Innovation Without Imitation Is A Waste Of Time
Guest Post By Dayne Shuda of Hunting Business Marketing (follow him on Twitter)
“Innovation without imitation is a complete waste of time.” Mike Rowe – Dirty Jobs
In December 2008, Mike Rowe of Dirty Jobs took the stage at TED to talk about his outlook on the state of work in the United States. He discussed his experiences working in over 200 jobs that most people find gross, despicable and downright inhumane. It’s an entertaining and enlightening lecture, but the point I want to focus on is where Mike states that “Innovation without imitation is a complete waste of time.”
This statement made my ears perk up because as someone that has lived their entire life with an entrepreneurial spirit, I’m used to focusing almost entirely on innovation. And isn’t just me: a majority of the books, speeches and blog posts that discuss entrepreneurship focus solely on the innovation part of success.
In the lecture, Mike uses the example of an iPhone – something most Web savvy folks have these days. It took a genius or a group of geniuses to design the wonderfully simple, appealing and useful iPhone that fans would covet and want almost more than their own wallet.
But the innovation of the iPhone, the hard work that went into the design and functionality would be a complete waste without the imitation process and the individuals willing to work, doing the same thing over and over (running the repetitive manufacturing processes) to actually produce the iPhone.
So let’s take a closer look at a lost art in entrepreneurship – imitation…
Imitation (aka repetition)
It’s an obvious, but often overlooked concept: successful businesses are built on a balance of innovation and imitation.
Whether it’s one of the jobs that Mike Rowe participates in on Dirty Jobs or your own job where you innovate and pass on the process for someone to imitate for the next ten years – imitation is the equally important side of business that makes innovation successful (and ultimately, profitable).
Even musicians we admire have to balance the innovation of crafting a song with the imitation of playing it over and over in front of crowds to earn a living. Listeners need to continually play the songs over and over for the song to spread. Even songs themselves are built on structures of repetition.
At some point, every entrepreneur must turn their innovation into imitation in order for profit and success to be achieved. This acknowledgment means that an entrepreneur must repeat a process over and over again or create a workforce that can profitably do so.
Innovation without imitation is a waste of time – and without respect and understanding of those who are willing to imitate, the path to success becomes more difficult.
Imitation and Continuing Innovation
Another intriguing lecture I watched recently is a presentation from Jeffrey Tucker of the Mises Institute. At the end of the talk, Jeffrey tells the group of high school students in attendance to “look for successful behaviors in the market. Emulate them, copy them, and improve them just slightly. That’s how people make money in a market economy.”
Basically what Tucker is stating is it’s not only important for entrepreneurs to innovate and imitate their own processes, but that it’s important to imitate, innovate slightly, and then imitate once again to find success.
The continual process of imitation and innovation and the freedom to do so is what leads to long-term prosperity for individuals and businesses.
Summary
Mike Rowe points out that in the United States today we often ignore the part of work – imitation – that allows genius innovation to become successful.
Building on that observation, Jeffrey Tucker encourages entrepreneurs to not focus on creating something entirely new, but to focus on copying the best innovations in the world today while adding innovations to make it slightly better.
Our lives are full of mini breakthroughs that build on top of each other to create long-term success. It’s a collective effort as innovators and imitators work together, borrowing each others ideas while adding a little more innovation for the benefit of their consumers.
What areas of your life or business that involve imitation do you see possibilities for innovation?









Adam Singer replied | Jan 27, 2010 (550 comments)
Thanks for the guest post Dayne – it reminded me quite a bit of Malcolm Gladwell’s book Outliers. Essentially, hard work and repetition is a core requirement of not just business success or profit, but even personal success. It’s not as “sexy” as the innovation part, but it’s equally valuable even if not as discussed.
Dayne Shuda replied | Jan 27, 2010 (44 comments)
You’re welcome, Adam.
Thank you for the opportunity. The Mike Rowe video was a good reminder for me personally as I generally think about ideas and innovations, but usually need more effort and focus when it comes to planning the process and repetition required for success.
MikeTek replied | Jan 27, 2010 (6 comments)
Interesting post, Dayne, and thanks for linking to that Mike Rowe TED talk – I hadn’t seen it and it’s great.
There’s no doubt we can’t keep the world and all its infrastructure going without the people who perform the repetitive tasks, the plumbers, electricians, etc.
Imitation is where we start, no doubt. It’s how we learn the ropes. And once we know the ropes we can find new ways to do things – new knots to tie and ways to hoist our sails. New routes.
It’s a shame the engineers and innovators who found ways to mass-produce the iPhone with high quality standards, who developed the machines and processes that make it possible to take such an innovative idea to market and meet demand, don’t share so much in the glory.
Dayne Shuda replied | Jan 28, 2010 (44 comments)
I agree, Mike. We need the folks doing the repetitive work every day to make products and services profitable and useful.
I think we all do the repetitive stuff more than we think in our daily lives. I know that even thought I may convince myself that I like coming up with ideas and brainstorms, it’s the repetitive activities I do that really make things work.
Ross replied | Jan 27, 2010 (1 comment)
Solid post Dayne! When you look at some of the most important products of our generation they have all developed from imitation. The most recent product introduced from Apple, the iPad was a combination of the iPhone and MacBook. Not really innovation, more just a whole bunch of imitation combined into one that resulted in an overhyped product.
Dayne Shuda replied | Jan 28, 2010 (44 comments)
Thanks Ross.
The iPad was definitely a form of imitation. Perhaps Apple figured they already hit a big home run and rather than doing it again they simply tried to improve it. We’ll see if it’s successful.
The iPad is basically an iPhone with supposedly an amazing 9.5 inch screen with super clarity?
Kara Sherman replied | Jan 28, 2010 (3 comments)
Great post, Dayne. This correlates with the importance of comparing your band with other bands… your band imitates other bands while adding a dash of innovation to create interest and value. For example, it’s easy to market my band, Team Smile and Nod, to fans of Tender Forever. 9 times out of 10, her fans dig us. For that matter, sometimes I do this with songs. I’ll have an idea and try to write in the style of a musician or band that’s a big influence to me. Some of my best songs were created this way. Now, it will be interesting to delve deeper into this imitation/ innovation balance consciously. Thanks for the ideas.
Dayne Shuda replied | Jan 28, 2010 (44 comments)
Great example, Kara!
Music is definitely something people use styles to build off into their own unique (but inspired) sound.
Julius Campbell replied | Mar 18, 2010 (3 comments)
Great post, Dayne. The concept of Innovation with Imitation reminds me of the Purpose Alignment Model developed by Niel Nickolaisen. You can read about it here:
http://bit.ly/dsmEx1
The model is a decision framework that helps you determine how to categorize your activities. In his model, he identifies “differentiating” activities and he suggests you approach these in an innovative way. He also identifies what he calls “parity” activities where you should standardize and simplify (or imitate).
The article I linked to is called “Breaking the Project Management Triangle” and it is about Information Technology project management.