Why You Need Enemies
Recall law 2 of Robert Greene’s 48 laws of power: never put too much trust in friends, learn how to use enemies. The idea of using enemies is something most never even consider, but using enemies as part of your web strategy can be potent.
Many reading this may be uncomfortable with the idea of playing your enemies for desired outcomes. Yet, as strategists we cannot be closed to any possibilities simply because they carry taboos or risks. Just the opposite, we must be comfortable and experienced implementing all of them.
I’m not going to tell you how to use enemies today, we’ll leave that to you to orchestrate. But I am going to tell you why if you have none, you should make some (and then learn to use them):
Enemies can and will link to you
Simply put, if you have an enemy, they are going to be watching you closely to wait for their moment to pounce. On the web, this means links. So if you push their hot buttons and have already consciously created a group of enemies, they’re going to link to you and pick apart the details of what you say. This is a great thing, links are the lifeblood of the web and if you can create enemies of those within your niche that have authority, you’ll benefit greatly by their links to you. Search engines are agnostic why someone is linking to you, so they play right into your SEO strategy.
If you have an enemy you can engage in ongoing debates, you both win
Notice the digital banter between A-list personalities in any niche that happens so frequently. In actuality, from this banter both sides win. The rest of the people within the industry follow suit, the conversions reference both cases (even the side they disagree with) and both parties ride the wave. It is irrelevant who is “right” or “wrong” because in the end they both will break through the clutter. I’d rather have attention – even attention from those who disagree – and figure out what to do with it than be lost in perpetual obscurity.
An enemy turned-friend can be a powerful ally
As Greene notes, a former enemy will be more loyal than a friend, because they have more to prove. After any stretch of time where two people disagree, rapport is still being built between those two individuals. And by channeling that disagreement and ill-will in a new direction, an enemy can flip to an ally quite easily – it’s just part of our nature. With this new-found camaraderie, that enemy is likely to become an extremely powerful ally, now willing to work tirelessly for your cause.
Enemies keep you laser-focused
Having a nemesis is one of the better motivations to stay heads-down on producing the highest quality results. If you have enemies who keep you focused and motivated, consider yourself lucky. They provide balance to an equation which can otherwise go unchecked when you have none. After stretches of time unbalanced, it’s possible to become complacent and suffer stagnation.
Having enemies is a social proofing signal
If you have made it to the point you can have an enemy, you should for the social proofing benefits. It’s a signal to others that you are worth paying attention to. People will be compelled to pay attention to you since someone else worthwhile is paying attention to you (even if it’s negative).
Enemies will help you cause controversy
And controversy, artfully directed, can lead to some seriously powerful outcomes. With being resourceful the strategy of so many these days, controversy is a way to position yourself against others and stand out.
Pull those to you who have opposing viewpoints
Naturally between enemies there will be a division of thought, with people drawn to both sides. By being the known enemy of a certain persona or even viewpoint, you position yourself to capture the attention from the other side.
Despite what you’ve been taught, enemies are a positive. And as stated at the beginning – if you have none, find a way to make some. Also a warning: careful of the way you go about which making enemies. For example, you don’t want to pick the wrong enemy, or create one without any sort of desired outcome (having an enemy without a design on them can be a dangerous game).
I know the social web for many of you is all warm and fuzzy, but the reality is it is a reflection of our physical world where power hierarchies are very much a reality. Learn to play the game, or ignore it at your own risk.









Stuart Foster replied | Apr 12, 2010 (7 comments)
Love this. Have been exploring the usage of such tactics both for myself and for large clients. You’d be amazed at how helpful a little competition and resistance can be to some people.
Trying to figure out how to apply this to larger brands is a challenge…but one that will be amazingly interesting if I can figure it out.
Would love to hear more of your thoughts on this subject Adam…
Ken Kadet replied | Apr 12, 2010 (14 comments)
You, sir, are an idiot.
(damn, I’ve fallen for your fiendish plan, haven’t I?)
:-)
AHA replied | Apr 12, 2010 (5 comments)
Sure, I can buy the notion that having a rival is good for getting you to up your game, and have employed such tactics myself in the past. As long as it’s done for the greater good of personal growth and not just out of vindictiveness.
I think one shouldn’t go out of one’s way to piss people off, but when the inevitable shitstorms do come, it should be somewhat celebrated. If you’re not pissing people off you’re being too wishy-washy and not saying anything meaningful.
As for the Greene book, I am not a fan. It’s a book of tactics confusing itself for a strategy book. The tips are also laid out in a haphazard way. It’s not really possible to assimilate 48 concepts like that without some kind of simplifying structure applied to it. But then again, I am an INTJ nerd who is allergic to poor factorization/categorization of information :)
Kellye Crane replied | Apr 14, 2010 (1 comment)
I’ve been thinking a lot about this post since reading it a couple days ago. Initially, I disagreed with your premise – I think cultivating enemies to attract attention is usually pretty transparent and can be a shortsighted approach. If you’re seeking to win long-term respect, picking a silly fight with an A-lister is not the way to get there.
