<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analysis, Commentary And Controversy Are Proven Frameworks:  Ignore Them At Your Own Peril</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/02/07/analysis-commentary-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/02/07/analysis-commentary-controversy/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=analysis-commentary-controversy</link>
	<description>Adam Singer on media, marketing and PR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:55:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brogan...</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/02/07/analysis-commentary-controversy/#comment-27931</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brogan...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=6301#comment-27931</guid>
		<description>Just to be clear, I don&#039;t care if people disagree with me. I welcome it. I learn more from you, Adam, than I do from people saying &#039;you&#039;re so right!&#039; all day. 

But what I&#039;m saying is this: are your BUYERS interested in reading your disagreement posts, or do they want to learn what you&#039;re going to do for them. See the difference? 

That was the thrust of the blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be clear, I don&#8217;t care if people disagree with me. I welcome it. I learn more from you, Adam, than I do from people saying &#8216;you&#8217;re so right!&#8217; all day. </p>
<p>But what I&#8217;m saying is this: are your BUYERS interested in reading your disagreement posts, or do they want to learn what you&#8217;re going to do for them. See the difference? </p>
<p>That was the thrust of the blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kadet</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/02/07/analysis-commentary-controversy/#comment-27847</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Kadet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=6301#comment-27847</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I was a bit surprised and put off by Brogan&#039;s point, too.  I think his intention was more &quot;tearing others down is mean and doesn&#039;t look good&quot; than &quot;protect myself from criticism&quot;.  Brogan&#039;s point, to me, seems to express a worldview of a happy social online environment where brands are friendly, listening, open to ideas, giving and infinitely helpful.  Not bad ideas by any stretch, but it takes a lot of care,  leadership and even iconoclasm to sort through all that you hear and turn it into visionary strategies -- or even strategies that simply stand out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I was a bit surprised and put off by Brogan&#8217;s point, too.  I think his intention was more &#8220;tearing others down is mean and doesn&#8217;t look good&#8221; than &#8220;protect myself from criticism&#8221;.  Brogan&#8217;s point, to me, seems to express a worldview of a happy social online environment where brands are friendly, listening, open to ideas, giving and infinitely helpful.  Not bad ideas by any stretch, but it takes a lot of care,  leadership and even iconoclasm to sort through all that you hear and turn it into visionary strategies &#8212; or even strategies that simply stand out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Wood</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/02/07/analysis-commentary-controversy/#comment-27832</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=6301#comment-27832</guid>
		<description>&quot;Be a student, not a follower.&quot; -Jim Rohn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Be a student, not a follower.&#8221; -Jim Rohn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chidozie Ukaigwe</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/02/07/analysis-commentary-controversy/#comment-27831</link>
		<dc:creator>Chidozie Ukaigwe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=6301#comment-27831</guid>
		<description>I agree totally with Adam, this was the discussion I was just having with a few entrepreneurs, We were debating whether it was good to swim against the tide and build your own clout, rather then following or relaying old conversations.

I am certainly of the belief that if you want to build your &#039;dynasty&#039; you must be willing to step out of your comfort zones and, whilst also stepping into others and disrupting them.

Great Post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree totally with Adam, this was the discussion I was just having with a few entrepreneurs, We were debating whether it was good to swim against the tide and build your own clout, rather then following or relaying old conversations.</p>
<p>I am certainly of the belief that if you want to build your &#8216;dynasty&#8217; you must be willing to step out of your comfort zones and, whilst also stepping into others and disrupting them.</p>
<p>Great Post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Singer</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2010/02/07/analysis-commentary-controversy/#comment-27826</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=6301#comment-27826</guid>
		<description>Exactly - blogs and forums were practically built on these concepts.  We&#039;re unafraid to say what we feel, analyze, criticize and comment - and that&#039;s one of the main reasons why the web is such a compelling communications medium.  Businesses fail to see the raw nature of our conversations, which is why so much of their content marketing fails.  There&#039;s just no edge or personality to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly &#8211; blogs and forums were practically built on these concepts.  We&#8217;re unafraid to say what we feel, analyze, criticize and comment &#8211; and that&#8217;s one of the main reasons why the web is such a compelling communications medium.  Businesses fail to see the raw nature of our conversations, which is why so much of their content marketing fails.  There&#8217;s just no edge or personality to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
