Social Media, Web 2.0 And Internet Stats

As our digital and physical lives blur further, the internet has become the information hub where people spend a majority of their time learning, playing and communicating with others globally.

Sometimes it is easy to lose sight of just how staggering the numbers are of people collaborating, researching, and interacting on the web.

I thought it might be fun to take a step back and look at some interesting/amazing social media, Web 2.0, crowdsourcing and internet statistics.  I tried to find stats that are the most up-to-date as possible at the time of publishing this post.

The numbers presented below should be a close representation of today’s numbers (please correct me in the comments if you find more recent numbers somewhere and I’ll update).

Let’s break them down by section:

Google search stats:

1,000,000,000,000 (one trillion) - approximate number of unique URLs in Google’s index (source)

2,000,000,000 (two billion) – very rough number of Google searches daily (source)

$110,000,000 – approximately amount of money lost by Google annually due to the “I’m Feeling Lucky” button (source)

24,400 – number of people employed by Google (December, 2008)

68,000,000 – the average number of times people Googled the word Google each month for the last year (source:  keyword tool)

$39.96 - the average cost per click for the phrase “consolidation of school loans” in AdWords (source:  keyword tool)

1,430,000 - the number of Google results for “Robert Scoble”

136,000 - the number of Google results for “Admiral Ackbar”

Wikipedia stats

2,695,205 - the number of articles in English on Wikipedia

684,000,000 – the number of visitors to Wikipedia in the last year

75,000 - the number of active contributors to Wikipedia

10,000,000 – the number of total articles in Wikipedia in all languages

260 – the number of languages articles have been written in on Wikipedia

(source)

YouTube stats

70,000,000 – number of total videos on YouTube  (March 2008)

200,000 – number of video publishers on YouTube (March 2008)

100,000,000 – number of YouTube videos viewed per day (this stat from 2006 is the most recent I could locate)

112,486,327 – number of views the most viewed video on YouTube has (January, 2009)

2 minutes 46.17 seconds – average length of video

412.3 years – length in time it would take to view all content on YouTube (March 2008)

26.57 - average age of uploader

13 hours – amount of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute

US $1.65 billion in Google stock – amount Google Inc. announced that it had acquired YouTube for in October 2006

$1,000,000 – YouTube’s estimated bandwidth costs per day

(sources here, here and here)

Blogosphere stats

133,000,000 – number of blogs indexed by Technorati since 2002

346,000,000 – number of people globally who read blogs (comScore March 2008)

900,000 – average number of blog posts in a 24 hour period

1,750,000 – number of RSS subscribers to TechCrunch, the most popular Technology blog (January 2009)

77% - percentage of active Internet users who read blogs

55% – percentage of the blogosphere that drinks more than 2 cups of coffee per day (source)

81 - number of languages represented in the blogosphere

59% – percentage of bloggers who have been blogging for at least 2 years

source

Twitter stats

1,111,991,000 – number of Tweets to date (see an up to the minute count here)

3,000,000 – number of Tweets/day(March 2008) (from TechCrunch)

165,414 - number of followers of the most popular Twitter user (@BarackObama) – but he’s not active

86,078 – number of followers of the most active Twitter user (@kevinrose)

63% – percentage of Twitter users that are male (from Time)

Facebook stats

200,000,000 – number of active users

100,000,000 - number of users who log on to Facebook at least once each day

170 - number of countries/territories that use Facebook

35 - number of different languages used on Facebook

2,600,000,000 – number of minutes global users in aggregate spend on Facebook daily

100 – number of friends the average user has

700,000,000 – number of photos added to Facebook monthly

52,000 – number of applications currently available on Facebook

140 - number of new applications added per day

source

Digg stats

236,000,000 – number of visitors attracted annually by 2008 (according to a Compete survey)

56% - percentage of Digg’s frontpage content allegedly controlled by top 100 users

124,340 - number of stories MrBabyMan, the number one user, has Dugg (see updated number here)

612 - number of stories from Cracked.com that have made page 1 of Digg (see all 41 pages of them here)

