
Chris is far from banal or common, but it’s obvious when he writes he’s dialing himself down for his audience. He could easily write content that challenges readers and pushes them out of their comfort zone. He could speak to the industry specifically and create ideas that those of us super close to marketing and PR would praise. But why would he do that when his strategy of common sense is devastatingly effective?
At the same time, it’s all in what you want to attract in an audience. Personally I would prefer to have a smaller, yet smarter audience deeply interested in the subject matter. Popularity at the macro level is nice, but you’re likely to have a closer, tighter community at the micro.
With that said, it’s a delicate balance. If you go too deep, you risk falling into obscurity. Go too broad and you’re skip-able. Find the point that works for what your goals are (and doesn’t make you feel like you’ve sold out) and you’ll be both prolific and satisfied.






Shari Weiss replied | May 14, 2010 (23 comments)
Common sense talking about common sense: Reminds me of my favorite quote from Ralph Waldo Emerson, “We are all looking for someone to tell us what to do.”
Preaching to the choir is one thing, but it’s not easy trying to reach people who fear the unknown like one of my recent students:
“I am one of those people who have avoided social media all together. I am afraid of losing my privacy. I do not want to spend hours of my day in front of a computer because I do that at work for almost 40 hours a week. I am also afraid of picking up stalkers, etc. I am 25 and have no myspace, no facebook and I do not tweet. You think I am missing out? Your page kind of made me feel like maybe there is more to all this, especially since you said you felt it was stupid before….”
It is gratifying, though, when we can reach them.
Thanks Adam, as always, for getting me thinking.
Paisano replied | May 15, 2010 (1 comment)
Good analysis of Brogan, for the most part. True, his success relies on helping others with important reminders of what we “SHOULD” be doing and HOW we should be doing it… but I believe a major factor in his formula for success which can’t be bottled is the fact that he walks the talk and he actually cares about people. He takes time to talk and more importantly listen to others unlike most A-listers (The A standing for something not too flattering for some of them).
Chris also has a hilarious edgy side that comes up from time to time when he has to let off steam and he rants against someone or something. It can be a funny diatribe against the idiotic spammers who don’t know simple net etiquette to large conglomerates or brands like Apple who are doing it wrong when it comes to customer service. He will also swallow his pride and admit when he’s wrong…another unusual trait by A-listers. Be honest and transparent and be human. That’s Chris.
He deserves all the success he has earned…
Pai
Radu replied | May 15, 2010 (4 comments)
There’s also Seth Godin’s case who kind of challenges people. But I guess his audience wants to be challenged, therefore he delivers what they want to hear…
john replied | May 15, 2010 (1 comment)
When I read Chris’s Trust Agents I found great value in how he confirmed many things I was experiencing already. One of them was that he gave me words to describe the work of writing my own game professionally. Are there plenty of thinkers out there that could have given me that spotlight on my professional life? Of course. But we all have our champions and authors that help us out on our journey. Chris is a really great communicator. He does what Peter Shankman and Michael Hyatt, (two other writers and bloggers I learn a lot from) do well. They connect with others and in those relationships find remarkable things to re-share. We all are able to find truths. Yeah once in a while we will come up with a unique idea but really I think we benefit others when we can offer truths and nuggets of wisdom that may have either been lost the clutter or burried under mediocrity.
Guhmshoo replied | May 15, 2010 (1 comment)
I have found this universal truth to be true when creating cartoons. My most popular ones are the simplest in concept and message. The time I decide to get clever (which is more satisfying intellectually) is when I start losing people. That said, I think you need to create both kinds of content. It keeps things interesting.
Kristin Currier replied | May 15, 2010 (20 comments)
This reminds me of some TV show I recently saw a snippet of during a commercial break during a Celtics game. That chubby, affable “chef” guy with the bleached blond spiked hair was hosting a game show. I don’t watch much TV, so I can’t tell you who it is or what show it was. What was ON this show that reminds me of this post? Game show contestants chasing eggs around a floor with a pizza box. With crowds cheering wildly. THIS is entertainment?
We’re surrounded by the tyranny of the mediocre. So many people – with so little talent – dominate everything, and they do because their fans want their own mediocrity reaffirmed. Those people creating brilliant work are obscure, indeed, but I get the feeling that they would not want these these types of fans anyway.
The other side of the coin is when an artist tries too hard to make people uncomfortable. Then, we get pretentiousness, and fans of that are no better.