Shocker: According To Facebook Talking Points, Facebook Is The Future Of Search
I like Jesse Stay (and am a reader of his blog) and wasn’t initially going to blog this. But thinking about it further, and as someone who works both on social media and SEO clients/projects, I felt a need to weigh in and not leave this conversation unchecked.
Jesse wrote a post titled “Facebook and the new SEO.” And I feel like it misunderstands both SEO and the motivations of someone searching the web in the first place. Very similar to how Ben Elowitz misunderstands Google and thinks media somehow needs to be “saved” from search by Facebook. Let’s dig into it.
Perhaps the group that should be paying most attention though are those that currently pay attention to SEO for their company, or the brands they represent. With Facebook’s entry into the search space last week, Facebook should now be part of every company’s SEO plan.
The answer to this at the moment is a tentative “maybe.” It is premature to say that Facebook’s search engine will get used in any degree of scale for searches other than those seeking things directly in the network, such as people or other objects within the social graph. While Facebook search is growing (as with more users, it naturally would) user behavior of the web is still Google search as the default. The branding, relevance and sheer quality of Google’s core product is not going to get trampled simply because another popular web product starts hyping their search. Ask Bing/MSN how well that went — and they also have a 9 figure user base they get to tap (Hotmail has 343 million users globally).
Just last week, Mark Zuckerberg was quite clear when he said, announcing Facebook’s new Open Graph Protocol, that Facebook was working to make “people index the web”. No longer are the days of complex algorithms, PhDs focusing on the fastest and most relevant search results through code. What better way to provide relevant content and experience for what people are looking for, and often even when they don’t even know they need it, than through their friends’ activity on Social Networks. Search is now all about relevancy.
This paragraph just irks me. It’s just a vision statement of the Facebook CEO echoed by a Facebook fan. Their PR team must be proud that influencers such as Jesse simply quote talking points that were obviously crafted to position Facebook against Google. Zuckerberg and his team are consistently masterful at manipulating the media. As a PR professional myself, I do have to give them kudos for that.
But to explain why this is wrong: the web’s link graph is already to a good degree people-driven. The most valuable links on the web are not built by robots, they’re built by humans. Also, Google already takes social signals into account when ranking content, so this is not a new innovation to Facebook. Lastly – search is already all about relevancy. A relevancy driven by an algorithm we as humans have helped shape. Google improved and iterated on their algo for years to deliver a ridiculously strong product. It’s not as if Google is blind to everything happening on the web from a social standpoint.
This paragraph is written as if Google search sucks and Facebook is the web’s saving grace from a search standpoint. I’ll let you pause and think about just how eloquently Google has already solved the problem of web search. If you think Facebook is going to define a more relevant algorithm simply through a “like relevancy” you’d have to be drinking some serious Facebook Kool-Aid. Solving web search is not as simple as some of the tech pundits make it out to be.
SEO is something that is now a standard part of any businesses web budget. It’s simple – you build common strategies for formulating your content to appear properly in Google and others’ search results. You try to guess the keywords you want your website to appear high under, and adapt the content of your site to make finding it in search engine results much easier.
(Emphasis on “It’s simple” and “You try to guess the keywords” mine – SEOs: the comments are yours!)
I pointed out in the comments on Jesse’s site just how absurd this statement was. You don’t “try to guess” the keywords you want your website to appear higher under. If you do, that’s not SEO, that’s flying blindly. Also, as someone who works on enterprise level SEO projects, I have to laugh at the “it’s simple” statement. My point with this is that Jesse is writing an article about how Facebook is going to usurp Google and SEOs should take notice, and yet doesn’t quite grasp SEO himself.
Facebook has made it clear that this is a search game. The release of Open Graph Protocol makes this clearer, and you should be paying attention. Through your likes, Facebook now has the potential to provide near exact matches of advertising towards exactly what you’re looking for, without you even knowing you needed it. That, my friends, is the holy grail of advertising.
That’s contextual advertising. And Google is already doing that – as are other web advertising networks. The thing is, contextual advertising isn’t necessarily as valuable as search advertising because of the lack of intent. Just because I “like” something or I’m reading content on a page is not necessarily an indicator I’m actually seeking that product out. Consider how blind we are to most text link ads on most pages that are contextual. Yet search ads are a different story.
Facebook just did something huge last week. It is now in the interest of every single company out there to be getting their brand visible in the Facebook search so this can happen. This is a search game more than it is social. Facebook just made it a whole heck of a lot more valuable for you to be investing in SEO, but this time it’s on Facebook’s terms, not Google’s, and in the end everyone wins.
Even if this statement was true, I don’t see why “everyone wins” because it’s on Facebook’s terms, not Google’s. There is absolutely no logic to that statement unless you are more of a fan of Facebook than Google.
If Facebook isn’t currently a part of your company’s SEO strategy it’s time to start re-thinking what SEO means to you and your company. Like it or not, Facebook is the new SEO.
