All Tangible Media Is Going Away – It’s Just A Matter Of Time

Things like print newspapers and compact discs were made obsolete years ago. They are living artifacts. Digital is the master copy – we’re only waiting for the divide to bridge. It isn’t really an argument, you either can foresee the future where all information, content and forms of media are semantic, social, malleable, searchable entities or you can’t. It may take time but there is no stopping this path, it’s one of the clearer long-term trends.
Evolution of mediums will not stop. Consider where we were 10, 20, 100, or 500 years ago. Is anything really static? The rule we have seen to repeat itself is this: a society undergoing technical progression dictates the inevitable rise and fall of mediums. We have not yet seen this proven false.
- Printing presses replaced scribes
- Eventually the web will completely replace the paper part of newspapers as circulation decline picks up speed (the Audit Bureau of Circulations reports that total average daily circulation declined 7.1% in the October-March period from the same six months in 2007-2008.)
- DVDs replaced VHS
- Eventually personal storage will be 100% cloud based, replacing DVDs (have you tried Netflix through the web? Makes the idea of walking into Blockbuster seem like something a caveman would do).
- Land lines replaced the telegraph
- Cell phones/VOIP will replace land lines (a majority of my peers don’t even have them now – in fact, the number of land lines has fallen somewhere between 4% and 6% in every year since 2000)
- Faxes replaced letters
- Email/scanners replaced faxes – (from “The Decline of Fax“: For e-mail, the critical point was when it became easier to use and less expensive than faxing. Think about how many things are already easier to use and less expensive than what we have now but are not yet ubiquitous. Lots of changes are about to happen quickly.)
- Tapes replaced vinyl
- CDs replaced tapes
- MP3s replaced CDs (if you don’t have an mp3 player in your car today, you will in the future: CD sales are falling in double digit %’s every year: 18% in 2007 and 14% in 2008 and 12% in 2009).
- Broadcast radio is vaporware altogether, the programming is nonsense except for NPR and the quality is painful. Have you seen how many great Podcasts there are, 100% free, with no commercials? Radio is obsolete today.
In all cases, digital technology is superior. As much as I love my vinyl collection, I recognize it is a relic in a digital society. At 27 by having a vinyl collection I’m a rarity amongst my peers.
So why is tangible media losing? Many reasons:
Not natively social - it’s easy for me to share digital media with my network. Mp3s are social - I come up with excuses to share them here even though it’s a disconnect and some of you could care less. I do this for one simple reason: it’s easy. The question isn’t why share, it’s why not?
Slow to distribute – The idea of news – or any information – being distributed on printed paper or other forms of tangible media is wasteful when we’re all connected. The fact that it continues to exist shows you how much our society is made up of creatures of habit over logic.
No sources/linking – Information must be connected for it to be trustworthy. And a source that isn’t linked back to a reference could still be fake. Media is easily able to reference if it’s connected, which adds a new layer of accountability previously unavailable. Future civilizations will find our referencing of facts as printed text quaint.
No community – why bother creating any type media in the first place if you’re not going to connect people and form a community surrounding it? I think we can all agree – organizations (and individuals) with audiences win.
Difficult to put a face behind – it’s so much easier to put people behind digital media than tangible. Think of your favorite blogs and the writer’s behind them. Easy, right? Now think of your favorite newspaper or magazine and try to think of your favorite writers there. Exactly.
Not in the cloud – all of your media will one day be available anywhere, anytime. You won’t even need your mp3 player in your car, your car will connect directly to a digital library you own that is cloud-based. We’re already doing that with text-based media – other forms will follow suit. We’ve seen this to be true during the first wave of digital, (everything follows text) and it’s a future trend.
It’s impermanent – ever had a CD or DVD get scratched? They are fragile forms of media not easily recovered. Old magazines/newspapers are trash. Digital media retains value and can live indefinitely.
No instantly-accessible archives – the fact that Magazines or newspapers can’t just link you to archived content within current content shows their age. Analog media treats media as impermanent and unconnected.
Unsearchable – analog media is painful to search and invisible without arduous effort. Digital media is visible forever, instantly – given infinite life by the engines.
I’m probably preaching to the choir, but just once more I’ll say it: tangible media is nostalgic, but obsolete. It’s just a matter of time.
image credit: Digital N via Shutterstock









Len Kendall replied | Jan 13, 2010 (2 comments)
Agree with everything here EXCEPT for books. There is a timeless collectable quality about them that will keep them around. If all else fails and we lose our data, no one will be horribly set back by not having Hollywood films or videogames, but books are always needed to collect our history.
