<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media And Web Publishing:  Interview With John Boitnott</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/06/09/social-media-interview-john-boitnott/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/06/09/social-media-interview-john-boitnott/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=social-media-interview-john-boitnott</link>
	<description>Adam Singer on digital marketing and online PR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:56:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/06/09/social-media-interview-john-boitnott/#comment-24776</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=4204#comment-24776</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article, Adam. A lot of good info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article, Adam. A lot of good info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: old media</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/06/09/social-media-interview-john-boitnott/#comment-24677</link>
		<dc:creator>old media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=4204#comment-24677</guid>
		<description>The reason TV news and Web sites get &quot;quite a bit&quot; (if not all) of their material from the newspaper is that the print reporters who unearthed this stuff didn&#039;t have to worry about social media and page views. These concerns are as different as the quick hit and the bull&#039;s eye. Both are important, but once in a while you&#039;ve got to nail it -- and you probably won&#039;t do that if you&#039;re busy tweeting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason TV news and Web sites get &#8220;quite a bit&#8221; (if not all) of their material from the newspaper is that the print reporters who unearthed this stuff didn&#8217;t have to worry about social media and page views. These concerns are as different as the quick hit and the bull&#8217;s eye. Both are important, but once in a while you&#8217;ve got to nail it &#8212; and you probably won&#8217;t do that if you&#8217;re busy tweeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

