Why Video Blogging Hasn’t Taken Off

By all accounts, video blogging should have taken off big-time by now. Consider:
- Digital video cameras are dirt cheap
- Video hosting is free and high quality
- The platforms are simple to use
- High speed internet access is common
It seems like all the elements are in place.
But while there is no denying several people have made it big in this space, video blogging has not achieved anywhere near the scale and recognition of text-based blogging and communications. Try and think of 10 popular video bloggers. You may be able to do it – but it probably wasn’t instant. Now think of 10 popular text-based bloggers. Exactly.
Let’s consider what is holding video blogging back:
It’s time-consuming to produce compelling video
I’m not saying it doesn’t take time to produce interesting copy, certainly it does. However, producing watchable video is an entirely different skill-set that requires you not only to prepare content beforehand, but there are production elements required even after filming. Also until you become proficient with video-production software, editing isn’t a quick task. Getting to the end result is a multi-step process and could potentially involve multiple takes. Producing text – while also requiring talent – is just much more efficient.
Professionals still have a huge leg up
In text-based communications, professional writers don’t have a leg up against amateurs anymore. In fact, amateurs are in many cases more compelling than the professionals of yesterday because they are not bound by rules that constrain and constrict the emotion possible through words. What we have seen regarding text is we’re not so much interested in refined, polished content – what we want is emotion and passion, polished or raw.
That’s because text is all about content, it’s that simple. Got opinions? If you’re sharp enough, you could disrupt your local newspaper’s editorial section with just your brain and an internet connection. The only advantage they used to have is distribution, but now anyone with sustained effort can acquire that.
Newspapers also enjoyed a monopoly for a long time, while TV and video producers lost their monopoly ages ago. Consider how many different choices you have had through cable TV for years, yet for your choice of daily newspaper there were only one or two options in most places until the internet became ubiquitous. Video producers have been forced to advance their skill sets and be ultra-compelling. It’s hard to compete against professional personalities who have honed their skills in a competitive environment and have sharp writing and production staffs behind them.
We grew up with a text/image-based web
Thus we’re most comfortable producing text and image-based content. For this reason, we have evolved the web to give precedence to text and image communications before video. Perhaps the next generation will reshape the web with a stronger focus on video, however as it stands today we are still reinforcing the value of text as king.
Tough to quote from videos
If a blogger writes something interesting, it’s simple for me to get a quote from it. I’m not going to transpose what someone says on a video – and while it is possible to embed video, figure out the exact time segment and cue it up, most probably won’t. It’s just not as simple a process as hitting ‘control c’ then ‘control v’ – and on the web simplicity wins. Plus email subscribers might not even click through to watch the video.
We’re just not used to being on video
Most of us simply aren’t used to being on video. It’s not something that we’re trained for, and it’s something which has a learning curve before you start to get comfortable or become watchable. Writing words is natural for us, whereas video can be intimidating.
Text translates
If you develop a popular blog in one language, it’s relatively easy to translate content as a slew of free tools such as Google translate make this simple. Even if the tools aren’t perfect, they are close enough to at least make it readable for people who speak different languages. Video content doesn’t translate.
Video isn’t searchable
Yes, I’m aware YouTube is the second largest search engine. But besides the title and description, the content itself isn’t searchable unless transposed. A nice chunk of search traffic discovers blogs via content and phrases within articles themselves. The very nature of blog content incrementally adds more potential entry points from the addition of unique content. Unless you are transposing content, this is not true for video.
Videos take time to watch
We’ve been conditioned to scan web content, and videos just aren’t scanable. We can scan a page and get the value from it relatively quick, wherein watching a video is a larger commitment.
With all of that said…
Video blogging hasn’t taken off at the level of scale as text has for both individuals and businesses, however that’s exactly why it is a huge opportunity for you to be a pioneer in the space. If you’ve got the skills to be on camera (or are willing to develop them) and are able to put in the effort you could be a breakthrough hit. Especially in niches with a dearth of those producing video.
As it stands right now, if you already have a text/image based blog, adding video into the mix is a way to get the best of both worlds and potentially help you stand out.
image credit: Leigh Prather via Shutterstock






Marci Reynolds replied | Sep 8, 2009 (1 comment)
Very interesting blog.. Just yesterday I was working with a lawyer who is creating some video blog posts to help market his business. It took an entire day of filming then will take 8-16 additional hours to edit- for four, 3 minute blogs. Then- add the posting and promotion time.. Wow. It adds up. But- I do think it’s worth it for those who invest the time.