Adam Singer replied | Jan 14, 2010 (563 comments)
Books will live on for a bit longer, but I think a generation that grows up on 100% digital won’t have the adverse reactions we do to reading for extended periods on digital devices. We’ll perfect the technology by that point, too so it will be pleasurable. Amazons Kindle is really gen 1 of these types of devices. Imagine what gen 2, 3 or 10 will look like.
adam replied | Jan 13, 2010 (4 comments)
With the exception of books, music, and art media…you are probably right. Why not books, music, or art? X amount of songs on a playlist with whatever resolution pdf for liner notes does not equal the tangible characteristic of owning a copy of “The White Album”, “The Downward Spiral”, “Speak And Spell”, “20 Jazz Funk Greats”, and so on. Just because people pay for ersatz media does not mean it is the way of the future
Adam Singer replied | Jan 14, 2010 (563 comments)
You’re a collector though Adam. You enjoy the tangibility of it. I do too. But most could care less – collectors items sure, but future generations won’t have the tastes we do. Of course, it’s not possible to predict with certainty. We should talk about this over coffee sometime, would be a good discussion.
Catherine Lockey replied | Jan 13, 2010 (63 comments)
You’re right (as usual). Still, I like to be physically comfortable when reading the news etc – I especially like to recline in a comfy chair or relax outdoors. I’m not sure I want that stark bright light (which modern devices tend to emit) glaring at me the whole time.
Adam Singer replied | Jan 14, 2010 (563 comments)
Imagine kids today who grow up glued to their iPhones and digital devices. Perhaps to them, digital content is their form of relaxing – they are native to it.
dan replied | Jan 13, 2010 (1 comment)
There are also collectible books, comics that will never go away. I don’t see anyone giving up their first edition superman comic or their first edition bible in favor of it’s digital incarnation. What I would see happening with that is a whole new generation of folks would be able to pick apart 70 years of superman and have access to every superman ever printed, same with rare books and otherwise. That part would be good, but no one is going to discount the physcial medium as long as it has a tangible monitary value.
my 2 cents.
Adam Singer replied | Jan 14, 2010 (563 comments)
Yes, we definitely have value in things like comic books as collectors. But will future generations or will they see it as a relic to the past? Will they still be mass-produced, or end up purely in the hands of museums and rich collectors?
F replied | Jan 14, 2010 (1 comment)
Tapes never really replaced vinyl. Video in any form hasn’t replaced going to the cinema. This “replacing” thinking is a total fallacy. We have to think beyond marketing and cliches. Who is it that really wants us to “replace” tangible media/content for digital information? Who benefits? Who loses out? We need to interrogate all this.
Adam Singer replied | Jan 14, 2010 (563 comments)
Absolutely – we need to investigate all possibilities. I hope you’ll respond with commentary on your blog.
Kim replied | Jan 14, 2010 (1 comment)
I don’t necessarily agree with you about ‘impermanence’. Digital data lasts forever; or 5 years; whichever comes first. Or, as the sign on my sys-admin at work’s cubicle says: “Data loss happens”.
With digital music, it’s not such an issue as you can re-download it. However, most people don’t have a backup regime sufficiently vigorous to give their data a fighting chance.
Yeah, I know, soon it’ll ‘all be in the cloud’. My question is, “who’s cloud?”. All of the clouds that exist at the current time are owned by individual corporations. Do you trust them? There’s already been one cloud failure (T-Mobile’s SideKick service).
Adam Singer replied | Jan 14, 2010 (563 comments)
Always keep local backups of your files in the cloud, for sure. I trust Google to hold a lot of my files, but that doesn’t mean I don’t keep my own backups too. Although I happen to think the right cloud storage systems are far more reliable and trustworthy with data than most home users.
Shari Weiss replied | Jan 14, 2010 (23 comments)
Adam, I’ll be reading this post momentarily AND commenting on it in my own article today AND that’s why I learned that neither you NOR your blog are on Wikipedia yet: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&redirs=0&search=the+future+buzz&fulltext=Search&ns0=1
Someone needs to start your pages, and if it isn’t done by the time I get back from vacation, that will be one of my first tasks.
Adam Singer replied | Jan 14, 2010 (563 comments)
Thanks, Shari! :)
Markus Pettersson replied | Jan 14, 2010 (2 comments)
I’m sorry to say, but I don’t agree in any way. There’s no tangible reasons in the post to why tangible media would go away – just reasons why digital/online is good. It’s just like saying that spoons should go just because knives are sharper. You need to understand consumer psychology and the business models of different media to make bold claims like this. Sadly, it’s typical of new media advocates to make invalid arguments like this – but the world is a little more complex…
Adam Singer replied | Jan 14, 2010 (563 comments)
Interesting argument Markus. So you’re saying both can survive side by side? The question becomes this: as a new generation that is native to digital comes of age, will businesses bother with producing forms of media that are less profitable? When was the last time you heard of growth in something like print newspapers? Certainly, a blog post is simplifying the issue – I’ll try and get into this topic again in the future and go into more specific examples for you Markus.
