
I frequently get pitched to cover businesses or other websites at this blog. Most of it isn’t a fit or just pure spam. As a marketing/PR professional by trade, I’m patient and take the time to help those who send me irrelevant pitches by pointing them to some tips for pitching bloggers.
But the other day something rare happened. I received a pitch from Morgan von Ancken of Morton PR, the AOR of Shutterstock.com to write a story on the company. And…it was good.
Shutterstock.com is a stock photography and stock footage site that uses crowdsourcing to generate its image library (they have more than 6 million stock photos). This means that by outsourcing the task of taking pictures to people around the world, they are able to offer high quality stock imagery and footage at a more affordable price point than traditional agencies, like Getty or Corbis.
I’m going to share just part of the pitch with you – the most important part, the intro:
Hi Adam,
As someone in the PR world, your blog has been on my radar for a while; I especially enjoyed your post earlier this month about the “irrational fear of the web“. I should also mention that I am keenly aware of the irony implicit in pitching something to a PR blogger, but I was reading through your page today, and I noticed how many images you use to accompany your posts. Shutterstock.com, might be interesting to you and your readers….
Morgan then went on to provide some background information on the company and offer the CEO of Shutterstock for interview.
I bolded the two parts of this pitch that stood out and hooked me to read the rest of the email. Morgan showed he has been hanging around here, knew my blog well, and then made the observation that one of his clients would be a good fit for my content. And he’s correct, this was highly relevant. I frequently use images in posts, and am such a fan of good imagery I have even taken the time to build galleries (see inspirational images and stunning images) from Flickr as I am consistently impressed by the quality of the content in that network.
By this point, I dig the company already, and the PR pro made good inroads with me. I decided I wasn’t interested in interviewing their CEO, but thought for a minute and realized there is a potentially more valuable relationship here to be unlocked. Shutterstock is a service that provides a product I use frequently on this site: images. And, while I am both a creative commons artist and supporter of the Flickr community, I am open to using any and all images that are of high quality, regardless of source.
I responded back to Morgan with a simple counter-offer:
Provide me an account to test drive Shutterstock, I’ll browse the images and if I find any I like, I’ll use them in my posts. Seems like a win-win, I get unique, high-quality images to use which make my blog look good and Shutterstock gets the image attribution in my post instead of Flickr. Images (with attribution) being featured are actually better PR for them than written words can ever be because they showcase the quality of their site. Visuals tell the story.
Shutterstock had never done this before, but Morgan is a pro and made it happen for me. Initial impression? It rocks, and right now I’m working on a Shutterstock vs. Flickr post that gives a rundown of both services.
A quick idea for Shutterstock
I’m still jazzed Shutterstock is letting me test drive their product, and in fact I’m going to go an extra step and give them an idea which could help their growth: build a program to bridge their product with bloggers as a low cost, highly visibility marketing vehicle.
The plan would be simple:
- Scale what they did for me here for around 50 or even 100 other quality sites through a blog partnership program.
- Invite quality bloggers who frequently use images in their content (this should be simple enough, Chris Brogan, Louis Gray, Darren Rowse all do, just off the top of my head) and make the offer to take the Pepsi challenge vs Flickr.
Access to ultra-high quality, professional images to make posts stand out is a really compelling offer that would be difficult to turn down, especially when there are good people behind the product and marketing. It is win-win, because Shutterstock gets exposure for their service, and bloggers get high quality images.
Note that Shutterstock is a paid service, so this would have to come out of their budget. With that said it’s really worth it for them to consider taking a little bit out of the ad budget to give popular bloggers subscriptions. Seems like huge return for a minimal in-kind cost to get their content featured front and center, in the editorial parts of well-trafficked sites.
For this trial, they provided a 30-day sample subscription which allows me to snag up to 25 images a day. This is actually overkill – I really only need one a day. Giving one image a day (perhaps 5 a day for full-time bloggers) is a far cheaper and more effective option than buying advertising on a popular blog. Everyone is guaranteed to see each image, plus the credit – even in RSS as it is part of the content.
Related posts from The Future Buzz
Blogger Relations: Two Approaches For PR
10 Reasons Why Organizations (And Individuals) With Audiences Win
Organic Traffic Building: The Only Way To Grow A Sustainable Web Brand
Related posts from around the web
How to Use the Web to Build A Powerful Reputation In Any Industry (Dosh Dosh)
Beautiful Pictures For Spring Inspiration (Smashing Magazine)
10 Questions to Ask When Taking a Digital Photo (Digital Photography School)
Post image credit: Shutterstock.com
The Future Buzz is a blog run by communications professional Adam Singer. Adam has experience as both a digital PR strategist and online marketing manager for some of the top-rated brands globally
Nate @ Debt-free Scholar (7 comments)24 March 09
You both definitely got a good deal! I am always amazed at how many books you can get for free by reviewing them.