Shari Weiss replied | Sep 8, 2009 (23 comments)
Adam, as always I love reading your insights. This post hit me where it “hurts” — I have 190+ amateur videos on YouTube and have incorporated a few into my blog. Most recently I reported on a panel discussion on “Do Marketing & PR Suck?’ with Louis Gray, Guy Kawasaki, Renee Blodgett, Loic Le Meur and Steve Patrizi. Incorporating the videos into the post took LOTS of time. I suspect the end result was worth it. What do you think? http://sharisax.com/2009/08/31/is-social-media-the-answer-when-traditional-marketing-sucks/
Tamara Gruber replied | Sep 8, 2009 (2 comments)
Hi Adam,
I agree that video blogging has great potential and has the ability to be much easier than writing. However, as a marketer I still find it more challenging to produce because it needs to happen in real-time (vs blogs that are reviewed and revised over a period of time), the team needs to be in the same location, and the content needs to be produced/edited in some fashion.
As an avid blog reader, I will also admit that I rarely watch video blog posts. Many times, I am scanning my Google reader on my iPhone during down time. At other times, I’m in the office and don’t feel comfortable starting a video without knowing the content. Finally, I’m a multi-tasker. As I’m reading my morning blogs, I’m also listening to a podcast and I don’t want to stop one to focus on the other.
There are clearly adoption challenges on both sides.
DotCOMReport replied | Sep 8, 2009 (2 comments)
I think it is easier to put yourself out there in writing. Some people could never say what they do in words on video.
Christopher Ming Ryan replied | Sep 8, 2009 (18 comments)
Nice work bringing this issue up on The Future Buzz.
While video blogging hasn’t taken off, I do think creative people who want to use video are finding ways to create conversations and community on Vimeo. Blogging is one of the fastest and easiest ways to build an online presence. But it’s not the only way. Film makers and artists are finding that by joining vimeo they are reaching like minded individuals to use as a sounding board to their work. Also, vimeo is becoming a great showcase for people in the industry to find untapped talent.
Their work is hard to find on google but within the community because of staff picks and seeing what other people are watching you can quickly find some amazing work.
Video Blogging is a different beast. I think the best video bloggers have these characteristics:
1) They are compelling to watch.
2) They can think off the top of their heads and sound pretty intelligent.
3) They relate to the camera lens as if it was a person.
4) They have something to say.
Being compelling is probably the toughest part. You’re either born with it or not. Agree?
Hope you had a great summer!
Chris
amymengel replied | Sep 8, 2009 (1 comment)
You bring up a pretty comprehensive list of some of the challenges to the growth of video blogging. I think another major issue is that online/streaming video is often blocked and doesn’t make it past a lot of corporate firewalls or internet monitoring systems. It’s gotten better, but for many people their online time happens at work. I may see a link to a cool video at work, but I have to e-mail it to myself or write the link down and take it with me and watch it at home if I really want to see it – and I rarely do that.
Case Ernsting replied | Sep 8, 2009 (3 comments)
Hi Adam,
I just found your blog and love it already. As I read the article I was hoping you would identify the opportunity that now presents itself with the saturation of text blogs and deficiency in v-logs…and there it was. A great call to action. I just graduated from a Media program at the University of Michigan and we were more than introduced to the art of video blogging. The vlogs are coming, I promise
Hooman Hamzehloui replied | Sep 8, 2009 (1 comment)
I really love the way you mentioned that this is a huge opportunity for someone to be a pioneer. The greatest risk is the one you don’t take. Adding vlogs to your blog allows you to stretch your abilities and learn something beyond your current capabilities. I started adding vlogs to my blog and it is so challenging to deliver a compelling video for the reasons you mentioned. It is also that challenge that inspires me to excel at it so each vlog gets better by the episode. I really enjoyed your piece, its my first time to your blog. Thank you.
Jason Geddes replied | Sep 8, 2009 (1 comment)
great idea however until the costs of internet in Australia drop according to world pricing i can’t see it been as successul as it could be here.
lfish replied | Sep 8, 2009 (3 comments)
The site is looking great Adam – has come a long way from the first few designs… still remember when you started setting it up!