36,925 – number of Diggs the most popular story in the last 365 days has received (see story here)

Related posts from The Future Buzz

22 Smart, Inspirational Quotes From Bloggers In 2008

65 Bite-Sized Web Marketing Tips

50 Stunning Images From Flickr Under Creative Commons

Related posts from around the web

Social Media Trends 2009, TrendsSpotting (Read Write Web)

The Face of Facebook Global Report – Q4 2008 (Techno//Marketer)

56 Internet Goals To Get You Inspired for a Great 2009 (Daily Blog Tips)

Enjoy this article? Enter your email address below for a free subscription to receive future content just like this directly in your inbox. Your email address will not be shared.

 Subscribe in a reader

117 comments so far

  1. Adam,

    Just discovered your blog, and I have to say that it’s one of the best in the PR/marketing/social media space that I’ve seen yet. Great topics and content.

    Looking forward to reading more.

    Paul

    January 12th, 2009
  2. This is extremely useful information – especially when your job is to communicate the benefits of social media to small businesses. Thanks!

    January 12th, 2009
  3. 003 Dave Smay

    Great stats! Thanks so much for the time you took to gather all these stats in one, easy to view place. I’ll be using your material to back up a number of arguments I make in corporate marketing. Thanks again!

    January 12th, 2009
  4. 004 Simon

    These stats are mind-boggling! Whoa… And to think its exponential. Today, this. Tomorrow?

    January 12th, 2009
  5. and, bookmarked – I love stats. Great resource that I will probably cite a lot in my blog posts – thanks for compiling all these.

    January 12th, 2009
  6. Awesome stats! Thanks.

    January 12th, 2009
  7. 007 Timothy

    Wow. that’s all very interesting

    January 12th, 2009
  8. Nice job, Adam. Will visit again.

    January 12th, 2009
  9. Thanks for sharing stats on the social media sites. Very resoureful information.

    January 12th, 2009
  10. These are some serious stats. Never had any idea what the numbers were. This put things into perspective for marketing my blog. Thank you for the hard work in creating this and research of course.

    January 12th, 2009
  11. 011 Geoserv

    Wow, those are mind blowing figures. I never thought about Google losing money with the I’m Feeling Lucky button.

    Good post

    January 12th, 2009
  12. You say that http://twitter.com/kevinrose is the most active Twitter user. He may be the most followed, but http://twitter.com/jowyang is far more “active” with over 12,300 tweets.

    January 12th, 2009
  13. awesome statistics share.
    more sources for stats would be +awesome.

    January 12th, 2009
  14. where did you get these numbers and how often do you update them?
    great stuff btw.
    thanks

    January 12th, 2009
  15. 015 Michelle

    Amazing stats! Very helpful when your job centers on internet statistics. Thanks for all the great work.

    Michelle

    January 13th, 2009
  16. 016 Garu

    Cool Stats, cool blog. Thanks!

    January 13th, 2009
  17. Nice work, Adam. Would love to see Google’s stats vs. Yahoo! search and vs. Live search. Thanks for the info.

    January 13th, 2009
  18. This must have took a bit of work to compile. Nice job. Very useful!

    January 13th, 2009
  19. 019 John Belo

    Makes you think how small you are, particularly when starting up a new blog!

    January 13th, 2009
  20. 020 Mark

    Great article, Adam! Mind blowing stats! Did/Will you do any research on Flickr?
    Cheers,
    Mark

    January 13th, 2009
  21. @Mark – no, but that’s another good thought, it is worth digging – I’ll see if I can add some to my next Flickr roundup for you.

    @Everyone else – thanks for your comments, glad you enjoyed this.

    January 13th, 2009
  22. 022 TheFrosty

    That is quite an amazing list!!

    January 13th, 2009
  23. Awesome stats. Thank you for sharing.

    January 13th, 2009
  24. Outstanding compilation. Will be very helpful in presentations across gov’t to help convince folks why we need to be out there.

    There’s still a place for gov’t to have its own sites, but we also need to be where the people are.