Rand at SEOmoz for already debunked this statement nicely. But further, unless users even start to associate Facebook with web search, this statement is flawed without further argument. Consumers clearly prefer Google, as say the analytics results of any properly optimized website and search stat numbers. Facebook is definitely a high value referral source and a great outpost for your social strategy, but to say “Facebook is the new SEO” is pure linkbait and nothing more.









Josh Braaten replied | May 13, 2010 (31 comments)
I think you’re correct in your assessment here… for now. A better search engine in Facebook won’t change the users’ intent within the tools. Unless there is something to buy, or a change in intent, in Facebook, it’s going to be about finding friends and other “social graph” objects.
If, however, Gary Vee’s recent comments on the Six Pixels of Separation podcast (by Mitch Joel) are correct, Facebook is pushing hard towards virtual currency. If (or once) this happens, we’ll be looking at a different story altogether.
All these little pieces, the search, the like button, integrating with websites across the web… it’s all build up to Facebook ecommerce.
Jesse Stay replied | May 13, 2010 (1 comment)
Adam, I am by far no SEO expert, and I’m especially not a marketer (I’m a developer), so I appreciate you weighing in here. It’s good to have someone who understands marketing share their expertise on the subject.
Regarding search, again, I’m by far not a marketer, but to me it makes sense that Facebook is a different type of search strategy, and a different type of search. Rather than trying to find “things”, you’re trying to place yourself so that your brand is found easily and appears in the middle of peoples’ conversations. So, for instance, when people are mentioning your brand in status updates, you want your website to appear when they @mention it to their friends. In addition, as people are looking to discuss your brand, your hope is that happens on your site, or enables them to easily bring your website into their conversations. That is the type of search Facebook is solving.
I think it’s wise for any brand to be a part of this strategy. You’re doing no harm by making it easy for Facebook to include you in the conversations of its users. You’re not taking away your website, nor are you directing your users to go discuss on Facebook. In fact, you’re doing just the opposite – you’re encouraging your Facebook users to discuss your brand right on your own website using the identities and friendships they established there. I don’t see any problem with that, in fact, I see nothing but win for brands with that strategy.
Anyway, I sense some negativity towards Facebook on your part – I’m not sure the reasoning for that negativity, but it’s by far not unique so I’ll give you that. My post was definitely not link bait, but rather an idea I had that I thought I would share – I thought it was an interesting thought, and one that I’m using as I develop architecture for the organization I work for that could help others, and I have seen success with. That’s the only reason I publish – you’ll notice the only major advertising on the blog is an ad asking people to donate to the LDS Church’s efforts in Haiti. If that has caused link baiting, I’m proud of that.
The fact is Facebook has 500 million *active* users. They’ve made it easy for brands to get in front of those users, and they’ve made it easy for brands to enable those users to share with their other 200+ friends on the network. I don’t think brands are doing themselves any favors by ignoring that fact. Brands should be using these tools, alongside any other tools they’re using to get in front of the user.
I hope I haven’t offended in trying to share those ideas.
Adam Singer replied | May 13, 2010 (563 comments)
Hey Jesse, thanks for swinging by to comment. You’re right, I do have a bit of negativity to Facebook. They are trying to be all things to all people. And…it’s boring and not very useful to me. To be perfectly honest, I found them more useful when they were a pure university product. Now that the universe is on there, the network is all but useless for me. That aside, I think those who specialize in web products are who will win the future game, not these monolithic products that try and do literally everything. Even Google today is attempting to branch out, but the point is in a long tail app world, specialization makes sense to win the game, especially as things become easier from a dev standpoint. Just my opinion of course.
Thom Mitchell replied | May 14, 2010 (16 comments)
Facebook’s reliance on the power of the network effect will only go so far. The network effect is real and valuable, but reaches diminishing, and even negative, returns at a certain point. Adam’s point that Facebook was more interesting when it was limited to the College world is a good one. I think you accurately nailed it with your assessment that this is a PR statement more aimed at shaping sales discussions than it is about facts or reality. I’m not a SEO expert by any means but even I know that SEO is just a tactic that supports a larger strategy.
While I appreciate and am likely to click on the content suggestions from my friends on Facebook, I don’t look to them as the experts on everything. I prefer using curated content of substance which I find using my search engine of my choice, Bing for example, to go to a curated site – like the NYT or WSJ or NPR. For breadth and depth of knowledge, I’ll choose a professional resource; for randomly generated interesting things I’ll continue to trust my friends as well as the other usual suspects.
Elon Bomani replied | May 16, 2010 (1 comment)
I am glad that Google has some competition. Facebook is keeping Google on their toes. They are still the God of the internet, but Facebook is catching up.
Facebook tops Google For weekly traffic in the US-Erik Qualman
Good PR, Bad PR it is still PR that will convert into more money for Facebook.
ElonBomani
http://www.elonbomani.com