Markus Pettersson replied | Jan 15, 2010 (2 comments)
Well, the thing is that there is nothing that says that paper is less profitable. Online media are doing just as bad as offline right now, which kind of kills that argument. And for radio, it is still the most popular media to listen to: http://www.medialifemagazine.com/artman2/publish/Radio_46/What_2010_holds_for_radio_as_a_medium.asp
Different media feed of eachother, there is really no conflict between the coexistence of traditional and “new” media.
Posted a short blog on the subject at http://vampyrse.blogspot.com
Finally, no harm meant with my tone! It’s just for argument’s sake…
Alex -S- replied | Jan 14, 2010 (1 comment)
Absolutely! Old Media dead, long live the new (ish)! now if only it would actually get a move on and start happening properly ;)
Great article and I agree (except for the books part – nothing will replace the wonderfull tangibility of holding a book for me)
I do always think though with all articles about nnew media, new marketing, new technology that there’s one drawback to all of our content – we’re preaching to the converted generation! the older generations won’t change, we’re already addicted to all this shiny new stuff, but what’s more important is – where will the next gen take it?
Great Blog though! Keep it up!
Steve replied | Jan 14, 2010 (1 comment)
You make an interesting case, but I disagree with many of your points for the reasons a lot of other comments have already stated. I think the biggest problem with this piece is that you say *all* forms of tangible media will be replaced and there seems to be many people here checking off exceptions. People have been writing obituaries for newspapers and radio for decades and many media companies still make more money selling ads in their “tangible, impermanent” media than they do online. And speaking of “impermanence,” what’s more permanent than something physical? As someone here already said, data loss happens. I’d also like to add power outages and loss of connectivity happens. Good luck calling up your “permanent, instantly accessible archives that live in the cloud” when the zombie hoards are banging at your door, the power is out and you can’t use Google. I’ll just turn to my trusty “Zombie Survival Guide.” :-)
David Mostardi replied | Jan 14, 2010 (1 comment)
The problem with digital cloud media is that it assumes a benign beneficence on the part of the Provider: easy and inexpensive access to everything I want, whenever I want it. I am not ready to assign that much beneficence to the Provider yet. If I own the tangible media, I control the tangible media.
adam replied | Jan 15, 2010 (4 comments)
For the record, pompously ignorantly detached bloggers (not you Adam) have already postulated the end of physical media.
The article…and my response..
http://www.micropersuasion.com/2008/11/the-coming-end.html
John McLachlan replied | Jan 15, 2010 (1 comment)
What a great post. I agree 100% with you. I’m almost twice your age so I grew up and became an adult with cassette players, VHS, you name it (heck, when I opened my first bank account as a kid in 1967, they hand wrote in my bank book). I have been happy to see all these go and be replaced by, in general, much better forms of delivery.
I think ANYTHING that can be me made digital will be made digital and be replaced. Yes, I love the feel of a book when I read it, but I can’t wait to replace these dinosaurs with electronic versions. A bookstore now is where the CD stores were just a few years ago. I don’t give them much time for the world. Same for newspapers and print magazines. It’s over!
I think we get too hung up on the vehicle that delivers the message (paper in a book versus a screen – just two different display technologies). What matters is what’s getting delivered.
Carl Phelps replied | Jan 15, 2010 (2 comments)
Wow, this just sums up various thoughts I’ve been having for about a year or so. There are tremendous business opportunities here for smart people who understand these trends, and are passionate about it. There is a need for forward-thinkers on both the hardware and services side.
Simon replied | Jan 16, 2010 (1 comment)
Aside from the tactile benefits listed above, a big reason why tangible media will stick around is gifting. While it may be more efficient, buying someone a digital download isn’t the same as wrapping it up in paper and physically giving it to someone
And few things become fully obsolete. I can still go out at buy some new tracks on vinyl, for instance.
Kara Sherman replied | Jan 26, 2010 (3 comments)
I think it’s important to reiterate that we’re talking about the future here… of course there will be a huge transition period. And, of course, the technology is not currently here. But it will be. The first thing I thought was, “A cook book could not be replaced.” And right now, it couldn’t be. But it can be in the future. And it will be. If we limit our imaginations, we’ll get left behind. Awesome thought provoking post! Thanks, Adam! (BTW, I love the wording “analog media”. Makes me think of the ol’ analog/ digital recording debate. What’s winning?)
Stephen Ritger replied | Feb 18, 2010 (1 comment)
Yup…soon, all current disk-based (CD, DVD, Blu-Ray) media will have gone the way of VHS. Music and movies will be purchased or rented on solid-state memory cards or simply streamed from the Internet…oh, wait…we’re already doing that now…