Looks like some of the early adopter crowd are waking up from their Twitter-induced dreams.
There are several conversations around the web about it this week, but I’ll sum the reasons you should blog and not just Tweet simply: microblogging (or any social platform where you don’t control the rules) doesn’t replace the power of an independent web publishing platform where you control the vertical and the horizontal. Rather, if used properly it actually makes your independent outlet that much more powerful.
It’s funny to me that people think blogging is “making a comeback.” In terms of what? Being a topic of conversation with the early adopters or in web-industry media? What does that have to do with the hordes of artists, marketers, businesses, hobbyists, foodies, moms and everyone in-between who have embraced personal publishing and are discovering real benefits from it daily? Not very much. The truth is blogging never lost its utility or groove. Even further, lifestreaming would actually be pretty boring without blogs.
In fact, forget about the word blogging for a minute and consider all the platform enables: an easy way to build relationships and share ideas in an area that is unique to you or your business. I’m not sure how monolithic communities that throw everyone together into uniform layouts can disrupt something unique. It’s like saying Starbucks is going to replace your local coffee shop. Sure, your local coffee shop won’t scale, but maybe the experience there is so unique it would lose what made it special if it did.
Other points to keep in mind about the blogging/lifestreaming conversations:
- Everyone uses the web differently – don’t ever make assumptions others get content just like you do. Just because you’re using every bleeding edge service doesn’t mean everyone is.
- The early adopters certainly use the web far differently from the average user.
- Blogging allows you to reach regular users through email – the largest social network. In fact, around 1,000 subscribers here are reading this through email. If I was only on sites like Twitter or FriendFeed, I’d never be able to share my thoughts with those people who prefer content there.
- Content producers are a creative bunch and demand control of how their content is presented. Blogs enable this by their very nature. Monolithic social networks make you play within the lines.
- There is no “right” or “wrong” way to produce or consume content. Despite the method of how you are getting it, it’s sort of irrelevant how it comes to you if it’s efficient and in a format that you enjoy.
- Funny how a writer for TechCrunch previously declared RSS dead. TechCrunch proudly displays their FeedBurner widget on the bottom of their blog showing close to 3 million RSS readers. I’m one of them, and their content rocks – but that idea is rich with irony. Lifestreaming services actually continue to increase the utility of RSS.
- Imagine all that time you spent growing a presence in a social network, and then that network falls out of favor. The best part about independent publishing is the niche audience aspect – bearing you continuously deliver value, your small but loyal audience will stick with you.
- Vanity URLS like Facebook.com/YourName or Twitter.com/YourName are nice, but a catchy domain name is even better.
At the end of the day, comparing Twitter or lifestreaming to blogs is really an apples to oranges discussion, I’m not convinced they are in competition – I would say they work together. I also have firsthand seen the opportunities afforded both personally and professionally as a marketer, artist and writer through blogging. More doors only open up the more I go forward, and I truly hope others haven’t been influenced at any point to not develop their own publishing platform and purely work in someone else’s.
Related posts from The Future Buzz
Blogging Is Like Going To The Gym…For Your Brain
10 Things Marketing Professionals Starting Out Should Do
Interview With A Pro Blogger: Sarah Perez
Related posts from around the web
Your Blog Is An Island (Marketing.fm)
Is The Real Time Web A Solution In Search Of A Problem? (Regular Geek)
Will Websites be the Social Networks of the Future? (Daily Blog Tips)
The Future Buzz is a blog run by communications professional Adam Singer. Adam has experience as both a digital PR strategist and online marketing manager for some of the top-rated brands globally
Louis Gray (7 comments)19 July 09
What are you telling everyone for?!
Let them go Tweet. We’ll keep blogging. :)
Chad Harris (1 comments)19 July 09
Its an ease thing. I was thinking Lazyfeed might really make me subscribe to more feeds, which in turn makes me aware I need to post more stories. But reality feedly is still easier for me. Once they have a way to really make feeds even easier to consume, the supply of blog posts will swing right back up. For me the more feeds I consume the more I think about posting.
Matt Soreco (1 comments)19 July 09
Well said! Nothing irks me more than these kinds of pronouncements from so called thought leaders.
Heidi Cool (2 comments)20 July 09
I’ve continuously seen blogging as the backbone of any social media strategy, be it personal or for business. Our blogs create a home base for us, where we present the material we want in the way that we want. Our blogs also give us a place to steer our calls to action, giving direction to the people who landed on our site by way of Twitter, StumbleUpon etc.
Social media service are great but sometimes the conversation needs a place to go–a place where it can be expanded beyond character limits and services with limited tools for archival searches.
Blogs provide a central repository for the conversation. Sure I love it when my blog posts get re-tweeted. But if the comments are scattered across Twitter, so is the conversation. When people comment on a blog, then anyone can see the discussion whether they view it the day an entry is posted or discover it 3 years later during a Web search. By then those Tweets, Facebook comments, etc. are scattered to the wind.
This is important both for our own blogs and the way we interact with other blogs. If I simply Tweet the link to this post and share it in Google Reader, then others will see it and know that I felt it was worth reading. But if I comment on this entry and then share the link, people will also be able to see how I reacted and what my opinion really was. That’s not something I could fit into a 140 character Tweet.
If they in turn follow the link, comment and retweet, then the depth of the discussion grows here, while the breadth of it continues to disperse throughout the Twittersphere. While I don’t comment on every link I share, being able to do so makes it possible to communicate far more than I could with just a link.
There are of course many ways that blogs and social media services work in tandem, but overall I like to think of our blogs as the hubs of our online communication strategies.
Long live blogs!
Vaillant Poznan (1 comments)20 July 09
How much can you convey in 160 characters? Honestly there’s no way twitter will replace blogging simply because it doesn’t let you tell anything constructive to your readers.
Dave Levy (1 comments)20 July 09
All that content and links that get tweeted out? They have to start somewhere – same reason RSS won’t go anywhere. Low adoption does not mean death, but the funnel will always start with long content like blogs, through RSS, to people who read and then post it on social networks.
Christopher Ming Ryan (17 comments)20 July 09
One of the reasons (I think) that folks are going on and on about blogging being dead vs. lifestreaming is because blogging is damn hard.
Let’s admit it. It’s a lot easier to tweet a few times or post an iPhone pic to posterous and say to yourself that you’re done for the day.
Blogging takes some serious time and effort.
From what I have found, the rewards and satisfaction in this space are in direct proportion to the amount of time and effort I put into it.
Brisbane Chiropractor (1 comments)21 July 09
I agree, they should not be considered as two opposing forces but two complimentary things that will definitely supplant each others inefficiency or whatever is lacking. :)
Chris Norton (1 comments)21 July 09
Great post Adam and I totally agree. I would also add that blogging can help position someone as a thought leader such as yourself. Twitter on the other hand can show that you get engaged in conversation and are approachable. Twitter is a fantastic tool but it won’t replace blogging as it has more longevity.
Marketing Donut (3 comments)23 July 09
Blogging is a great way for businesses, brands or people to add an element of personality and conversation to their site etc. it builds platforms for discussion and the sharing of ideas, not just about yourself/your product/ your service but the ideas of others within your network
Avery (3 comments)26 July 09
I can not agreement any more.And I will always blog.