<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 25 Examples Of Clean, Effective And Beautiful Web Design</title> <atom:link href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/07/30/25-examples-of-clean-effective-and-beautiful-web-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/07/30/25-examples-of-clean-effective-and-beautiful-web-design/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=25-examples-of-clean-effective-and-beautiful-web-design</link> <description>Adam Singer on digital marketing and online PR</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:54:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: g*</title><link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/07/30/25-examples-of-clean-effective-and-beautiful-web-design/#comment-24329</link> <dc:creator>g*</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:35:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/07/30/25-examples-of-clean-effective-and-beautiful-web-design/#comment-24329</guid> <description><![CDATA[Ehhhhh some of these sites may be effective, but &quot;clean&quot; they are not. Most are quite cluttered with many hierarchies competing for attention. Almost all use the same tired two-column+header/footer blog format with a lot of information present upfront with little to no filtration.
Sure, they do the job, but most don&#039;t really have much fun with it.
I agree with Peter, time for something new.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehhhhh some of these sites may be effective, but &#8220;clean&#8221; they are not. Most are quite cluttered with many hierarchies competing for attention. Almost all use the same tired two-column+header/footer blog format with a lot of information present upfront with little to no filtration.</p><p>Sure, they do the job, but most don&#8217;t really have much fun with it.</p><p>I agree with Peter, time for something new.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mai</title><link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/07/30/25-examples-of-clean-effective-and-beautiful-web-design/#comment-23118</link> <dc:creator>Mai</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:29:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/07/30/25-examples-of-clean-effective-and-beautiful-web-design/#comment-23118</guid> <description><![CDATA[Hi there --I am a web designer, and I accidentally ran across this post. Your article was great in pointing out that usability and a clean homepage are components in making a website look beautiful and effective. However, I was disappointed with many of the examples that you showed. I have seen some beautiful designs that have lots of content (such as apple.com as oppose to amazon.com). It seems a lot of your selections are websites that perhaps you are familiar with because you visit them often, and that you&#039;ve become accustomed to the way they present their information. You also included a lot of content-heavy and blog websites, which I think too often have too many links, options, and text and not enough hierarchy (think, wired.com). I&#039;d like to see a second part to this article that addresses more visual and less content heavy websites that are beautifully and effectively executed.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there &#8211;I am a web designer, and I accidentally ran across this post. Your article was great in pointing out that usability and a clean homepage are components in making a website look beautiful and effective. However, I was disappointed with many of the examples that you showed. I have seen some beautiful designs that have lots of content (such as apple.com as oppose to amazon.com). It seems a lot of your selections are websites that perhaps you are familiar with because you visit them often, and that you&#8217;ve become accustomed to the way they present their information. You also included a lot of content-heavy and blog websites, which I think too often have too many links, options, and text and not enough hierarchy (think, wired.com). I&#8217;d like to see a second part to this article that addresses more visual and less content heavy websites that are beautifully and effectively executed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Emlyn</title><link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/07/30/25-examples-of-clean-effective-and-beautiful-web-design/#comment-22321</link> <dc:creator>Emlyn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 14:52:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/07/30/25-examples-of-clean-effective-and-beautiful-web-design/#comment-22321</guid> <description><![CDATA[Being honest: While some of these designs may indeed be effective in their respective markets, most of these examples--with a few exceptions--don&#039;t strike me as particularly &quot;clean&quot; or &quot;beautiful&quot; website designs. In fact many of these aren&#039;t attractive at all.
For designs that, in my view, more closely fit the &quot;clean&quot; and &quot;beautiful&quot; labels, I suggest checking out some of the collections assembled on smashingmagazine.com, webcreme.com, and vandelaydesign.com.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being honest: While some of these designs may indeed be effective in their respective markets, most of these examples&#8211;with a few exceptions&#8211;don&#8217;t strike me as particularly &#8220;clean&#8221; or &#8220;beautiful&#8221; website designs. In fact many of these aren&#8217;t attractive at all.</p><p>For designs that, in my view, more closely fit the &#8220;clean&#8221; and &#8220;beautiful&#8221; labels, I suggest checking out some of the collections assembled on smashingmagazine.com, webcreme.com, and vandelaydesign.com.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sezam20</title><link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/07/30/25-examples-of-clean-effective-and-beautiful-web-design/#comment-13805</link> <dc:creator>sezam20</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:55:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/07/30/25-examples-of-clean-effective-and-beautiful-web-design/#comment-13805</guid> <description><![CDATA[Hi, thank you for your collection. I think
here you may find a lot of nice designs: http://www.designreviewers.com/]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, thank you for your collection. I think<br
/> here you may find a lot of nice designs: <a
href="http://www.designreviewers.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.designreviewers.com/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Payel (HIP)</title><link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/07/30/25-examples-of-clean-effective-and-beautiful-web-design/#comment-13736</link> <dc:creator>Payel (HIP)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:45:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/07/30/25-examples-of-clean-effective-and-beautiful-web-design/#comment-13736</guid> <description><![CDATA[Hi! Adam
I liked your post. I could see some of the best web designs in the web world.
Thanks
Payel]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! Adam</p><p>I liked your post. I could see some of the best web designs in the web world.</p><p>Thanks</p><p>Payel</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>