Thanks,
Nate
Steven Hodson (3 comments)24 March 09
That is a hellva great promo idea and one that really wouldn’t put too much of a hurt on their budget especially if they associated with some of the more popular bloggers.
Adam Singer (266 comments)24 March 09
@Nate @ Debt-free Scholar – I think we both received a mutual benefit, and that is a *huge* key for good PR/marketing.
@Steven Hodson – exactly, it does not seem like this would be expensive. They should also think carefully about who to target. For instance, my readers are mostly other bloggers, marketers and PR professionals – so if those are potential clients, they should target more blogs like mine. Definitely important to have a strategy behind doing something like this.
Cyntia Bravo (4 comments)24 March 09
Good ideas make good jobs. Just perfect! Shutterstock Knows who they need to reach, and this blog is certainly the way.
Jackie (2 comments)24 March 09
First of all, great idea. My friend is a very active blogger and was always raving about his Shutterstock account. One day it hit me… hello!? I should post Vector art to Shutterstock and see if anything happens. It has. I have been doing pretty well selling art up there and I always wonder where and how it is being used!!
Anyway, check out where I landed on Shutterstock if you have a chance:
http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery.mhtml?id=309385
I would highly recommend using their service for selling microstock… good stuff and low prices.
Enjoy your test drive!
-Jackie
Adam Singer (266 comments)24 March 09
@Jackie – thanks for linking your page, your art is great!
Steven Bradley (14 comments)24 March 09
Great example of a win-win. And to think it all started out because someone took the time to know your blog before contacting you.
Stephen - Rat Race Trap (6 comments)24 March 09
Blogs are an ideal way to advertise and reach a lot of people. Seth Godin recently published a post which made that same point. I’ve never heard of Shutterstock but now I’m checking them out. I guess that was the point huh?
Jackie (2 comments)25 March 09
@Adam – Thanks so much! You on twitter?? I am: http://twitter.com/jstukey
A Kallevig (1 comments)25 March 09
Nice win-win work. Tip: If you’re gonna do a Shutterstock comparison piece and want to learn more about microstock in general, I suggest you check out http://www.microstockdiaries.com/
Adam Singer (266 comments)25 March 09
@Steven Bradley – exactly, it is amazing how many people forget to take that simple step.
@Stephen – Rat Race Trap – it’s PR, not advertising, they didn’t pay me to write any of this. They took the time to build a relationship with me and allow me to try their product – an even more valuable relationship.
@Jackie – NP and yes I’m on Twitter (@AdamSinger)
@A Kallevig – thanks, that is a useful site, I will read through it.
Justin Kownacki (1 comments)25 March 09
Very smart on multiple levels. Not only do you get perks that help you review a site (and thereby avoid any “payola” claims), but Shutterstock gets the added value of being listed as a test case for companies who understand how to converse with bloggers. Everyone wins…
… including other companies, desperate for Google juice, whom I now fear will copy-and-paste Shutterstock’s email above, change the words around, and then feed through an auto-spammer. (Bloggers: look out.)
Adam Singer (266 comments)25 March 09
@Justin Kownacki – Agreed on everyone winning.
Just to clarify one thing though – I don’t think Shutterstock is doing this for Google juice (nor do they look to need that) – they want endorsements/honest reviews of their product and some WOM buzz.
This is a bit complex of a path to go if all they wanted was Google juice, there are even simpler ways they could get more organic links (like starting a Shutterstock blog with great content or something similar).
But to be clear, in using their images in future posts I am using no-follow links because it is an image credit link, not an editorial link and I know there is a big to do about linking right now – I would rather not even risk going into the gray area for myself or Shutterstock among links that is emerging from things like this and will just use no-follow tag to be safe.
It’s unfortunate I even have to do that (they aren’t paying me cash, there is no “link scheme” involved, they never even asked me to link to them – I should be free to link to them with follow links if I want) but due to what I outlined in this thread I feel it is necessary just so there’s no risk or worry by anyone and our relationship is completely transparent. It’s such a gray area right now, let’s hope one day clearer lines are drawn.
Mario Sanchez Carrion (13 comments)27 March 09
Hi Adam:
What a difference a good pitch makes… Most pitchers are too polished and self serving, while others try to fake interest in what you are doing. A few, however, really show genuine interest in providing value both ways.
When they give me specific examples of why my readers would benefit from me covering their product and service, it shows me that they’ve done their homework. I may or may not cover their product, but I am definitely more inclined to read their emails again and establish a relationship.
This one was a great pitch, and in this case they not only got great coverage but also learned from your valuable suggestions. Win-win situation all around.
Tim Massie (1 comments)21 July 09
Adam, thanks for this post, which I RT-ed to my Marist College PR students and former students (I’m @tcmassie). You reinforced the dictum, “Know your audience,” and “be of assistance.”
Tim Massie
Adam Singer (266 comments)21 July 09
@Tim Massie – glad this could help some new PR students, appreciate you sharing this.