<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Real Value Of Your Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/04/17/value-of-your-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/04/17/value-of-your-network/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=value-of-your-network</link>
	<description>Adam Singer on digital marketing and online PR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Connor</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/04/17/value-of-your-network/#comment-24148</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=3278#comment-24148</guid>
		<description>Thought provoking post Adam. One thing I&#039;d like to bring up is the stigma associated with and flat out grief that people give others for not &quot;following&quot; more people on twitter or for following only a fraction of the people who follow them. I personally feel that everyone has the right to tailor their network in a way that works for them, even though I nearly bought into that mindset given that it is so pervasive. I also feel that you may not have as many active participants in that huge network of &quot;followers&quot; as you may think. The one-size-fits all attitude about how various platforms &quot;should&quot; work is a real disservice and I hope that people feel empowered to do their own thing, their own way because that is how you will get the results you&#039;re looking for and build a great network.
Angela &#124; @communitygirl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought provoking post Adam. One thing I&#8217;d like to bring up is the stigma associated with and flat out grief that people give others for not &#8220;following&#8221; more people on twitter or for following only a fraction of the people who follow them. I personally feel that everyone has the right to tailor their network in a way that works for them, even though I nearly bought into that mindset given that it is so pervasive. I also feel that you may not have as many active participants in that huge network of &#8220;followers&#8221; as you may think. The one-size-fits all attitude about how various platforms &#8220;should&#8221; work is a real disservice and I hope that people feel empowered to do their own thing, their own way because that is how you will get the results you&#8217;re looking for and build a great network.<br />
Angela | @communitygirl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Singer</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/04/17/value-of-your-network/#comment-24146</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=3278#comment-24146</guid>
		<description>@Mark Dykeman - they did create specific projects with the sole purpose of engaging only the really interested people.  Those are what I was referring to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark Dykeman &#8211; they did create specific projects with the sole purpose of engaging only the really interested people.  Those are what I was referring to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/04/17/value-of-your-network/#comment-24144</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=3278#comment-24144</guid>
		<description>I see what you are getting at, but I&#039;m not sure either Godin&#039;s or Calacanis are really good examples of smaller, intimate groups.  In both cases, these networks number in the thousands of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you are getting at, but I&#8217;m not sure either Godin&#8217;s or Calacanis are really good examples of smaller, intimate groups.  In both cases, these networks number in the thousands of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marci Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/04/17/value-of-your-network/#comment-24142</link>
		<dc:creator>Marci Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=3278#comment-24142</guid>
		<description>These are great points.. I attended an all day sales conference today and there was a lot of conflicting advice about building networks and whether quantity or quality was better. I agree with you.. less is more. Quality trumps quantity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are great points.. I attended an all day sales conference today and there was a lot of conflicting advice about building networks and whether quantity or quality was better. I agree with you.. less is more. Quality trumps quantity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

