<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Underused Strategy:  Cause Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/09/01/controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/09/01/controversy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=controversy</link>
	<description>Adam Singer on digital marketing and online PR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:56:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Singer</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/09/01/controversy/#comment-26195</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=5031#comment-26195</guid>
		<description>Strategies are neither &quot;cynical&quot; or &quot;positive&quot; by themselves, in fact they are quite neutral.  It is all application and interpretation that provides these subjective terms.
Don&#039;t necessarily close yourself off to strategies - at least considering them - just because they may be interpreted by some as cynical.  Others may not see it as such.
TechCrunch didn&#039;t get to become what they are without a little controversy.  Now they are able to do good things due to the status they have achieved, like put new startups in the spotlight.  Besides, the web itself *loves* a good controversy, it may be a guilty pleasure but there you have it.
As marketers, we need to be at least conscious of all possible approaches.  I think understanding dynamics is important - maybe not applicable for all brands and purposes but don&#039;t turn away from certain techniques because they have a stigma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strategies are neither &#8220;cynical&#8221; or &#8220;positive&#8221; by themselves, in fact they are quite neutral.  It is all application and interpretation that provides these subjective terms.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t necessarily close yourself off to strategies &#8211; at least considering them &#8211; just because they may be interpreted by some as cynical.  Others may not see it as such.</p>
<p>TechCrunch didn&#8217;t get to become what they are without a little controversy.  Now they are able to do good things due to the status they have achieved, like put new startups in the spotlight.  Besides, the web itself *loves* a good controversy, it may be a guilty pleasure but there you have it.</p>
<p>As marketers, we need to be at least conscious of all possible approaches.  I think understanding dynamics is important &#8211; maybe not applicable for all brands and purposes but don&#8217;t turn away from certain techniques because they have a stigma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jé Maverick</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/09/01/controversy/#comment-26194</link>
		<dc:creator>Jé Maverick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=5031#comment-26194</guid>
		<description>I could not disagree any more than I am right now. This is quite a cynical approach, don&#039;t you think?
Knowingly and purposefully creating controversy won&#039;t win respect. In the long run, respect will serve you better than your ability to pick a fight, start a flame war, call people names, or otherwise muddy the water for personal gain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not disagree any more than I am right now. This is quite a cynical approach, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>Knowingly and purposefully creating controversy won&#8217;t win respect. In the long run, respect will serve you better than your ability to pick a fight, start a flame war, call people names, or otherwise muddy the water for personal gain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

