I’ve been called a web “expert” or “guru” by others both internally due to success with client work and externally from personal projects/my writings here. I don’t relish those terms – the word expert signifies a total understanding, something not possible in a media landscape that is rapidly shifting beneath our feet. I also don’t like the word guru, if only because it implies superiority — certainly I am confident, but let’s not confuse the two. Yes I write on social media, but I’m exploring it from the perspective of marketing as it has huge potential for that in particular. I do not nor would I encourage any of you to self-proclaim expert status.
Let’s get real here – social media expert or guru status could be conveyed on a tiny group of individuals – people like Kevin Rose, Mark Zuckerburg – who have developed multi-million dollar companies using SM. They’re about as close as you can get. Anyone else claiming expert status is kidding themselves.
This brings us to my point: you don’t need a self-proclaimed social media expert, you just need a good marketer. Any marketer worth their salt understands social media along with practical application by now — the best marketers are fluent in all media and able to develop ideas that spread.
While you can develop platform-specific marketing, good marketing itself is not about the platform, but about the idea. The platform is merely an enabler – and while an understanding of the platform is important – everyone should have that. It’s not unique or valuable – and if it is today because of a business digital divide, it will not be forever. I know this is obvious but I think it needs to be restated: what is valuable is the ability to produce strong PR and marketing for tangible results. It’s that simple.
Marketing managers, CMOs, PR professionals, etc. should be fluent in creating successful ideas and working with media and tools on all platforms. That is the basic requirement of success in the world of communications for today and tomorrow. Fluency with everything from what is possible in web app development, to strong writing, to branding campaigns, to working in modern CMS platforms, to SEO, to getting your communications themselves to spread, to relationship building and everything in between are all skills necessary.
In a bad economy (or any economy!) why would any company decide to choose marketing leaders lacking in any area of skills when those exist who are capable at working within all platforms. If you are a communications professional of any variety it is your job to put the pieces together and understand a fragmented media world from both the macro and platform-specific level. That is what good marketers of today and even more into the future will understand. It is not unfortunate that those who don’t play catch-up become irrelevant, because one of the core elements of being a communications professional is staying at the edge of how society communicates.
Demonstrating proficiency with the tools themselves is the low-level skill. That’s not where the talent exists, everyone should have the basic knowledge of working with the tools in the tool box. It is tantamount to being in construction and all of a sudden a new crane is developed which is more efficient than the old crane. The old crane may work fine for certain things that have always been done and still need to be done – but the new crane is far superior for a majority of tasks and it is now standard that all builders must be able to manipulate it. Some of the older builders may feel displaced by the fancy new crane – however the smart ones realize their old skills actually translate once they learn to operate the new crane and their years of experience still are an asset. But those who refuse to learn to operate the new crane will fade into irrelevancy since there exist those who can use both.
I’m not saying only having web-specific skills is relevant, and traditional media skills are not relevant – in reality, right now they both are. And that’s the point – there are enough people with strong, cross-platform skills that limiting yourself as a marketing professional is short-sided as you’ll merely be passed up for someone who can lead marketing initiatives on all grounds.
Agencies that specialize are a different story because in many cases specific needs are required by companies – however I believe the web-specific agencies that will be relevant both today and tomorrow are made up of team members who do not possess a myopic view of the world – rather, they understand the bigger picture of marketing and are adept with all tools. It just so happens the web is a bigger opportunity than any communications platform in the past has been for business, making a talented, web-focused agency too valuable to ignore for many types of businesses.
The bottom line is this: thinking in terms of tools or platforms is the wrong viewpoint (even within web-based tools specifically) as their use is only limited by your creativity. A literacy of all communications platforms is necessary, as then and only then do they fade into the background of your thought processes and allow you to develop groundbreaking solutions.
Related posts from The Future Buzz
The Shift Of Trusted, Influential Media: From Brands To People
5 Reasons You Should Learn About Social Media
Social Media Is Like The Matrix
Related posts from around the web
Get Out Of Your Own Way (6 Pixels Of Separation)
The difference between PR and publicity (Seth Godin)
Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable (Clay Shirky)
The Future Buzz is a blog run by communications professional Adam Singer. Adam has experience as both a digital PR strategist and online marketing manager for some of the top-rated brands globally
Michele (6 comments)16 March 09
Great points! Great marketers make great social media marketers, not the other way around. The key is integrating vehicles to connect and deliver to customers based on their communication preferences. Specializing is great, but when you specialize so much that you lose sight of or don’t have insight into the big picture it is a handicap.
Eric Logan (2 comments)16 March 09
Great Insights, Adam
The new tools that are evolving out of the social media space are becoming s benefit to early marketing adopters. Due to the nature of the medium users are categorizing their likes, interests and fellows thereby shortening exponentially the time required by a traditional marketer to find interested parties for both his content and products. Literacy across many platforms has become important. However a proficiency in communication skills has always been important and will continue to be so for top marketers. Social Media is just a new part of the conduit.
I look forward to reading more of your posts as a new a Subscriber.
Sarah Montague (2 comments)16 March 09
Amen. Any programs, whether new media, PR, advertising (all forms)or direct marketing, need to start with strategic objectives and a sense of marketing discipline that includes setting goals, measurement and a willingness to change programs when they don’t work.
Adam Singer (269 comments)16 March 09
@Michele – yes, exactly!
@Eric Logan – you wrote: “a proficiency in communication skills has always been important and will continue to be so for top marketers” – you nailed it right there. Glad to have you as a subscriber
@Sarah Montague – agreed, and there is nothing wrong with changing directions.
