Social Media Is Not New
Face facts: social media isn’t new anymore. Actually, it hasn’t been new for a long time.
We’ve been socializing on the web for well over a decade – long before Twitter, Facebook and the glorification of monolithic walled gardens, which are nothing more than modern versions of AOL and prodigy with bells and whistles.
If you think the social web is new, you’re already far late to the party. And if you are late, the worst thing you can do for your brand or yourself is to flat out ignore or brush off a form of communication that an entire generation already sees as “invisible.”
As technology becomes ubiquitous it also becomes invisible… The more networking succeeds, the less we’ll be aware of it.
This has already occurred. The social web is invisible to my generation. It’s invisible because we aren’t talking about how groundbreaking it is or how it is somehow disruptive, to us it always existed. It’s as normal as the telephone is to the previous generation. We simply don’t know a world without it. We use it, but we don’t really talk about it (except us metablogging geeks, but we don’t count – I am talking about regular people).
The web is not fascinating to an entire generation because we grew up in a world where it was native. In fact, it’s uncomfortable for us to read how the older generation thinks this is new because it just shows that they were oblivious to shifts in communication happening around them. For me, growing up and witnessing most of mainstream society ignore the web is actually somewhat depressing, as it is evidence that people are afraid of change and embracing what is new/different until they have no choice.
If you are a brand or a marketer and don’t “get it” by now, the worst thing you can do for your reputation is publicly state that you’re new or consider social media new. There really isn’t an excuse for having ignored trends this long and it just shows you aren’t paying attention. If you want to forever reinforce the way things are done today, being a communications professional is not for you. Tomorrow is always different.
Going along with that, at this point I don’t think brands need social media experts, they need good marketers. By now, marketers worth their salt understand all media, and if they are really good, they also have their finger on the pulse of where this is all headed.
The best thing you can do if you find yourself on the wrong side of the business digital divide right now is quietly learn or get consulting to become educated on how to modernize your marketing and brand. It’s nearly 2010 – you’re going to look passé to all stakeholders if you don’t approach in a strategic and smart fashion.
Fluency in the web is not something to be put in a silo separated from the rest of your business like many have been doing. It is a standard requirement that your entire team comprehends it – at least if you want to not just survive, but thrive in a connected society.
What I’m hoping to see in 2010:
- A move away from people talking about social media as if it is new. Even if it is new to you, it is already not new to far too many people for you to claim it as such and not position yourself poorly.
- People presenting at conferences at a higher level. Your audience understands the basics by now, it is okay to step it up – no one needs internet marketing 101 presentation anymore, and if they do they aren’t attending conferences for that. Treat your audience as smart enough to Google the answer or ask questions at the close of your presentation if they don’t know something. You should be presenting revelations, not things everyone already knows.
- Less of traditional media writing sensationalist articles about social networking ruining the lives of teens. All that these do are frighten parents. For kids to have a shot in tomorrow’s economy, they need to be connected and on par with their peers in using technology. Also stop blaming technology for the ills of new generations, blame bad parenting. Technology is neutral, it is not inherently good or bad, application is what defines it as such.
- Less blogging about Twitter. Seriously, we get it. Raise your hand if you honestly want to see more blog posts about Twitter. 99/100 posts about that network aren’t necessary.
- More marketing discussions about strategy, theory and web-based interactions through the lens of sociology. There is so much to be explored here and it’s far more interesting than posts from big name bloggers merely ripping each other off.
- More blog posts about future trends – pontificate about what’s coming next and why, these stories are great.
- Less posts across the board, but higher quality conversations.
- Less on specific tools, more on trends of web usage and content.
- More sharing of content in the long tail as opposed to the obvious sites. If you want an example of someone doing this well, follow Louis Gray and check out the links he shares. He’s an A-lister, yet an overwhelming majority of content he shares is from sites in the long tail – and when he shares something the content is as good as any ultra-popular site (popularity does not dictate quality). I have probably discovered more interesting content from Louis than any other single source in the last year.
Do you agree social media isn’t new? What do you want to see going forward?






Adam Pieniazek replied | Sep 10, 2009 (3 comments)
Agreed. I often tell people social media is not new, even wrote a post little while back with same title showing that social media has been around for a long time.
If we go beyond digital means, there was even a newspaper published in 1690 with a comments section! Sure, you had to write your comment than physically hand it to a friend to read, but it’s still a very basic form of social media.
Also, I’m hoping that in 2010 we see “Less of traditional media writing sensationalist articles”. Period. Leave the sensationalism to others, newspapers should give us the news, plain and simple.
Tamara Gruber replied | Sep 10, 2009 (2 comments)
Well said. I’ve been turned off from some conferences recently because I went to learn and I came away thinking I could have presented. There needs to be a clear differentiation between newbie school and, as you said, revelations.
I’m also tired of social media, or any medium, being discussed in a vacuum. Let’s redefine the 4 Ps of marketing and approach best practices across the board incorporating all mediums. Coming from a mobile background, I see that industry as well acting as a silo, when truly successful programs take into consideration the whole brand experience and how it relates to a consumer’s life.