    Jeffrey Levy
    Director of Web Communications
    US EPA

    January 13th, 2009
  25. These stats really opened my eyes regarding certain platforms like Digg. A comparison between 2008 and 2009 will be great, definitely looking forward to that.

    Thanks for putting up some great stats.

    Wayne Liew
    http://www.wayneliew.com

    January 14th, 2009
  26. Thanks for sharing nice information.

    January 14th, 2009
  27. 027 Peter

    Amazing collection. Thanks for pulling this together.

    January 15th, 2009
  28. Hi There,

    Great blog and coming from a statistics background, your impressive stats are a great read. No one can deny the explosive growth of Social Media and Social Networking

    January 15th, 2009
  29. Adam, Great job on these stats! Thank you for doing the research and giving the whole community one more piece of ammo in the arsenal. :)

    January 15th, 2009
  30. 030 Ed Illig

    There’s nothing like a good stat and you’ve certainly aggregated a number of good stats. Thanks for sharing them here, Adam.

    January 15th, 2009
  31. 031 Evan

    Nice post thanks…amazing stats!

    January 18th, 2009
  32. 032 Michael

    Really interesting, hope to get soon more stats from other popular services.

    January 19th, 2009
  33. 033 Russell

    How can YouTube turn a profit with those costs ??

    January 19th, 2009
  34. 034 Charles

    No kidding Russell. That means it costs $365 million dollars a year just for bandwidth. Add to that server costs, power costs, etc how can YouTube ever turn a profit?

    January 19th, 2009
  35. 035 Mariano

    Awesome stats! Thanks for sharing.

    January 19th, 2009
  36. Thanks you for this very interesting data ;)

    January 21st, 2009
  37. Great set of data – useful for presentations…thanks for compiling this cheat sheet

    January 22nd, 2009
  38. Somehow I doubt that many people actual search Google for the word “Google”. My guess would be that they have Google set as their browser’s “Default Search Engine” and when they type “google” into the address bar without the .com, the browser is automatically Googling “google”.

    January 28th, 2009
  39. wow. i guess this whole internet thing is a big deal, huh?

    January 28th, 2009
  40. Very very interesting!

    January 30th, 2009
  41. Dear Adam,

    The Statistics you provide are excellent and informative regarding Web2.0, I am wondering that how much popularity Web2.0 got within a little amount of time.

    January 31st, 2009
  42. I did not realize that Google was actually losing money on those “I’m Feeling Lucky” clicks

    January 31st, 2009
  43. @Joe – yes, it bypasses AdWords

    January 31st, 2009
  44. 044 Nihar

    I have to say this is great stat. Just curious to know how you have collated all this?

    February 2nd, 2009
  45. 045 Pelicano

    These Numbers are Awesome!

    February 3rd, 2009
  46. @Nihar – spent some time researching – I knew all of this content was out there, I wanted to put it all in one spot.

    February 3rd, 2009
  47. 047 goofydg1

    great stats.

    February 4th, 2009
  48. on blog readership — depends what you mean by “read blogs”. Forrester found last year that just 25% of the online population in the US read blogs at least monthly. So if your measure is “ever read blogs” then the 77% probably flies, but it’s also a bit misleading.

    February 4th, 2009
  49. This may help convince the cautious, the critical or the conservative that social media are huge today, and are most likely to stay. These figures also call for some comments. First, what makes this noteworthy is the fact that the sources of the information are provided. This is not always so on the web. Second, a figure that stands alone is at best impressive; it only becomes useful if you are given a basis of comparison, e.g. online versus offline, a web audience vs a newspaper or tv audience, surfers vs buyers, … Let’s be careful : figures are inherently misleading! We only make them meaningful by putting them into perspective.

    February 9th, 2009
  50. The stats are amazing. When you list them in this fashion, it really wakes one up. Nice article Loved it. Thanks.

    February 9th, 2009
  51. Just discovered your site from kimwoodbridge.com, and found lots of helpful posts here, it is quite interesting to know figures on this post, short listed our site.

    February 19th, 2009
  52. Thanks for sharing these amazing stats. I have already bookmarked this page and will use it when I talk to small business clients

    February 26th, 2009
  53. 053 dmar9

    Just starting out with some blogs and I must say the numbers are just a bit daunting, how many blogs actually get read with any frequency? There is practically one blog for every 2 readers!!