However, I now realize that opening a discourse with someone who disagrees with you on a real, fundamental level could be very productive (and actually enlightening to those who “watch” the dialogue). For example, my blog is called Solo PR Pro and I’m an advocate for independent PR consultants. If I interacted with someone who believes one should never work with indie PR pros, it could get quite interesting.
On a side note, I also think there are gender differences on this topic. When was the last time you saw a back-and-forth argument on Twitter, for example, between two women? It is rare.
Thanks for this thought provoking post.
Jonathan replied | Apr 15, 2010 (1 comment)
Haha excellent.
I’ve been writing a couple of articles which are sure to provoke a) the subjects of them and b) all their fans – there are a lot of them – but up until now I’ve only known about 1 or 2 aspects of how this controversy can help my writing and my profile / reputation.
Thanks very much Adam.
jacobian replied | Apr 19, 2010 (1 comment)
well it’s a nice article.it’s always good to have enemy anyway. :-)
Erik Posthuma replied | Apr 19, 2010 (3 comments)
Great thoughts!
Amy replied | Apr 23, 2010 (1 comment)
Sure, I can buy the notion that having a rival is good for getting you to up your game, and have employed such tactics myself in the past. As long as it’s done for the greater good of personal growth and not just out of vindictiveness.
I think one shouldn’t go out of one’s way to piss people off, but when the inevitable shitstorms do come, it should be somewhat celebrated. If you’re not pissing people off you’re being too wishy-washy and not saying anything meaningful.
As for the Greene book, I am not a fan. It’s a book of tactics confusing itself for a strategy book. The tips are also laid out in a haphazard way. It’s not really possible to assimilate 48 concepts like that without some kind of simplifying structure applied to it. But then again, I am an INTJ nerd who is allergic to poor factorization/categorization of information :)
Jackbid replied | Apr 26, 2010 (1 comment)
This article made me smile.. Using your “opponents” to gain publicity and links. Thats brilliant of you… :) Google Gods would bless any blog that can manage to attract thousands of eyeballs.
Cori Padgett replied | Apr 27, 2010 (1 comment)
Good post Adam! :) I’m not typically a fan of making waves to make waves, but I can definitely see how using controversy can gain reactions and traffic. And often times you’re going to make an enemy or two whether you want to or not, so why not capitalize on the potential?
Warm regards,
C
Stuart James replied | Apr 28, 2010 (1 comment)
Cool Post.
Keep your freinds close, keep your enemies closer. They link to you, they provide fodder for content, they promote you by hating you….yeh, it’s a strategy and it works.
Mars Dorian replied | Apr 29, 2010 (1 comment)
That’s soooooo awesome Adam,
and I found out that the more passionate and original you create your stuff, the faster you get into the crossfire !
While I don’t have any enemies (yet), I have some people who keep criticizing my stuff and tell how useless I am. But they’re always coming back, again and again.
Enemy is such a strong word, and you use for drama and excitement purposes in your post, but the idea of having people strongly disagree with you is essential. I will keep that in mind and use it for my strategy.
Ass-kicking, simple as that.
Thanx Adam
Nathalie Pham replied | May 6, 2010 (1 comment)
Hello Adam,
since I am new to the entire blogging realm, I have been observing and reading on different blogs to figure out which tone to take for our business blog. And I really enjoyed reading your thoughts.
Even if I may (or may not agree), I have to stop and think versus just check you off. It reminds me a lot on the fine arts discussions: an art work is always good if people hate or love it. Ambivalence is the death of any work-
Great article-thanks!
Elizabeth Gallagher replied | Sep 22, 2010 (1 comment)
I cannot tell you how true the comment about Laser- focus is.
As an online business person (who initially started trading within a virtual world) I had/have one crazy who has been out to “expose” me for over 2 years from writing half truth “opinion/fact” based statements on “friends tabloid websites” to contacting my business associates both by email and phone to the point they muted her and finally when the desired result was not achieved, making up absolute lies the worst being they had sued me!
But in hindsight (and only hindsight as it was a nightmare at the time) I have come to realise this competitor pushed me into a corner were I could either die or come back fighting. I chose option 2 and have become a better artist and business person and as a direct result of that had opportunities offered that would never have been available at the skill level I was at before she started stalking me.
I owe her so much but of course that was never her intention.
Vinterdekk replied | Oct 7, 2010 (1 comment)
You do not have to know much about the rap and hiphop indursty to get proof concerning the power of having enemies.
In rap it is called a Beef, and is considering one of the most effective marketing tactics third after being killed or arrested.
I am sure the same powers can be used in the blog world, allthough not on the same level.