John Sinclair replied | Oct 19, 2009 (1 comment)
Social media hardly new when some of us were using BBS and an “Archie” search for legal reform materials as “Distant Education” and “Telemedicine” Health Cost Reduction Research”? Nor are we fooled that “Neuromarketing anything more than some slick USP or repackaging/positioning/branding/segmenting of “Skinner, Jung and Chomsky for Dummies!” Get it?
John Sinclair
Message and Media Analytics
Rosanne Gain replied | Sep 10, 2009 (1 comment)
Thanks for this great post. As part of the boomer generation, I am amazed at the number of my contemporaries in PR and advertising who have yet to even put their toe in the water of social media. I’m only a few years in and am by no means an expert, but I am learning as much as I can as fast as I can. I enjoy your emails and learn so much from them. Thanks
Shari Weiss replied | Sep 10, 2009 (23 comments)
Rosanne, One BabyBoomer to another: I agree 100% with your comment. Re: Adam Singer – My Favorite Blogger and the site I recommended most often to my PR/Marketing students at San Francisco State.
Re: Louis Gray – AWESOME influencer and a genuinely bright and nice guy as well as a very happy daddy.
Adam, keep on blogging, i.e. more posts not less — despite your advice above.
I’m one of the meta-bloggers albeit pretty new to the game. I will be branching out once I further develop my chops.
Louis Gray replied | Sep 10, 2009 (7 comments)
Adam Singer is one of the best PR people and bloggers out there. I think he has fantastic content and thinking. And he’s real! I’ve actually met him. :)
Adam Singer replied | Sep 10, 2009 (597 comments)
Well thanks Shari and Louis!
Vanessa Warwick replied | Sep 10, 2009 (1 comment)
Social media is not new! Social media has been around since the first caveman painted a picture on the cave wall of how to bring down an antelope. Social media is the collecting and sharing of information. That has been done via clay tablets, papyrus, books, radio, TV, and now the web.
Humans have always shared and communicated information that they have found helpful or interesting. The web just gives us another platform to do this, and allows us to reach out to a global community.
The great thing is that it is mostly free and there are 0 barriers to entry. A homeless man on the streets of a city using a copmuter in a cybercafe can reach the same amount of people as a major corporation. The web has levelled the playing field and will be the death of hierachical corporations.
Cory Casciato replied | Sep 10, 2009 (1 comment)
Right … and wrong. It’s all relative. Yes, social media is not really new. I totally agree that Facebook et al is really just a fancy-pants version of what I was doing on dial-up BBS systems in 1992 – and they weren’t new then, just new to me! On the other hand, it’s also hard to argue that those had much of an impact then beyond the lives of a few hardcore nerds like me and my friends — it wasn’t until ten years later that it became mainstream. And compared to traditional media, it is still new — at least until something newer comes along. So expect it to be still be called new media for a while — it is handy shorthand and people know what you’re talking about, even if they feel a need to interject and point out “hey, it isn’t really new,” which is really a way of saying, “hey, it isn’t really new to me.”
When the current generation grows up and takes over it won’t be called new anymore, although it may still be called new media, unless something truly new ha arrived to take its place in the newniverse — more a quirk of language than anything else. That being said, I agree 100 percent that the traditional media needs to STFU with the “Hey, look at this wacky thing!” stories about social media/new media. Admittedly, I’ve written one or two of those myself, but as a freelance writer, I get paid to write what the people hiring me want written — my nerd arguments just draw blank stares. And the trad-media really need to stop the scare stories, not just about teens but about “How someone can use Facebook or Twitter to eat your soul — story at 11″ type garbage too. But that will never happen, since they thrive on controversy and fear-mongering (as do new media types — see I just did it, makes sense in context, doesn’t it?) so the best bet is simply to be ready to debunk those. Think of it as a way to get free hits when someone Googles “Hey, will Facebook REALLY eat my soul?” and don’t get too worked up over the world working the way it has always worked.
Jon Severson replied | Sep 10, 2009 (1 comment)
Agreed 100%.
This is what I think is so funny…so many Social Media “Experts” can’t tell you what happens after you hit 1000 fans on Facebook much less realize that for years the Internet and Social interaction has gone hand in hand. MSN Groups was something I started using 11 years ago (now defunct) to get the word out about me as well as interact with others.
I’ll also argue that the forefront was possibly the old Majordomo based email “lists”. I’m still in touch with a few people from the old cycling list I was on in ’93-’97 (Met one for the first time in Salida a year ago at a bike shop, 2 others are my Facebook “friends”). I ran the Midwest MTB Majordomo based list in ’96-98.
On goes the list of things that would qualify as basic Social Media. Reality is the validity of the phrase Social Media is about as weak in as Web 2.0 (which also was created by someone to hype their own personal needs more than really actually define specifically what it is).