    March 8th, 2009
  54. @dmar9 – well of course, they are all of varying popularity and purpose. This page will help you make sense of it all (I know it is daunting): http://technorati.com/blogging/state-of-the-blogosphere/

    March 8th, 2009
  55. 055 BAE

    Nice information :-).

    March 12th, 2009
  56. 056 vyasjam

    What about adding the http://www.stumbleupon.com in the list ?

    March 19th, 2009
  57. @vyasjam – That’s a thought – I will see what stats I can pull

    March 19th, 2009
  58. These are great stats … but they’re missing a really important point. The fact is that social media really should be thought of as “a collaborative engagement platform.” While that may seem obvious, or a trivial label, it’s an important distinction. Collaborative engagement platforms have the power to truly transform the way organizations operate. When you can leverage user controlled/contributed content in a collaborative decision-making fashion you enable a productivity boost amongst traditional knowledge workers that is akin to robotic automation of traditional manual labor.

    The problem is that operating models in nearly every organization are based on a post-industrial revolution command/control structure and haven’t changed in the last 100 years. Sadly, most efforts aimed at leveraging the great platform components you’ve described here try to do so in these outmoded operating models (imagine a monthly “blog” written by the CEO … that’s precisely missing the point!)

    Here’s a link to an approach that a few companies have started to realize is necessary to really get the juice from squeezing the web 2.0 fruit:

    http://www.bis-insight.com/Site/The_Future_of_Productivity.html

    March 25th, 2009
  59. Nice stats – a comparison of how things have changes from 2008 to 2009 would help.

    A recent article suggests facebook leads the show while myspace is loosing a bit. Also, do we assume all the reported stats are correct ?
    http://www.jenesysgroup.com

    March 31st, 2009
  60. Impressive numbers. I wonder how Google can recognize all the good pages from bad ones. There are one trillion of them to choose from… lol, their algorithm must be really superb!

    April 8th, 2009
  61. Adam – Thanks for compiling such a comprehensive list. It was so well done I shared it with my company on our blog site (Picture Perfect San Diego).

    April 11th, 2009
  62. 062 Mallory

    This list was so helpful! Thanks for putting these together.

    You know what’s cool? @kevinrose – the user with the most followers – now has 480,220 followers and it’s only been a few months since you posted this. Twitter is growing like crazy!

    April 16th, 2009
  63. 063 Buscador

    Wow! Amazing numbers.. Just like the credit crisis, some of these figures are well beyond my imagination.

    April 27th, 2009
  64. amazing stats, just know from your blog. very useful information. how you get all stats?it’s just so good.

    May 6th, 2009
  65. Um.. How about yahoo and wordpress? Do you know how much those websites(listed above) can earn monthly or maybe daily?

    May 21st, 2009
  66. The stats proves that web 2.O is mushrooming like anything..
    Do you guys have any idea on what the next web 3.0 will cover?

    May 29th, 2009
  67. Informative post made for great reading, the numbers really are staggering. But it’s interesting to see that while there are many social networks (and more starting up) some are/will be fading out. In reality Twitter is only used by a very small percentage of people, the rest of the registered users are dormant. I believe it was a study by Harvard that showed only 10% of Twitterers generating 90% of tweets. (Almost like the taxes, 10% pay 90% of taxes ;)

    June 9th, 2009
  68. The stats are fantastic. The numbers listed are amazing and they do show the influence of internet in the world! Nice article. Congrats. Thanks.

    June 17th, 2009
  69. 069 preor

    Informative post made for great reading, the numbers really are staggering. But it’s interesting to see that while there are many social networks (and more starting up) some are/will be fading out. In reality Twitter is only used by a very small percentage of people, the rest of the registered users are dormant. I believe it was a study by Harvard that showed only 10% of Twitterers generating 90% of tweets. (Almost like the taxes, 10% pay 90% of taxes ;)

    June 27th, 2009

Trackbacks

Add a comment