<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apparently, YouTube Automatically Makes Your CEO A Thought Leader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/04/09/youtube-thought-leader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/04/09/youtube-thought-leader/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=youtube-thought-leader</link>
	<description>Adam Singer on digital marketing and online PR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:56:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AHA</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/04/09/youtube-thought-leader/#comment-28249</link>
		<dc:creator>AHA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=6795#comment-28249</guid>
		<description>I am beginning to see the hyping of Twitter (and to some extent Youtube) as a kind of reverse shibboleth: if a person raves about the awesomeness of this glorified/crippled web-based IRC/SMS substitute thingy, they are automatically excluded from really being taken seriously by me.
Nothing wrong with Twitter in and of itself (I use it myself) but I am totally down with your message of the necessity of actually blogging (or, in my case, running a magazine) and spending serious braincycles plus sanguine/perspiratory/lachrymatory fluids to create content of value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am beginning to see the hyping of Twitter (and to some extent Youtube) as a kind of reverse shibboleth: if a person raves about the awesomeness of this glorified/crippled web-based IRC/SMS substitute thingy, they are automatically excluded from really being taken seriously by me.</p>
<p>Nothing wrong with Twitter in and of itself (I use it myself) but I am totally down with your message of the necessity of actually blogging (or, in my case, running a magazine) and spending serious braincycles plus sanguine/perspiratory/lachrymatory fluids to create content of value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Singer</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/04/09/youtube-thought-leader/#comment-28243</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 05:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=6795#comment-28243</guid>
		<description>Hey Karlie - cheers for coming on here and responding.  Of course, we all have our opinions and viewpoints -- and that&#039;s the whole point of discussion and debate.  Glad you&#039;re open to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Karlie &#8211; cheers for coming on here and responding.  Of course, we all have our opinions and viewpoints &#8212; and that&#8217;s the whole point of discussion and debate.  Glad you&#8217;re open to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karlie Justus</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/04/09/youtube-thought-leader/#comment-28240</link>
		<dc:creator>Karlie Justus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=6795#comment-28240</guid>
		<description>Hey Adam,
I wanted to say thanks for your post. I couldn&#039;t find much discussion around the topic, so I was glad to hear someone else&#039;s thoughts on if/why/how CEOs are using YouTube. I&#039;m still looking for examples of proactive communication from CEOs on YouTube, where I could learn directly from these men and women.
You bring up some good points, and I wanted to respond to them.
1. I based the first statement on personal Google and Twitter research. A better statement should have been &quot;more attention&quot; has centered around Twitter than YouTube when it comes to best practices and examples of proactive communication. I mention in the post&#039;s lede that nearly all of the discussions I could find around YouTube and CEOs had to do with reactive crisis communication.
2. You&#039;re right - there&#039;s definitely not a magic formula when it comes to using social media tools, and I didn&#039;t mean to imply that. I would amend that statement to say any B2B company with video content suitable for public consumption - product demos, tradeshow interviews, commercials, etc. - should be on YouTube, as it makes that content searchable and provides one more point of customer contact.
3. I&#039;d also amend that a CEO using YouTube would be a thought leader for other CEOs using or considering using the service - not over all of social media. If a CEO is using YouTube, he or she can share dos and don&#039;ts, pros and cons, best practices etc. with others. Because this group is relatively small, others would probably be able to learn something (even if it&#039;s just that this would not work for them and their organizations). To me, this is one aspect of thought leadership.
Again, thanks for helping me think through this a second time around and pointing out where there needs to be additional conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Adam,</p>
<p>I wanted to say thanks for your post. I couldn&#8217;t find much discussion around the topic, so I was glad to hear someone else&#8217;s thoughts on if/why/how CEOs are using YouTube. I&#8217;m still looking for examples of proactive communication from CEOs on YouTube, where I could learn directly from these men and women.</p>
<p>You bring up some good points, and I wanted to respond to them.</p>
<p>1. I based the first statement on personal Google and Twitter research. A better statement should have been &#8220;more attention&#8221; has centered around Twitter than YouTube when it comes to best practices and examples of proactive communication. I mention in the post&#8217;s lede that nearly all of the discussions I could find around YouTube and CEOs had to do with reactive crisis communication.</p>
<p>2. You&#8217;re right &#8211; there&#8217;s definitely not a magic formula when it comes to using social media tools, and I didn&#8217;t mean to imply that. I would amend that statement to say any B2B company with video content suitable for public consumption &#8211; product demos, tradeshow interviews, commercials, etc. &#8211; should be on YouTube, as it makes that content searchable and provides one more point of customer contact.</p>
<p>3. I&#8217;d also amend that a CEO using YouTube would be a thought leader for other CEOs using or considering using the service &#8211; not over all of social media. If a CEO is using YouTube, he or she can share dos and don&#8217;ts, pros and cons, best practices etc. with others. Because this group is relatively small, others would probably be able to learn something (even if it&#8217;s just that this would not work for them and their organizations). To me, this is one aspect of thought leadership.</p>
<p>Again, thanks for helping me think through this a second time around and pointing out where there needs to be additional conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Akermanis</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/04/09/youtube-thought-leader/#comment-28236</link>
		<dc:creator>David Akermanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=6795#comment-28236</guid>
		<description>The bit about your CEO automatically becoming a thought leader is way too funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bit about your CEO automatically becoming a thought leader is way too funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