Speaking of which the term “Social Media Expert” and the creation of the field in the last 6 months by these “experts (read college kids who can’t get jobs, hacks who’ve lost their jobs, and people with 50,000 friends on Facebook but none in the real world) has to be the biggest mass scam since snake oil salesmen at the turn of the century over a 100 years ago. If J.R. Watkins was alive now, he’d be a Social Media expert.
In short, kuddos galore on this article about time someone said it. Please feel free to hunt me down on Linkedin: (Linkedin.com/in/jontoseverson) or Twitter (@jontoseverson). You’ll see this is spot on with my feelings. Thanks for giving me some ammo. :)
Lisa Sullivan replied | Sep 10, 2009 (1 comment)
Totally AGREE! I think probably my favorite point you bring up is this – For kids to have a shot in tomorrow’s economy, they need to be connected and on par with their peers in using technology. Also stop blaming technology for the ills of new generations, blame bad parenting. Technology is neutral, it is not inherently good or bad, application is what defines it as such.
As a former educator & advocate of all things children, I am so happy to see someone else mention that it’s not about the technology (or the video-gaming or the….), it’s about the PARENTING! It’s amazing how often everything else BUT the parents are blamed for the faults of their kids. I could get on a soapbox here but I won’t.
I also agree that it’s not about the hiring of a “social media expert” per se as it is about hiring a GOOD marketer, one that understands all facets of marketing – traditional & social media-based. Thank you for validating that as well!
GREAT read!!
nick tadd replied | Sep 10, 2009 (1 comment)
I would argue that social media goes back to the time of cavemen.
Instead of twitter they had red ocre, a finger and a cave wall, which they shared information – maybe about how to “bring down mammoths?”
Therefore, I would take the view that “we don’t need social media experts” or “internet marketers” we need people to communicate – in this instance via the web and it’s various tools.
Just a thought.
N
Stuart Foster replied | Sep 10, 2009 (7 comments)
I think that’s why it will continue to be successful though. The very fact that it isn’t new will allow for faster adoption, lasting success and a great deal more traction.
Andy replied | Sep 10, 2009 (1 comment)
As a marketer, one should know her or his audience. If you have proven, consistent reason to ascertain that *online* social media is a novel concept to your audience, then why not tout the fact that your brand has joined the conversation on some given web-based SM platform? Put it this way. Yes, if you’re selling energy drinks, forget about it — join Twitter quietly and hope nobody notices you waited so long. If you’re reaching out to senior housing renters, you can probably toot your horn a bit. As someone has already mentioned, the notion of communicating via social channels is ancient. *Widespread* adoption of *online* social media channels is a relatively recent and fundamental shift in the way that masses communicate.
Mary replied | Sep 11, 2009 (1 comment)
I say social media will stay for some time. Its not going to go away very quickly. It is because of social media brands are able to reach out to their target audience.
Social media is the most potent tool to influence people on the web nowadays. Platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Flickr, etc. allow you to get directly in touch with potential customers. There is no limit to the number of ways you can promote your site or business through some of the social media channels mentioned above. Only social media has the reach that can get online attention and huge traffic to your site at virtually no extra cost.
http://blogs.position2.com/why-social-media-marketing-is-essential
Regina replied | Sep 11, 2009 (1 comment)
Those words could come from my mouth.
I couldn´t have said it better myself!
Catherine Lockey replied | Sep 12, 2009 (63 comments)
No, it’s not new but today it’s the buzz. That’s good for me because ’round these parts there are still a lot of social media beginners!
Jessie D replied | Nov 1, 2009 (1 comment)
I agree completely. Social media is something my generation has grown up with and can use with ease. I am currently in my last year of a three-year public relations diploma program. Every time a professor starts a class with “Lets talk about social media!” my classmates and I either groan loudly or settle in for a nice afternoon nap. Even worse, the poor first-year students are being forced to take a social media class.
In my first and second semester, my classmates and I were required to take an electronic publishing class. In this class, we learned all Microsoft Office programs, Photoshop, QuarkXpress, and Adobe Illustrator. While I found the class boring at the time, I am extremely grateful that it was part of my curriculum. I am currently in the process of applying for internship positions. Each position requires proficient use of Microsoft Office programs as a prerequisite to applying for the job.
Two years later and this electronic publishing class has been replaced with a social media class. A friend of mine in this class told me that they had an entire class dedicated to learning how to open a Twitter account and how to tweet. I opened a Twitter account and learned how to use it in all of five minutes. Instead of learning skills that will help these students succeed in the workplace, they are learning how to do things they already naturally know how to do. Teaching a 19-year-old how to use Facebook is like telling a fish how to swim.
As you said, it IS important for the current and next generation of public relations practitioners to learn how to use social media effectively and strategically. Just as we are taught to strategically use integrative marketing, press releases, media drops, and creative campaigns, learning how to use social media appropriately is incredibly important for succeeding in a career in public relations. I just can’t help but laugh at the thought of the program coordinator at my school who is probably thinking, “We have a social media class! Look how innovative we are!” Sure, it’s innovative for her, but is it innovative for us? Not even slightly.
It was a pleasure reading this blog post. I can’t wait to share this with my classmates and professors!