Partha Bhattacharya replied | Sep 9, 2009 (3 comments)
Adam,
A nice post indeed, but alas you’re caught in the old mindset of ‘camera-only’ video. You’re right to point out the factors that hold back video blogging, but all the while you’ve camera-video in mind. The point is many instructional/educational/demonstrative videos are better off without camera video. Here is where the opportunity actually lies. People look for information, and if you can make videos that combine – depending on situation – PowerPoint, flash, screencast, static image in motion, and of course videocam movie, you’ll be exploiting a potential goldmine.
jared evans replied | Sep 9, 2009 (1 comment)
Check out deafvideo.tv. Conversations/comments entirely done in video has really taken off among the deaf.
BarnacleBob replied | Sep 9, 2009 (2 comments)
Adam, if you ever use the term “skill-set” again, I do fear you will be cursed with 7 years bad luck.
Jimboot replied | Sep 10, 2009 (1 comment)
Pioneer?! Geez I’ve been doing it for 10 years when does it become mainstream? :-) Seriously though all your points are valid. I started using video because I could talk faster than I could type. I think video has far more potential to create an impact than text. We are in the process of transcribing years of video tho. For SEO value as well as helping people find specifically what they want in the content. Zeroing in on the specific piece of info they want is easier with text but vid content contains so much more info from the presenters visual delivery. You need to address both IMHO.
However a radio vet of 30 exp once explained to me – if you’re just text, you’re labelled as print, if your audio only you’re labelled as radio & if you’re vid you’re TV. Video is great for personal branding and business networking as well.
Here is a post I made on live vid a little while ago. http://stewartmedia.biz/myblog/Live-Video/
John Santangelo replied | Sep 10, 2009 (1 comment)
I can’t skim through a video like I did this post :)
Peter replied | Sep 11, 2009 (2 comments)
Love the post…I am trying to accomplish many of these in my video blog. Be concise, create engagement and have a blog as a transcript with it.
http://www.businessandthegeek.com/?p=112
Miguel Wickert replied | Sep 14, 2009 (1 comment)
you’re right, I’ve thought about slowing incorporating video on my site but there’s a learning curve, I’m not quite there yet. Then again, it doesn’t mean I should start with bits here and there. It can be time consuming like you mentioned, especially if the individual is difficult to satisfy. We can all be pretty picky. Text is king, I just love it but appreciate video because they’re helpful for many. Example, a video tutorial on rooting my android phone was great. Yes, text is useful but there’s something about a video that was more reassuring. Anyhow, neat write up. Thanks for sharing.
Julian Perrera replied | Sep 15, 2009 (1 comment)
The subject matters that thrive on video aren’t what necessarily is best in text. Video really thrives on anecdote and emotion and text is best in describing complex things succinctly.
And lots of writers just aren’t made to be on-camera. Reading a teleprompter is a skill, improvising is a skill (similar to public speaking), memorizing a script is a skill, and just being comfortable on-camera is a skill.
So it will take a while for the writers that have what it takes to do video to make their way, but when they do I think it will really pay dividends: seo, trust-building, possible bigger media exposure (ie. TV).
Sherman Hu replied | Sep 16, 2009 (1 comment)
Great post, Adam. Appreciate your valid points in the convenience and effectiveness of text/image blogging, as compared to video blogging.
With a background in SEO, knowing full well that the search engines suck up text into their indexes like no tomorrow, entering into the world of video was an experiment in attraction, engagement and conversion.
The process I deployed had to be quick (to shoot & view), easy to setup, easy to deploy and accommodate text+images for visitors and engines alike.
With that in mind, I met my objectives by:
01. Keeping my videos short (1 min to 7 min max) – so it doesn’t require much of my audience’s bandwidth and time, but still giving them valuable takeaways
02. Leaving my camcorder on a tripod setup in front of my desk all the time (so all I needed to do was plug in my FIrewire cable to my Macbook Pro, open up my software and click Record)
03. Easily transcribing my videos to text via services like CastingWords.com so I could serve my audience with multiple formats of content (video, audio, images & text) while giving the search engines what they want.
