<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Proofing As Part Of Your Marketing Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/06/01/social-proofing-marketing-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/06/01/social-proofing-marketing-strategy/</link>
	<description>Adam Singer on media, marketing and PR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:42:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex - unleash reality</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/06/01/social-proofing-marketing-strategy/#comment-24636</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex - unleash reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=4073#comment-24636</guid>
		<description>really interesting application of social proofing to online (i&#039;m familiar with it in the social capacity :) ) 

i&#039;m kinda torn about it though - would love to hear your take on this...

on the one hand, good &#039;ol economics rationality theory - the disclosure principle. you should disclose numbers (ones you referred to - feed subscribers for instance) because not disclosing them when others are leads the consumer (readers) to assume that they are low (even though they may not be - hence underplaying your site&#039;s social proof) 

on the other hand though, your site may have few subscribers because it&#039;s new - not because it&#039;s bad or anything else. in this case showing the number of subscribers could lead people away from it (judge blog by it&#039;s cover :P ) so i&#039;d prolly be inclined (as i&#039;m doing on my site) to not show subscriber numbers until they&#039;re at a show-offable level :)

interesting ideas all round

subscribed :) +1 to social proof. go team!

all the best
alex - unleash reality</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really interesting application of social proofing to online (i&#8217;m familiar with it in the social capacity :) ) </p>
<p>i&#8217;m kinda torn about it though &#8211; would love to hear your take on this&#8230;</p>
<p>on the one hand, good &#8216;ol economics rationality theory &#8211; the disclosure principle. you should disclose numbers (ones you referred to &#8211; feed subscribers for instance) because not disclosing them when others are leads the consumer (readers) to assume that they are low (even though they may not be &#8211; hence underplaying your site&#8217;s social proof) </p>
<p>on the other hand though, your site may have few subscribers because it&#8217;s new &#8211; not because it&#8217;s bad or anything else. in this case showing the number of subscribers could lead people away from it (judge blog by it&#8217;s cover :P ) so i&#8217;d prolly be inclined (as i&#8217;m doing on my site) to not show subscriber numbers until they&#8217;re at a show-offable level :)</p>
<p>interesting ideas all round</p>
<p>subscribed :) +1 to social proof. go team!</p>
<p>all the best<br />
alex &#8211; unleash reality</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Donut</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/06/01/social-proofing-marketing-strategy/#comment-24590</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Donut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 08:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=4073#comment-24590</guid>
		<description>Excellent article - Really liked the violinist example with success inversly proportional to talent. It really is all about getting yourself out there but i think that if the product is of an excellent quality that will speak volumes too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article &#8211; Really liked the violinist example with success inversly proportional to talent. It really is all about getting yourself out there but i think that if the product is of an excellent quality that will speak volumes too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ukhustle</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/06/01/social-proofing-marketing-strategy/#comment-24586</link>
		<dc:creator>ukhustle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 19:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=4073#comment-24586</guid>
		<description>Brilliant article which describes the fickle world we live in, without a doubt it seems that the more something appears popular the more popular it becomes. The violinist example is a prime example of how things within the music industry are, the top selling artists are very rarely the most musically talented.

http://www.ukhustle.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant article which describes the fickle world we live in, without a doubt it seems that the more something appears popular the more popular it becomes. The violinist example is a prime example of how things within the music industry are, the top selling artists are very rarely the most musically talented.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ukhustle.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ukhustle.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/06/01/social-proofing-marketing-strategy/#comment-24584</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=4073#comment-24584</guid>
		<description>Social proofing is a big part of life in general, especially on the web.  In my personal movie blog, I am having trouble getting comments going because of lack of social proofing.  Usually once there is a few, people are more likely to leave a comment.  Same goes for RSS, once they see the numbers, people are more likely to subscribe which is why I currently hide it.  For business I am about to begin personally pitching bloggers about our new site (let me know if it&#039;s ok if I can send you information) and am hoping that social proofing will develop to PR from the smaller guys and eventually lead to the bigger fish.  I know it usually works the other way around but when you are a smaller start-up it is difficult to develop relationships with those bigger fish.  Either way, social proof has a lot to do with everything, whether about a site, or figuring out what bar is popular on a Friday night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social proofing is a big part of life in general, especially on the web.  In my personal movie blog, I am having trouble getting comments going because of lack of social proofing.  Usually once there is a few, people are more likely to leave a comment.  Same goes for RSS, once they see the numbers, people are more likely to subscribe which is why I currently hide it.  For business I am about to begin personally pitching bloggers about our new site (let me know if it&#8217;s ok if I can send you information) and am hoping that social proofing will develop to PR from the smaller guys and eventually lead to the bigger fish.  I know it usually works the other way around but when you are a smaller start-up it is difficult to develop relationships with those bigger fish.  Either way, social proof has a lot to do with everything, whether about a site, or figuring out what bar is popular on a Friday night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