Gabriella (1 comments)16 March 09
Love it. It’s like when I owned a restaurant (another life) and did all the cooking. People would often call me the chef. Ughh, I was never trained nor did I go to a “Gordon Bleu” but here I was with an undeserved title. With that said for the last 20 years I have been doing what I was trained to do, “Market” and needless to say I can see how the pressure makes you want to shy away from Titles. It takes concise planning, define the objective, and target your niche market. Enjoyed your article it was spot on. Thanks
LJ Jones (2 comments)16 March 09
Great points. By some people self appointed definition of Social Media Expert, my wife is one. After all she has a blog, over 300 friends on Facebook, and could set up a profile on any platform needed. But like you said, proficiency with tools doesn’t guarantee successful marketing through social media. Companies need to find marketers who understand how social media can be used to accomplish marketing and business objectives.
Mike D. Merrill (2 comments)16 March 09
Adam,
Your post is so timely. @Gammill and I were just chatting about all the self-proclaimed social media experts who have never executed traditional marketing or have any formal education in the analytics associated with it. Reality is this is just one other way to reach your target audience. All these so called experts are sensationalizing the possibilities. Albeit, this is far less expensive than other media.
@mikedmerrill
John Z (1 comments)16 March 09
Best article I have seen on this topic. Cuts right through the hype – SM is just another tool to help you tell your story. Albeit a potentially wildly effective one if engaged properly.
Adam Dooley (1 comments)16 March 09
I think you’re bang on. Knowing how to use social media today is akin to knowing how to work with a printer, create a media plan or run an event. It’s how you use all these tools that’s important.
23Kazoos (1 comments)16 March 09
Adam, you’ve got great ideas for building buzz for your biz!! You’re one of my favs!
@23Kazoos
Adam Singer (269 comments)16 March 09
Thanks for the kudos everyone, I was hoping this would resonate.
Tim Jahn (60 comments)17 March 09
People get caught up in the tools all the time now it seems. But the tools are just that – tools.
It’s the underlying concepts you know that are going to beneficial.
The question isn’t “why isn’t your company on Twitter?”. The question is “why isn’t your company listening?”.
Helena Makhotlova (3 comments)17 March 09
Brilliant insight Adam – you’re spot on. Probably the best post I read so far this year. I just hope every marketer and every PR professional out there will read it – and rethink their paradigm. There is a truth in a saying ‘if all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail’ – there are just way too many craftsmen out there with just one tool in their toolbox.
Niall Cook (1 comments)17 March 09
What a refreshing point of view, and one which I don’t disagree with.
I do wonder, however, whether the logic of your argument also means that the CEO should be able to do the job of the marketer too? I think there’s a difference between understanding how something fits (ie. How marketing fits into the business strategy or how social media fits into the marketing strategy) and the physical ability to do it. From that perspective I believe that marketers will still need the help of platform “experts” in the same way that CEOs will always (thankfully) need marketers.
Boss (1 comments)17 March 09
Excellent and relevant article. Everyone seems to be a social media expert or guru of some kind. I find it hard to imagine someone can be an expert in social media when it hasn’t been around for that long.
I think the following quote sums it all up…
“the best marketers are fluent in all media and able to develop ideas that spread.”
If you are a marketer, you should be able to market on any platform, whether it’s in print, on TV, or online.
Jim Durbin (1 comments)17 March 09
I’d say you’re mostly right. Certainly any company planning to use social media in the context of marketing should be turning to a marketing expert, not a social media expert.
There are positions that would require someone versed in social media that aren’t marketers – and that includes public relations, customer service, and technology.
Social media is a tool, but it’s also a phenomenon. Marketers can use the tools of social media to improve their online marketing, but it’s a mistake to assume that social media is all about marketing.
At the same time, the big bucks in social media positions is for those who generate results, and I’d be laughed out of the room trying to place someone with no marketing background.
I tell candidates they get hired for their social media chops, but they get paid for their expertise.
Great post.
Danny Brown (9 comments)18 March 09
Perfect points and timely advice, Adam. We seem to be getting lost in all the New Romantic lure of social media and what it can offer, that we’re forgetting the mechanics behind it.
Getting yourself involved is one thing – getting yourself involved *properly* is another. You show me some of the best advances and case studies in social media, and I’d lay a fairly safe bet that behind them all is a good marketer.
By all means, enjoy the fruits; just don’t forget who tends the orchard to start with.
Linda Forrest (1 comments)18 March 09
What an excellent post, Adam. It’s refreshing to hear such sound reason amidst the cacophony of prospects excited about social media asking whether this is an area we specialize in, as though it’s truly a horse of a different colour, when in fact stellar marketing and outstanding content development are what matter, regardless of the channel used to reach the marketplace. We wrote about approaching social media with pragmatic enthusiasm last year on our blog here: http://inmedialog.com/index.php/archives/social-media-approach-with-pragmatic-enthusiasm/
Allison C. Bayer (1 comments)18 March 09
Thank you for building my base of knowledge! I’m just starting a website, blog, twitter, plinky . . . this article was food for thought and answered a question I didn’t even know I had! Thanks so much Adam. Allison in North Texas
Ben Pei (2 comments)19 March 09
Lol what I understand is that marketing is an on going process. Networking is an on going process. There is no such thing as good and you just gotta keep getting better.
Laurel Papworth (1 comments)5 May 09
Perhaps you don’t need a social media expert, you need good customer service? Cos frankly, marketing people tend to be rubbish at anything approaching answering questions, giving personal service, offering suggestions in community settings…