What I’ve discovered in my 2 years of experimenting with web video is…
A. It does take time to create video, but systems and processes help a bunch!
i. This is one of the reasons why I migrated to live video production, ie ShermanHu.tv, with a weekly web TV show titled the “Half Hour Huddle”. All I needed to do was show up, press Record, produce content, press Stop, and my video was ready for embedding to my blog (shortcutting the tedious process of ‘Edits’, ‘Exports’ and ‘Uploads’)
B. My 3-Act process of creating a video helps my clients and I (ShermanLive.com) easily piece together a video that’s professional, value-added, and conversion-compelling – this is something that anyone can use as its in your mind as you create your videos, so no need for notes or reading off a teleprompter ;-)
B. It does take a professional approach, but what audiences really want is the “juice”
I’m not saying being unprofessional or boring won’t hurt your credibility and results. With a business or entrepreneurial audience who has low bandwidth of time and attention, keeping it real and giving good valuable information in bite-sized chunks is what really matters. I get very impatient when a talent rambles on and on without getting to the point, so I do the opposite and consult my clients to do the same too.
C. Text content, alongside your video content, helps your audiences and the search engines too
People want choice. Giving them a choice of video or text transcript will make them happy, so I do both as often as I can.
Personally, I prefer reading a PDF over a lengthy video, as I can scan for the nuggets of info much faster. However, there are many who clamor for videos as they prefer that medium.
Plus, search engines like Google dig your text content. However, they’re indexing videos (well titled and described) very effectively now. I’ve discovered that a smart video syndication strategy well deployed will help you dominate the conversation in your space in a matter of hours. Assuming your video is effective, this gets you fresh new visitors, boosts your credibility, influence and potentially conversions.
D. There are many ways to skin the “Video Cat”
One doesn’t need to be deploying full motion video (ie Talking Head Video). There are many ways to create dynamic videos (eg screencasting videos, photo-slideshow videos with voice overs, Animoto-style videos etc) that will give you similar impact and results.
Adam, I didn’t mean for this comment to be so lengthy, sorry. (Maybe I need to blog this on my own blog, eh? LOL) Hopefully, this sheds some light for your audience who are considering video. I believe if one takes your post seriously, combined with some of my tips, they can deploy a multi-prong strategy that will help them effectively attract and engage a large following and increase their conversions to their offerings. Cheers! ;-)
Adam Singer replied | Sep 16, 2009 (594 comments)
Really appreciate this comment Sherman, great insights here!
Steve replied | Sep 24, 2009 (2 comments)
I agree that watching a video takes too much time. Similar to pod casts. With text you can skim and look for the top headings that interest you and skip the test.
CrystalsQuest replied | Oct 1, 2009 (2 comments)
The bottom line is, different people learn and like to get their information differently. If video isn’t mainstream yet, then why is you-tube one of the most visited sites on the web? Sure, it hasn’t taken over from blogs, but it never will – they’re different media! There’ll always be room for video as well as text blogging. Because it’s a different skill-set, it’s not likely to have a huge crossover, just like there’s not a huge number of juggling clown accountants (I presume).
I agree, though, that in these time-crunched times, something that forces you to commit to however many minutes the clip is, doesn’t look as attractive. I download videos where I can and play in faster speed. Online, there isn’t the option to do that. I also can’t gauge how relevant it is to me until I’ve put the time into it. These are the major drawbacks.
Where there’s a text transcript I can scan, I will. My time is too valuable to give away without a good idea if it will end up being useful, or fun to watch, or just a waste of precious time I don’t have.
PS The tech for searching video is starting to emerge, (like blinkx) but of course those indexes take a while to build up.
Denise replied | Oct 8, 2009 (2 comments)
I think the fundamental reason is that most people just don’t come across well on video. The people who are paid to be on TV are well-groomed, well-dressed, know how to address the camera, speak well (articulate, pleasant tone of voice, etc.) and have a high energy level. Whether right or wrong, I believe most people approach vlogs with this same set of expectations.
I also agree with CrystalsQuest that most people don’t want to take the time to watch a vlog post, which tend to go on too long.
Chris Dowell replied | Oct 9, 2009 (1 comment)
I agree that video blogging isn’t mainstream yet, but it is gaining speed. With YouTube.com one of the most visited websites, video blogging is just around the corner.
Marcie replied | Oct 14, 2009 (1 comment)
This was very inspirational to me because I am considering adding video to my blog, but I am camera shy. However, I am willing to learn what needs to be done to make it happen. Thanks so much for this.
Stephan Filmgauge replied | Jan 17, 2010 (1 comment)
Video blogging is becoming more and more popular. 70% of all content in the web is already video…